“That’s why creating it at interest is old time religion. “

Ok I’m game. Tell me how you go about paying interest on your money. Who do you make this interest payment to?

Lincoln’s Greenback issue was highly inflationary, as mass issues of fiat currency usually are; the exception being when it’s done to counter a credit deflation and is merely restoring the previous level of the money supply.

The Greenback issue devalued the dollar and resulted in the suspension of the gold standard for nearly two decades. Restoring the gold standard contracted the money supply and was a major factor of the Long Depression of the late 1800s.

The Greenback issue remained part of the American currency issue right up through the 1963 Series. The $5 U.S. Notes are the Greenback issue carried forward.

1,741 posted on 12/13/2018 12:57:39 PM PST by Pelham (Secure Voter ID. Mexico has it, because unlike us they take voting seriously)

Besides, long shots photography would not prove a “double” any more than a long shot would prove an authentic “single”. Oh, goodie. I WIN? 🤗 Please,👏 Rita.

Nobody EVER wins arguing with me. The best you can do is a wary truce.

But of course you don't win. The issue is not what caused the putrid sack of cabbage, farts, and urnine to collapse, but that a fake Hillary came out. Re-watch that video. If I wasn't Oracling so hard, I'd post it.

My eyes don't lie. I wouldn't even have to know she fell out to know that wasn't the beast.

But it sure makes me understand WHY they trotted out the fake cow.

p.s. She lost 100 pounds in an hour?

#NyetNukka

#VictoryDance

p.p.s. Like I said, though, they only bring out fake cank for emergencies. Like when you simply MUST display the horrid thing in public and she's feeling down on her fat luck. Or when the Presidency is on the line and a collapsing bag of corrupt shiznit just won't be politically correct on America's teewees.

#YourMove

😃

#BreaksOver

1,742 posted on 12/13/2018 1:00:29 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Great reply back to Uncle Sham. It even helped me. My hat’s off to ya! Wish we had more of that type of back and forth on FR. It’d be a much nicer experience for everyone.

1,743 posted on 12/13/2018 1:01:23 PM PST by amorphous

was said to be severe dehydration

Wait.

You believe anything that comes out of the derp Hillary camp?

Oh, Rita.

This might take longer than I thought.

😉

1,744 posted on 12/13/2018 1:03:23 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)

Can we put the top down?

Always.

#RagtopMan

#ForReals

😃

1,745 posted on 12/13/2018 1:05:32 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)

To: Kingwood Kid III

Does that mean that the U.S. government can invalidate the votes for any and all federal office holders from the state of California?

No. The laws of California were followed, and according to the US Supreme Court’s decision in Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. v. US House of Representatives, the House has no choice but to seat. It’s a maxim of law that fraud vitiates everything it touches, but once an election is certified and not contested under that state’s election contest laws, the results of the election hold. The only recourse is to embarrass an elected official into resigning or indict the official if he is an active party to the fraud, perhaps forcing him to resign. Resignation would set off a special election to be called by that state’s legislature.

Does this mean that until and unless the State of California cleans up it’s elections process, laws, voter roles, etc. the State of California has forfeited its rights to representation of all federal office holders in the State of California?

No. Federal elections are partially controlled by Congress; for example, setting the date of a federal election. The state is responsible for the actual election. Failure of a state to handle its job properly does not translate into losing rights of statehood.

Thinking long term, does that mean that California from now until the voter fraud is remedied and corrected, loses its U.S. Senators, U.S. Congressmen, etc. representation in the U.S. Government?

No.

If we look at the reconstruction period following the Civil War, it took some of the former confederate states years to re-enter the Union. The state of California might be in a similar predicament.

Not unless there is an insurrection, followed by civil war, followed by a presidential assassination, followed by Congress going crazy and ignoring the Constitution altogether.

Following the end of the war and Lincoln’s assassination, ten southern states were rolled into five military districts and placed under martial law. There is nothing in the Constitution about military districts, only about states and territories. This was blatantly unconstitutional, and insisting that these military districts ratify the 14th Amendment before their constituent states could be readmitted as states was unconstitutional on its face. Lincoln had fought the war under the principle that the Union was permanent, states could not secede at pleasure – and that Congress couldn’t throw a state out of the Union at its pleasure.

The Supreme Court could have addressed this anomaly and its attendant can of constitutional worms tangentially in 1939 in Coleman v. Miller, but with Appomattox only 74 years in the past and war on the horizon, the Court didn’t want to rip the scab off the Civil War. The Court held that in the heat of the moment, actions were taken that were not properly constitutional, but this wasn’t the time to address them.

For a federal takeover of California as you are suggesting, the state or its citizenry would have to take actions that would cause the President to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 and Congress to suspend habeus corpus in accordance with Article I/Section 9 of the Constitution, in effect declaring martial law. That’s what happened after Fort Sumter.

1,746 posted on 12/13/2018 1:07:15 PM PST by Publius

[Here's a picture of me with my Digging Buddy, Yukon Cornelius!.... and some of our Qanteen Dawgs!]

Ha.

Is that little elfie lookin' guy in the sled Paladin2?

Roll him on up outta heah, heah?

MUSH!!!

#DropHimOffWithTheBumble

😫

1,747 posted on 12/13/2018 1:10:49 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)

The Clinto Foundation operated as a closely held family organization, not a philanthropic agency.

BAH......ooom!

1,748 posted on 12/13/2018 1:21:05 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

S. M. o. C. K. I believe the word definitions speak for themselves. Looks like there is a procedure in place to secure crucial communications as the situation changes. Or not. What do you think?

Scalable - able to be scaled or climbed, able to be changed in size or scale

Method - systematic planning or action, a particular form of procedure for accomplishing something or approaching something

Cryptographic- the practice and study of techniques for secure communications in the presence of third parties called adversaries.

Key - of paramount or crucial importance

1,749 posted on 12/13/2018 1:27:37 PM PST by KittenClaws ("They've got Daryl's Dad's car! .....Red Dawn)

Doyle and Monihan have Hillary Capone by the 1040s. They don’t want a LEAK to ruin their case(s).

No deal for submitting their case dox to the Committee. I agree.

1,750 posted on 12/13/2018 1:27:38 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Meadows brings the choke hold on these two ODD witnesses.

1,751 posted on 12/13/2018 1:27:44 PM PST by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)

Now, witnesses coughing up symptoms of self protection with reluctance to even cooperate with Committee.

1,752 posted on 12/13/2018 1:29:26 PM PST by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)

Meadows can’t guarantee that ANY of this info will not be leaked...to the Clintons.

1,753 posted on 12/13/2018 1:32:10 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

So Audrey has this on twitter regarding Operation Blackeye. Just got back and have not read it yet.

https://twitter.com/punkassaudrey/status/1073238092662722560

1,754 posted on 12/13/2018 1:34:27 PM PST by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)

To: Cats Pajamas

1,755 posted on 12/13/2018 1:35:34 PM PST by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)

Misappropriation of their Foundation funds not matching their IRS 501C3 for frigging “Library”. Late with application modifications with a denial of “real” activity. According to insider witness.

Meadows done, without documents for the Congress, because THERE ISAN OPEN INVESTIGATION IUT IF LITTLE RICK, ARKANSAS!

Huber!

1,756 posted on 12/13/2018 1:36:41 PM PST by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)

I’m thinking of adding a couple more kWs of solar power; maybe an underground bunker. ;)
*********************************************************************
LOL. Me too. All I have right now is portable solar power for recharging small electronics - good for our typical power outages, but not long term.

1,757 posted on 12/13/2018 1:36:47 PM PST by greeneyes

To: Cats Pajamas

1,758 posted on 12/13/2018 1:37:50 PM PST by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)

To: Cats Pajamas

1,759 posted on 12/13/2018 1:39:49 PM PST by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)

Yeh, I know. I should have asked the question if anyone knew anything about it, since I was not familiar with the source.

Someone immediately posted to me that it was not correct, so I was hoping everyone saw that it was debunked.

1,760 posted on 12/13/2018 1:40:49 PM PST by greeneyes

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794