In the immediate future (2019-2055) temperatures globally will decrease causing colder winters and cooler summers leading to shorter growing seasons. However, in the long term temperatures will increase by 2.6 degrees Celsius by the year 2600 when they will decrease again. The increase is natural and not a result of human activities whose impact was not considered in preparing the paper.
A YouTube presentation of the paper with discussion and questions for those less scientifically oriented can be found at this link:
Grand Solar Minimum Interview with Valentina Zharkova June 27, 2019
.... looking for my Goebbels pic.
Also, please see my earlier post back in January:
Amidst Global Warming Hysteria, NASA Expects Global Cooling
Sunspots have been no existent for a while and there is a 2-3 year lag, the Cooling will begin next year.
I say as soon as it starts Everybody File Lawsuits against every member of the Global Warming Religion and Asset Strip them into Homelessness.
“double dynamo waves”
I think that was the motivation behind the Commodore’s “Brick House”.
Looks like the climate catastrophe crowd accidentally let
some real science get out.
This is, in fact, what to expect from actual cycles we actually know something about.
Here is a good collection of climate change stuff, of the
flavor we don’t get to see enough of, because of politicians
deliberately ignoring clear simple facts from real
scientists, then repeatedly summarizing dogma and hogwash
“facts” they are relying on.
Warmists Stunned by Roger Pielke in Senate Testimony on Climate Change
https://youtu.be/oN_oynx1D8w
Mark Steyn vs Michael Mann, Climate Change: The Facts, Keynote 4, ICCC10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bARjABDqok
Mark Steyn rebukes democrats in climate hearing:
‘You’re effectively enforcing a state ideology’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTM13sI2BFQ
A Dearth of Carbon (w/ Dr. Patrick Moore, environmentalist)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjlmFr4FMvI
Patrick Moore – The Sensible Environmentalist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFHX526NPbE
World in midst of Carbon Drought
(W/Prof. William Happer, Princeton University
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-9UlF8hkhs
Corruption Of The US Temperature Record:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kUAtt2pXlc
The Experts Explain the Global Warming Myth: John Coleman:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AA3OA_2S4QY
25 NASA Scientists Question the Sanity of the Global Warmists:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhW-B2udhQw
Dr. William Happer, PH.D., Keynote 3, ICCC10:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXB5rR9JfKk
Mark Steyn’s Stand Against Climate Alarmism:
In-Depth with the Climate Crybully Conniption-Inducer
The Science Isn’t Settled: A response to the
Climate Change Crybullies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4AADScyWwg&list=PLiXsuqQE1Fcy9dy6oVQURTwTERqRcSdJO
Climatologist David Legates - More CO2 is Good
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lOsmfAO2Gs
The above two documents found at co2science.org give
absolute lie to the claims that “climate change” is a
potential disaster that must be addressed by government
action.
Anyone that actually pays attention to real scientists
realizes that if one thinks CO2 is an issue, the first thing
to figure out is...
What is the OPTIMUM CO2 level for us and our planet?
Real science suggests that optimum plant and animal growth
would put that somewhere around TWICE what we have today.
In fact, mining deep ocean hydrates and carbonates for
carbon will likely become necessary at some point in the
distant future, before “we” have too little CO2 for life
should “we” never learn how to live independent of this planet.
https://youtu.be/M_yqIj38UmY
Professor Valentina Zharkova: The Solar Magnet Field and the Terrestrial Climate
https://youtu.be/2WaU_NJfKOE Meteorologist David Dilley breaks down why ‘Climate Change’ means “Global Cooling”
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11207-019-1447-1
A Model of a Tidally Synchronized Solar Dynamo
~Easy
MAGA
Not that I can actually comment on her science. That math is way out of my league.
But the reason I'm applauding her, is that she has been forced out symposia and run into roadblocks to publishing, simply because she persuasively argues a paradigm for global temperature fluctuation which is in no way connected to runaway fertility in Manhattan or Madagascar, Northern Hemisphere air conditioning in August, or ruminant flatulence.
But she keeps churning out the meticulous solar data. You go, girl.
Don’t give me any of that pseudo science. Humans have angered the Earth goddess with their craven carbon excesses, and the polar bears have to suffer for it.
Duh!
Ya gotta feel for the scientists who researched and wrote this. All the work, all the thought, all the meticulous effort to ensure it is perfect and ready for their peers to critique and review, then use this ground breaking research as citation in their works, explaining the cosmos, stellar physics, and solar climatology. And then, crickets. No one will cite them, no one will critique them, praise them, or even acknowledge them, thus reinforcing the threat of banishment or ostracization for daring to challenge the “consensus”.
Duh. You cannot correlate average land temp to solar irradiance dingbats. Atmospheric land temperatures are insiginificant across density when compared to ocean temps. And you have to measure the entire ocean. All depths. You are not even close to that capability.
Way cool !
I was starting to wonder what I was going to read Tomorrow Morning while eating My Sugar Frosted Flakes. I finished the Help the Polar Bear save his Friends from Gorebull Warming’s Effect game on the back of the Cereal Box.
Thank You,
CedarDave
But that doesn't give us the answer we want so shut up.
Ping.
Nice, some light reading before bedtime.
Beware of wax-winged Greeks flying in a double dynamo.
Bookmark.
I’ve heard her say in a youtube video (dated 2018 IIRC, perhaps earlier) that we should know whether her prediction of a solar grand minimum was correct within 3 years. IE. “global warming” is going to meet an cold death so dramatic that alGore’s acolytes won’t be able to save it. And probably in time to help re-elect Trump. It won’t be fun and will probably be hard on a lot of us, but it can take down all the big Green Libs it may be worth it. I might live to see warmth return; I just need to outlast my parent’s current mark by a decade.