Q Anon: 12/10/18 Trust Trump's Plan

WHO IS TALKING?
THINK BIG.
THINK BIGGER.
THINK BIGGEST.

O’s turning to Q’s

Hmmmmmmm

1,681 posted on 12/13/2018 9:58:06 AM PST by Chuckster (Battlestar Galactica is not fiction)

To: stars & stripes forever

1,682 posted on 12/13/2018 10:05:04 AM PST by Chuckster (Battlestar Galactica is not fiction)

To: mountainfolk

My take on Pence at the meeting with Chuck and Nancy. He knows them all to well. Probably there to observe body language.

1,683 posted on 12/13/2018 10:05:06 AM PST by defconw ("The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose and it will defend itself.")

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

“Charlie” is a holdover slang from the Korean/Vietnam era meaning “Chinese”

"Charlie don't surf"

1,684 posted on 12/13/2018 10:08:19 AM PST by Chuckster (Battlestar Galactica is not fiction)

This is a bit late. Most offenders will be gone soon. Conservatives need to adopt the Pence rule. The nuts will be coming out of the woodwork.

1,685 posted on 12/13/2018 10:09:00 AM PST by defconw ("The truth is like a lion. You don't have to defend it. Let it loose and it will defend itself.")

To: bitt; Cletus.D.Yokel; bagster

“Tom” was a running joke last night on 8Chan. It has no bearing on anything we’re researching.

Kind of like an “I’m Spartacus” type thing. It started when anon accused another anon of being a shill and asked if they were so-and-so. Anon 2 replied with “no, I’m Tom”, and it kind of took off from there.

Slightly kekish, but not relevant.

1,686 posted on 12/13/2018 10:11:03 AM PST by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

"Interesting trivia: “Charlie” is a holdover slang from the Korean/Vietnam era meaning “Chinese”."

"Charlie" in Vietnam was from "Victor Charlie" - VC in radio lingo.

1,687 posted on 12/13/2018 10:16:58 AM PST by Flag_This (Liberals are locusts.)

You have more faith than I do about the veracity and determination of the forces supposedly acting on our behalf. I would much rather you being correct than how I currently feel about all of this.

I certainly understand the feeling!

I want everything to happen faster, once I decide it.

Except life itself. Wish it'd slow down a bit.

Do we really have any other choice about this?

Is there really any other plan that is comprehensive and has this caliber of players on our side?

I'm in with Trump all the way. Until the end. He fights. I'm on his side until the cows come home.

And until I see evidence otherwise, I'm on Q's side.

1,688 posted on 12/13/2018 10:31:33 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion

With every new administration there has been turnover of staff.
+++++++++++++++++

How many have been brought before a grand jury?

https://www.npr.org/2018/09/06/645308583/grand-jury-looking-into-case-of-ex-fbi-deputy-director-andrew-mccabe

1,689 posted on 12/13/2018 10:33:57 AM PST by BiggBob

Thank you.

Your post is the one I was looking for.

I had to go do something else for a while and lost my place.

1,690 posted on 12/13/2018 10:38:29 AM PST by Califreak (Take Me Back To Constantinople)

To: Kingwood Kid III

Would love this scenario.

Then the imposition of Federal regulation for all elections of House Members’ and Senators’ elections (voter ID, prior registration, absentee votes prohibited except for good reason). Maybe even hold Federal elections separate from local and state elections.

1,691 posted on 12/13/2018 10:38:38 AM PST by Yulee

Aim away from Bagster. He’d marry it, for sure.

You bet your bippy.

#BagsterIsWilling

Trivia question:

That hashtag is a riff on "Barkis is willing" from a piece of literature.

Name it.

No googling allowed.

*Jeopardy music*

#BackToOracling

1,692 posted on 12/13/2018 10:40:48 AM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)

1,693 posted on 12/13/2018 10:43:08 AM PST by Chuckster (Battlestar Galactica is not fiction)

I also see Trump as something of a Rodney Dangerfield from Caddyshack. Saw the movie a couple of weeks ago, and noticed a little bit of Trumpishness there.

He also reminds me of James Bond in ‘Goldfinger’ - “Let’s have some fun with Mr. Schumer, shall we?”

1,694 posted on 12/13/2018 10:44:10 AM PST by meyer (WWG1WGA, MAGA!)

Ora cling?

Sounds like some sort of medical condition...

1,695 posted on 12/13/2018 10:44:21 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

https://dailyreckoning.com/central-bank-can-never-run-money/

Why a Central Bank Can Never Run Out of Money

“We can’t run out of money,” economist L. Randall Wray said. The U.S. government spends through keystrokes that credit bank accounts, he continued. The money comes from nowhere. The government doesn’t need to finance itself with taxes. And it doesn’t borrow its own currency. It can afford all that is for sale in dollars.

Despite laying out an incontrovertible set of facts, Wray’s audience often is aghast. He says he gets four reactions when he tells people about how the government spends:

Incredulity: “That’s crazy!”
Fear: “Zimbabwe! Weimar!”
Moral indignation: “You’d destroy our economy!”
Anger: “You’re a dirty pinko commie fascist!”

Wray is one of the architects of Modern Monetary Theory, or MMT. In essence, it is a description of how our monetary system works. The implications are profound. And Wray is very good at explaining it simply. Below are some notes from a talk he gave at the Post Keynesian Conference in Kansas City, which I attended.

To begin, I like how Wray emphasized he’s not really saying anything people at the Federal Reserve Bank don’t already understand. First, there is a great quote from Ben Bernanke when, as Fed chief, he was on 60 Minutes:

Scott Pelley: Is that tax money that the Fed is spending?

Ben Bernanke: It’s not tax money… We simply use the computer to mark up the size of the account.

Bernanke gets it. “The Fed can’t run out of money,” Wray said. “As long as someone at the Fed has a finger and they have a key to stroke, they can’t possibly run out of money.”

Second, there is this statement from the St. Louis Fed:

“As the sole manufacturer of dollars, whose debt is denominated in dollars, the U.S. government can never become insolvent, i.e., unable to pay its bills. In this sense, the government is not dependent on credit markets to remain operational.”

And yet it is not uncommon to hear people say the U.S. is bankrupt or that the Fed itself is somehow in trouble. People on the inside know differently. As Wray emphasized:

Government can never run out of dollars. It can never be forced to default. It can never be forced to miss a payment. It is never subject to whims of “bond vigilantes.”

Money… is simply the way we keep score in a modern economy. Banks are the scorekeepers.

Thus, there is no need to balance the budget, heresy of heresies! As Wray says, “The necessity of balancing the budget is a myth, a superstition, the equivalent of old-time religion.”

“Whoa!” I hear you say. Let’s back up.

To understand how modern money works, it may be best to start with the banking system. Wray began with a simple model of a bank, a firm and a household. “So a firm approaches a bank and says it would like a loan,” Wray says. “Where does the bank get the money?”

It creates it out of thin air, out of nothing. It keystrokes it into existence. It creates a loan (an asset for the bank) and offsets it with a deposit (a liability for the bank). The firm gets a credit (an asset) and an offsetting debit (the loan). No prior deposits needed. As Wray says: “Loans create deposits. The bank lends its own IOUs. Can they run out?

“Of course not. They can’t run out of their own IOUs.”

This is important. If you don’t get this, banking will forever remain a mystery to you....