Deepfake porn and the ethics of being able to watch whatever your imagination desires

metro.co.uk ^ | Friday 31 May 2019 8:22 am | Jessica Lindsay

[BipolarBob]

Who would watch that?

People into feats of strength and locomotives.

[Salamander]

Go to your local WalMart and look up at the monitor near the door, showing the cameras scanning you thoroughly.

Why, I have no idea...but lately, I try to do a little tap dance just to watch it freak out, trying to keep up with me.

[Salamander]

If she were pulling a train with her ginormous horse teeth chomped onto a rope, I’d watch that.

[Repealthe17thAmendment]

The TV show from a few years back, Person of Interest had the general premise that a computer could gather all the data that crossed the internet and any wireless cameras and phones then essentially filter it in such a way as to determine if people were in physical danger.

It seemed a little far-fetched, but now that we see data gathering and storage capacities becoming virtually limitless, it's really just a matter of time before the evaluation processes become more sophisticated.

[unlearner]

“So please ignore the upcoming film of Bill and Hillary Clinton with children.”

Nailed it.

So far, the Pizzagate group and other SRA groups infesting the halls of power have managed to quash most of the leaks. I suppose it might help that the evidence against them is contraband—illegal for anyone to possess. This means whistleblowers cannot easily disseminate it to expose the perps.

[null and void]

Eventually, only releases from an authorized channel will be reliable,

Eventually, even releases from an authorized channel will not be reliable.

'Eventually' being 'today'.

[null and void]

On a rope would be a lot better than what I can imagine them chomped down on...

[DungeonMaster]

That lack of paragraphs makes me thing the article was written by AI. What are they up to now?

[dp0622]

You are right.

Sex involves two people :)

[Red Badger]

It was my fault for not previewing and re-formatting......................

[Seruzawa]

I think you dont know what “pulling a train” means. Google it. Lol.

[Bigg Red]

Exactly. They know that the truth is coming out and they want to obscure the evidence. Not just the Clintons, either.

[RedMonqey]

" that one thing completely unbelieveable in the book, 1984, was a TV that would watch you.”

That book is why when I purchased a new computer, I specifically decided NOT to have a screen that had the built in camera.

Still, with my viewing habits, it won't be hard to track my activities....

[RedMonqey]

" How about AOC pulling a train?”

Without the internet, I doubt I would know what "pulling a train' would mean.

Sadly, I do...

[Boogieman]

They actually had a Star Trek TNG episode like that, where Reg from engineering was creating holodeck programs starring holographic versions his crewmates, including a romantic relationship with Lt. Troi.

[kiryandil]

This is why the Democrats can't nominate Kamala Harris.

They don't understand "why" yet, but they will...

[gnarledmaw]

Then realize that those type of labs still exist and that those replacement s that still take a whole floir can do some truly astonishing things.

[NorthMountain]

Go ahead … make obscene gestures at the camera.

[seawolf101]

I always wondered why the Start Trek hologram deck was always busy. When that technology becomes real people will not want to work anymore.

[clearcarbon]

"With the advent of high definition computer graphics, you can create anything that your imagination can conjure up."

Somehow the movie Forbidden Planet (1956) comes to mind.

"But the Krell forgot one thing.
Monsters, John.
Monsters from the Id."