|
Posted on 05/16/2019 10:28:47 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
Nigel on fire at his BREXIT rally...
Spotted at QResearch..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bcsfIx8bhY
“The majority is with us
== If the Brexit Party wins on Thursday, there will be no 2nd referendum. ==.
” ~ Nigel Farage
and,
Clean Brexit will be October 31st!
17:17
“It is clear to me that the two-party system now serves nothing but itself; and it’s time it was challenged openly and publicly.” Nigel Farage 20-05-2019
A really great speech from Nigel Farage at this rally, certainly one of his best Brexit Party Campaigning speeches to date.
Seen this site noted a couple times on QResearch.
Do we know anything about them?
re skullduggery
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1130581759639396352
HRC is trying to change the subject, lol....
What happened to “Tick Tock” and “I”m going to interrupt right there”?
a demon
https://twitter.com/PunishedBoomer/status/1130288217306148864
Lookie here from that Twitter thread:
Read the top of the page, above the highlighted part.
Get that?
"A New World Order"
F the whole Damned Bush Family.
And within that Tweet, is this source:
https://www.coreysdigs.com/laws/the-abortion-agenda-its-benefactors-what-you-dont-know/
Unspeakable evil. By comparison, Imperial Japan's Unit 731, and Mao's Red Guards, and Stalin, were saints.
Exactly.
She didn’t say whether it was true or not; she said she didn’t know if it was in the book. These lying SOBs are well-versed in how to avoid answering a question.
Here is a question that I find very interesting: Why is it that they are SO CAREFUL to avoid lying under oath, but they seem to have no conscience about committing all sorts of other crimes? It’s ok to commit murder and treason, but it’s not ok to lie about it?
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html
Q drop 964:
...BIDEN/CHINA VERY IMPORTANT MARKER.
Who made it public?
Who really made it public?
Who is making it all public?
WE ARE THE GATEKEEPERS OF ALL [BY ALL WE MEAN ALL] INFORMATION.
U1>CAN>EU>RUSSIA>IRAN>NK>SYRIA>PAK>>>
IRAN NEXT.
$700B - MILITARY [THIS YEAR].
WHY IS THE MILITARY SO IMPORTANT?
RE_READ ALL.
NATIONAL SECURITY.
NATIONAL SECURITY.
These people are STUPID.
Art of the Deal.
TIDAL WAVE INCOMING.
BUCKLE UP.
Q
....................
Biden/China rumblings a marker?
Russian arrests.
Iran next?
Tidal wave coming?
Live stream for Don mcghan at house (he’s not coming)
Wonder if they’ll have another bucket of chicken LOL
Bitt, many thanks for these posts:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3749783/posts?page=1207#1207
https://www.freerepublic08om/focus/chat/3749783/posts?page=1208#1208
C Gato, I’m glad someone broke the code:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3749783/posts?page=1209#1209
And alerted the cops:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3749783/posts?page=1230#1230
The fact that Comey deleted his tweet shows that he is dirty as all get out.
C before D; declas is gonna sink many a derp...
Interview: Trisha B.Anderson. last position with the FBI was Principal Deputy General Counsel within the Office of General Counsel, and was a lawyer at Covington & Burling at the time of the interview.
“Q Were you part of the FISA application review process for the FISA applications regarding Carter Page?
A I was involved at a supervisory level within the legal chain of command.
Q Did you observe any improper considerations, including political bias, affecting that process?
A No.
Q Did you observe any improprieties in that process that would have required subsequent disclosures to the FISA court about content that the FBI had omitted?
Ms. Anderson. I need to confer -Mr. May we confer?
Ms. Kim. Yes.
Mr. Thank you. Ms. Anderson. -- with FBI counsel about classification. [Discussion off the record.] Ms. Anderson. I've been advised by the FBI lawyers that I can't answer that question in an unclassified setting....
Q Thank you.
In the Carter Page FISA warrant process, are you aware of any attempts by the DOJ or the FBI to intentionally mislead the FISA court?
A No.
Q Are you aware of any efforts to omit evidence or manufacture evidence deliberately?
A No.
Q Are you aware of any instances regarding the Carter Page FISA application of the FBI failing to follow all of its proper procedures in obtaining a FISA warrant?
A No.
Q Are you aware of any effort by the FBI to seek a FISA warrant for Carter Page that was not based on credible and sufficient evidence?
A No.
Mr. Counsel, you may be done with this line ofquestioning.
I would just ask the witness, while you're discussing questions that pertain to FISA applications or the FISA process, just to give us a moment to think about the question just in case we do need to ask to confer.
Ms. Anderson. Sure.
Q Okay. What would be your role in any FISA as far as approval or looking at -- any FISA. No specific case, no specific facts.
A So I typically would not be involved in the minutia of the development of a FISA. Rather, I would expect to be informed about or be brought in to be consulted about FISAs that involve controversial legal issues or fact patterns that present difficult calls about probable cause.
So that's one aspect in which I would -- I was involved and how I viewed my responsibilities with respect to the FISA process.
Another area was with respect to all FISAs going through, before they went to the Director, there was an expectation that there would be an SES-level approver of the FISA. Sometimes that could be me, but oftentimes it was one of my two section chiefs. But if I was the only SES person in the office, that would mean I would be responsible for reviewing the FISA package before it went to the Director.
And then, third, within my branch, we had responsibility for the logistical processing of the FISAs for the entire Bureau. And so I had a support unit who handled the logistics of the process: getting the signatures by executives, walking them over to DOJ, handling the orders once they came back from the FISA court, uploading them into the system, that sort of work.
Q So a FISA package, is it presented to you and also simultaneously presented to others that are also approving or looking at aspects of it, or does it follow a linear path?
A It follows a linear path. There is a system called FISAMS within the Bureau that tracks in a linear fashion all the approvals on a FISA. I'm not part of that approval chain, but I or another SESer in my branch is the final approver on hard copy before a FISA goes to the Director or Deputy Director for signature.
Q And that is the next stop after it would leaveNational Security Law Branch; it would go to the Director or Deputy --
A Correct.
Q -- Director? The Director.
A The Director unless he was unavailable, in which case it would go to the Deputy Director.
Q So this FISA management system you reference, someone that gets it would not do whatever they do unless the person below them has done what they do. It follows this linear path.
A Correct.
Q Okay.
You mentioned earlier -- someone had a question about the FISA court, and I think you said something to the effect that it wouldn't be unusual for supplemental information to be provided to the court when a FISA warrant had been presented to the court if there was something learned by the FBI that needed clarification or a supplement. I thought you said there would be a mechanism --
A Correct.
Q -- to provide additional information.
A Correct.
Q Do you know if any additional information, either supplemental or for clarification, was provided to the court for any of the FISAs in the Russia case?
A This question raises the same classification issue that was raised by the question a few moments ago by the minority staff. And so, based on my consultation with the FBI lawyers, I'm not able to answer that question in this unclassified setting.
Q Okay. Going back to not to a particular case or particular facts, it would be part of the general practice or possibility in dealing with a FISA that you would go back to the FISA court with new information in the interest of being candid with the court?
A Yes, if it met a certain threshold. That's correct.
Q Okay.
What is a Woods file?
A A Woods file is a file of documents that's maintained to support the accuracy of every individual fact that's contained in a FISA application.
Q So this is a file. Any fact that is presented in the application, this file documents the source of that individual fact?
A That's correct.
Q And it would probably be more robust than the actual application. My understanding would be the application is asserting the fact but it might not have every detail about the fact or where the fact came from, where theWoods file would have all of that as a repository.
A That could be the case, yes.
Q And a Woods file is mandatory?
A Correct.
Q And a Woods file gets its name from -- why is it called a Woods file?
A in NSD. I'm sorry. Non-SES. There's --
Mr. Herrington. A former colleague.
Ms. Anderson. A former colleague at the Department of Justice drafted the form, and so the form derives from the individual's name.
BY MR. BAKER:
Q And did the form and the practice of a file result from an issue with FISAs?
A Yes, that's my understanding. It precedes my time at the FBI, but I understood there was a pattern of some incidents of omissions that were of concern to the FISA court that resulted in former Director Mueller actually appearing before the FISA court. And the practices were the result of reforms that were made jointly between the FBI and DOJ in order to ensure that we were meeting the standard of accuracy with greater precision.
Q So it goes towards making more sure that the presentations to the court are accurate?
A Absolutely. It's designed to discipline agents when they are drafting and reviewing affidavits to ensure that each of the facts contained in that affidavit are, in fact, accurate, because they must maintain that file of documents supporting that accuracy.”
QUESTION?
My sister generously bought me a DELL Inspiron 17 7000 to keep me going while my computer is being fixed.
This one makes a microphone-type click whenever I navigate to a new web address. I muted the mic, but it still does it.
Did I get a lemon?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
