Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not-So-Deep Fakes: New AI-Powered App Creates Realistic Nude Photos of Women for $50
sputniknews.com ^ | 15:50 27.06.2019 | staff

Posted on 06/27/2019 10:18:25 AM PDT by Red Badger

In 2019, you don’t have to be just afraid of hackers who may leak your closely guarded private photos. A newly developed artificial neural network only needs to be fed a normal picture to replace your clothes with what's under them.

An anonymous ‘technology enthusiast’ has created an app which is able to undress a fully clothed person within a couple of clicks, triggering concerns over the ethics of such technology and non-consensual photo sharing.

The app in question is called DeepNude – a play on the new term deepfake – an AI-assisted technology that superimposes faces onto other bodies in both photos and videos, potentially allowing users to create revenge porn, for example.

The website where one can download the app was launched in late March, according to the Twitter account of the enigmatic creator. The app is available in two versions, premium and free.

According to a report by Vice, one does not have to be tech-savvy to use this sexually oriented, automated version of Photoshop. Curious users only have to upload the photo they want to “undress”, click on the button and wait some 30 second until the AI processes it.

Horrifying deepfake app called DeepNude realistically removes the clothing of any woman with a single click. It costs $50 and only works on women. (The black bars were added after using the app.) pic.twitter.com/5KS36FPTqZ — Mike Sington (@MikeSington) 27 июня 2019 г.

DeepNude appears to work only with high-resolution photos of women facing the camera directly, swapping their clothes for a nude body, regardless of what they are wearing. Tests with images of men, cartoon characters or people photographed from unnatural angles and/or in low resolution or poor lighting conditions are said to produce varying results, from somewhat comical to outright disgusting.

Furthermore, according to screenshots taken by Vice contributors, the free version produces an image with a huge dartboard-like watermark. If upgraded to premium for $50, DeepNude is able to produce uncensored photos with a clearly visible ‘Fake’ inscription.

The app currently runs on Windows 10 and Linux, while a Mac version is in the works.

The creator, who requested to be identified as Alberto, told Vice that his brainchild uses an algorithm called the Conditional Adversarial Network (cGAN), which was trained to generate naked images after learning from a dataset of more than 10,000 nude photos of women.

"I'm not a voyeur, I'm a technology enthusiast,” he was quoted as saying. “Continuing to improve the algorithm. Recently, also due to previous failures (other startups) and economic problems, I asked myself if I could have an economic return from this algorithm. That's why I created DeepNude."

"This is absolutely terrifying," said Katelyn Bowden, founder and CEO of non-profit Badass, which fights revenge porn and image abuse. "Now anyone could find themselves a victim of revenge porn, without ever having taken a nude photo. This tech should not be available to the public."

Danielle Citron, professor of law at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, called the technology an “invasion of sexual privacy.”

But the creator insisted that DeepNude doesn't make much of a difference and was no more harmful than Photoshop, which effectively just takes more time to achieve the same results.

Shortly after the initial report in Vice, DeepNude’s Twitter said the yet-unstable website was down due to an unexpected increase in traffic. It was unavailable as of the time of writing.

Hi! DeepNude is offline. Why? Because we did not expect these visits and our servers need reinforcement. We are a small team. We need to fix some bugs and catch our breath. We are working to make DeepNude stable and working. We will be back online soon in a few days. — deepnudeapp (@deepnudeapp) 27 июня 2019 г.


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Business/Economy; Hobbies; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: 1984; apps; deepfake; deepnude; fakenews; preppers; russianpropaganda; russianpuppets; russianstooges; russiasucks; technology; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Red Badger
Even if you pay the $50 fee, the software imprints the word ‘fake’ in the photo like a watermark.......

And somebody will create an app to eliminate the "fake" watermark from the output image.

41 posted on 06/27/2019 10:57:40 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nickedknack

42 posted on 06/27/2019 10:58:46 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
DeepNude appears to work only with high-resolution photos of women facing the camera directly,

But will it be able to tell if it's processing an image of a 13 year old girl? I can see various law enforcement people demanding a feed of what it does.

Next stage would be to be able to download the app, to process images directly on your PC, so that nothing transits the Cloud.

43 posted on 06/27/2019 11:00:44 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

I’d hit it.


44 posted on 06/27/2019 11:06:24 AM PDT by Lazamataz (We can be called a racist and we'll just smile. Because we don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

45 posted on 06/27/2019 11:28:17 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

You make some real valid points heh.


46 posted on 06/27/2019 11:31:33 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I laughed harder than I should of lol.


47 posted on 06/27/2019 11:32:18 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

HILLArious!


48 posted on 06/27/2019 11:33:29 AM PDT by real saxophonist (One side has guns and training. Other side's primary concern is 'gender identity'. Who's gonna win?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I always wanted me a pair of those.................still do!.............


49 posted on 06/27/2019 11:42:13 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
You must be comfortable indeed in your own skin. I went to a Rush TV filming once, and the camera panned the audience at the start, and zoomed in on one person - me!

I saw that happen, and positively knew that I was fully shown in the opening before the start of the show. And when I got home, my wife told me she had taped it, and that I was right there in the opening scene of the audience. Which, I repeat, I positively knew was happening at the time.

So I watched the tape - and I wasn’t in it at all! I rewound it again and again, and I couldn’t see myself. I think my wife had to point my own image out to me! And there it was, “big as life” (we didn’t have a big flat-screen TV back then, of course - or that literally would have been true).

We look in mirrors, but we don’t really see ourselves. My wife recently had a reason to take a selfie - and recoiled from it in horror. Because - as I understand from my much earlier (and younger) experience - we just don’t see ourselves as others see us. Mirror, schmirror - we just don’t.

So I venture the guess that your husband would like a poster like that much more than you would (and I sure pity the poor schlub if he didn’t, and actually admitted it!). If I had such of my wife, I would simply complain that it doesn’t do her justice - entirely too flat, and not nearly as soft as the real thing!


50 posted on 06/27/2019 11:54:11 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

51 posted on 06/27/2019 12:08:38 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

I was 4 years old...................


52 posted on 06/27/2019 12:12:00 PM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

That’s almost like the time TV Guide took a photo of Ann Margret and put Oprah’s head on it. Sacrilege-Sacrilege.


53 posted on 06/27/2019 12:16:16 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (Chivalry is not dead. It is a warriors code and only practiced by warriors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack

54 posted on 06/27/2019 12:18:19 PM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

did somone copy one of the pictures for the other?


55 posted on 06/27/2019 12:25:41 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Yes, they used an old photo of Ann Margaret and put Oprah’s head on it...............


56 posted on 06/27/2019 12:26:58 PM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Yes, they used an old photo of Ann Margaret and put Oprah’s head on it.............

WTH? That's a crime against humanity!

57 posted on 06/27/2019 12:30:19 PM PDT by Covenantor (https://www. are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: nickedknack
it couldn’t calculate a solution for a full frontal of Hillary.

-PJ

58 posted on 06/27/2019 12:34:05 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

How many mega pixels can it imagine?


59 posted on 06/27/2019 12:37:41 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

The article said HD, so whatever that is...........


60 posted on 06/27/2019 12:39:33 PM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson