Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jussie Smollett's Cook County criminal documents ordered unsealed
Fox ^ | 2-23-2019 | Ryan Gaydos

Posted on 05/23/2019 9:48:48 AM PDT by tcrlaf

An Illinois judge on Thursday ordered "Empire" actor Jussie Smollett's criminal case file unsealed, setting up the release of a wealth of information surrounding the controversial -- and often confusing -- case.

The decision came months after Cook County prosecutors dropped charges alleging that the “Empire” actor staged a hate crime attack on himself.

Cook County judge Steven G. Watkins vacated the sealing order on Smollett's docs. When the state attorney asked whether they could have more time to redact personal information, Watkins said "act as if the documents were never sealed in the first place."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: fake; hate; sidebarabuse; smollett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: RummyChick
RummyChick :" I really don’t understand this.
Server can leave it with a receptionist."

Or just tack it on the front door of the legal residential address
and the subpoena is considered, legally, to have been served.

21 posted on 05/23/2019 10:25:52 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

“Why would they need to be ‘sealed’ in the first place?”

Records can be sealed for a number of reasons. All it takes is for a judge to agree. In cases I have read about it is usually to protect the accused so his career isn’t damaged. Why would you do this for one person and not another? My guess is because he could afford the attorney to ask for it and he was famous enough to get it. You can bet that if you or I wanted sealed records for a similar offense, it wouldn’t happen.


22 posted on 05/23/2019 10:26:08 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf; Army Air Corps

23 posted on 05/23/2019 10:27:43 AM PDT by KC_Lion (If you want on First Lady Melania's, Ivanka Trump's or Sarah Palin's Ping Lists, just let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

plaintiff—former judge-— is going to hold a 3 pm press conference


24 posted on 05/23/2019 10:28:33 AM PDT by RummyChick (I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Oh, this should be amusing.


25 posted on 05/23/2019 10:29:16 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

“Smollett voluntarily appeared on national television speaking about the incident in detail,” Judge Watkins said. “After the March dismissal, he stood in front of numerous cameras… in the courthouse lobby speaking about the case.” He added, “these are not the actions of a person seeking simply to maintain his privacy or simply to be let alone.”

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/smolletts-own-actions-prevented-judge-from-keeping-his-police-file-secret/


26 posted on 05/23/2019 10:30:56 AM PDT by RummyChick (I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Poof!...What documents?


27 posted on 05/23/2019 10:33:16 AM PDT by The Louiswu (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

“and often confusing — case”

We weren’t confused about this case. Fraud and corruption all the way.


28 posted on 05/23/2019 10:40:08 AM PDT by dynachrome (Build the wall, deport them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

““and often confusing — case””

Big Media was fretful and had trouble keeping up for a while, until the Hussein Head prosecutor made their lives easier.


29 posted on 05/23/2019 11:37:15 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Because Jussie is one of the aristocracy, and he’s above the law.


Exactly. And the notion someone was pulling his strings to further some bill or other is fantasy of the ‘Q’ breed.


30 posted on 05/23/2019 1:21:04 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson