Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Law Allows Parents To Abort Non-Viable Millennials (satire)
Babylon Bee ^ | 02/01/19 | unknown

Posted on 02/02/2019 6:23:05 AM PST by eyeamok

"Any child who's 30 years old and still living with their parents is obviously a non-viable life form, and that's between the parents and their doctor to discuss options," said one representative defending the bill in the assembly. "The millennial can be kept comfortable in the basement while the mother decides if she wants to keep them. But that's between her and her doctor."

(Excerpt) Read more at babylonbee.com ...


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: abortion; babylonbee; satire
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: QBFimi
Sounds like a modest proposal to be seriously considered.

I believe the operative phrase is "common sense proposal."

21 posted on 02/02/2019 7:15:43 AM PST by gogeo (Liberal politics and mental instability; coincidence, correlation, or causation?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cnsmom

” punished with a child.”

If only that Kansas gal had done it back when!!


22 posted on 02/02/2019 7:16:16 AM PST by litehaus (A memory toooo long.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

And then it will not be between a woman and her doctor. It will simply be a judge.


23 posted on 02/02/2019 7:28:43 AM PST by super7man (Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

I was thinking a 155th trimester abortion would be appropriate for Eric Swallwell


24 posted on 02/02/2019 7:29:30 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

I usually find the “Babylon Bee” to be trite and often dumb, but this one is hilarious!


25 posted on 02/02/2019 7:32:02 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cnsmom

“Obama didn’t want his daughters to be punished with a child.”

And I don’t want the country punished with his progeny.


26 posted on 02/02/2019 7:33:05 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

This is so disgusting. Turns my stomach.

Doesn’t Indiana and Texas have laws that say aborted babies must be buried or cremated.


27 posted on 02/02/2019 7:33:52 AM PST by Daffynition (Rudy: What are you up to today? :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Non-Viable to age 21,
.
Yes, Works for Me!
/s


28 posted on 02/02/2019 7:37:48 AM PST by Big Red Badger (Despised by the Despicable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Lib Feminazi: “Eek, get it out of here! I can’t take it anymore! I have the right to kill my child! OK, he’s 33,but...he’s eating me out of house and home, he never cleans his room or changes the sheets, he has kiddie porn on his computer! How about a late term abortion? Just keep him comfortable while you suck out his brain!”


29 posted on 02/02/2019 7:44:32 AM PST by miserare ( Indict Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
The logical progression here is to move the upper age limit for abortion up to perhaps school age or even to the age of majority- 18 or 21.

If you keep pushing, maybe you can have overlap with when the euthanasia approach can be applied. Funny thing, somew of us get our first grey hairs before being completely rid of acne.
30 posted on 02/02/2019 9:37:12 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Personally, I think 40 would work.


31 posted on 02/02/2019 9:53:09 AM PST by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

My eldest daughter was completely grey-headed before she was thirty. Her husband never knew what color her hair actually was.


32 posted on 02/02/2019 4:15:16 PM PST by arthurus (jjj,,,,''''````)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

hat tip Rush.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6664843/Man-wants-sue-parents-giving-birth-without-consent.html

Man wants to sue his parents for giving birth to him ‘without his consent’ as part of ‘anti-natalist’ movement that says having children is morally wrong


33 posted on 02/04/2019 9:26:40 AM PST by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson