Q Anon: 01/25/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 01/25/19 | FReepers, vanity

[Califreak]

Get out of my...

oh nevermind

;)

[bagster]

This is one of the assertions that was made on the non-Q threads by Q supporters that infuriated the non-Q supporters.

So?

Omelletes….eggs...

Can't support Trump if you work against his op. Simple logic. Basic math. Settled science.

#AskTheDonald

Bagster

[bagster]

I'm looking forward to next January. A lot.

Look forward to it somewhere else.

There's a good lad.

Bagster

[lyby]

“All this talk about Chinese company stealing technology makes me think of Feinstein.”

*********************

Seems I recall that about a year-and-a-half ago there was “talk” of Feinstein’s son or husband serving on some kind of Chinese company board.

[BiggBob]

I wonder where the Huawei investigation will lead.

******************

We have everything.
How can we use what we know?
How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?
What are you witnessing unfold?
Trust the plan.
Q

[Tuscaloosa Goldfinch]

I hear you on that! If so, it is a big wow. Well, I guess time will tell. I do miss Q drops though.

Me too. Maybe soon.

[Bigg Red]

I pray every day that the Holy Spirit will clean up the leadership of the Church.

[Bigg Red]

Indeed.

[Califreak]

Cell phone records?

Ooh la la.....

[Bigg Red]

Yes, sad, isn’t it?

May I ask if your friend attends church every week.

[Bigg Red]

Trust the plan, for sure.

[KitJ]

"Feinstein getting rich off clandestine deals"

Don't forget all the tech companies who got 'favored trade' deals - Alphabet, Google, Amazon, Apple...etc.

We've been bleeding to the ChiComs since Xlinton.

Oh, I almost forgot "Mr. Pelosi".

[TEXOKIE]

They only have to manage the RBG situation until Jan 2020 and then declare no SC picks in an election year.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Interesting thought, ez. That could be a possible scenario.

You seem to be assuming that it would be the dems fending off the POTUS pick. If I understand things correctly, the House doesn’t have anything to do with the POTUS appointments/nominations. That happens in the Senate and why the Senate was the most important midterm election target.

I believe McConnell would allow a nomination in 2020 if he can find a Senate Rule to justify it. He found one to justify putting it off, and I forget what that was - I have a dim memory of something that Obama had set in motion that allowed him to take that stance.

However I also know I can be wrong! LOL! Maybe one of you who knows more about how the Senate works can set me straight if I don’t have this right.

[KitJ]

"Can't support Trump if you work against his op. Simple logic. Basic math. Settled science."

[bagster]

Missed you, lyby.

Bagster

[bagster]

I have a good feeling that this heathen Chinee takedown is gonna lead to other juicy drama.

Bagster

[Califreak]

#metoo

[BlueMondaySkipper]

“I believe McConnell would allow a nomination in 2020 if he can find a Senate Rule to justify it. He found one to justify putting it off, and I forget what that was - I have a dim memory of something that Obama had set in motion that allowed him to take that stance.”

There is no rule. The case that was made is that you shouldn’t confirm a justice in the last year of a lame duck presidency. Trump won’t be in that situation for another 5 years, if at all. In any event, since there is no rule, McConnell can (and likely will given the chance) push the confirmation process through if it presents itself.

[smileyface]

nite

[Bigg Red]

Good job connecting the dots with Feinstein and the Huawei stolen technology.