Posted on 12/10/2018 10:18:07 PM PST by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Storm Is Upon Us Q - We Are The Plan - 6 min
YouTube Dan Duval Discovering the Truth With Dan Duval-Part 3 - Excellent orientation to Q by Praying Medic
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction Also, Stormisuponus on Bitchute
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Medium Martin Geddes WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
“Pay Attention”
Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread Qanon.app Q drops - copied from Qs 8chan board
Thread Qanonposts.com Q drops - copied from Qs 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website Qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Website Whitehouse Whitehouse.gov - President Trump's Executive Orders, Proclamations, Nominations, WH press briefings and news
Website FBI vault.fbi.gov - new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media
Website State Dept. foia.state.gov - Virtual Reading Room Documents Search
Table FReeQs Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
“Power to the People”
Website Saul Montes-Bradley Non Q Commentary also hosting Rex , Brian Cates and Thomas Wictor
Vimeo Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops. Also, his own website, ITunes and Podbean.com
Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drop. Also, his own website YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent. Also, @NemoV on GAB.AI
Neonrevolt Includes highly detailed, investigative Q-drop reactionsAlso,@NeonRevolt on GAB.AI
GAB.AI Thomas_Wictor Includes excellent analysis of the Swamp
Lisa Mei Crowley Includes Q-drop reactions. Also, @lisamei62 on GAB.AI
Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
Well big fat piles of crap. Huber not testifying.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3712477/posts
Is that because the stress test failed??
__________________________________________________
I don’t know if it’s the Deep State countering that has changed the schedule, but I took the excerpt below to mean there is another “Huber” out there.
Excerpt #2603
>>4278743
What if there’s another prosecutor (outside of DC) assigned by SESSIONS w/ the same mandate/authority?
ONE FOR THE HISTORY BOOKS?
NOT LONG NOW.
Q
Below, I thought the reference meant the other prosecutor was assigned in response to Sessions being forced to go public with Huber’s role. (i.e., another “variable” was created).
Excerpt 2604
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 432368 No.4279257
Dec 12 2018 17:52:23 (EST)
>>4278980
FALSE.
HUBER will bring SEVERE PAIN TO DC.
SESSIONS’ forced release of name [HUBER] to House created another variable.
No, it wasn't. Patience and faith, it's all we have.
Poor old Bagster is going to busier than a one armed fiddle player with the crabs
#I'llBuyTheBeersBagser
LESS than 10--only 3 of whom were civilians. Period. That's all I can recall Q saying about the composition. There have been some hints construed to mean that the non-civilians were military intel. That's quite logical given their wording, style etc.
Thanks, Mr. Bag man, for the Oracle.
As usual, I’m hopelessly behind. I’ve been overseeing a deck replacement at my wonderful abode, and it’s kept me away from FR and Q a little bit.
Q seems to be carpet-posting today. My opinion, FWIW - TS is about THTF. :)
Re 3 detention centers:
I think I recall one was being built in Washington state.
And Tungsten.
HOWEVER, the underlying basis of this DOLLAR POWER is US control of Mideast oil.
The strength of any fiat currency comes down to confidence in the government that issues that currency.
The greater the confidence in that government, the stronger the currency and debt, and lower the interest rate on that debt.
Conversely, lack of confidence leads to a weak currency, and higher interest rate on its debt.
Once confidence is gone, hyperinflation can emerge.
I certainly agree that that the confidence can be supported by a wide range of factors.
Best
The Melania answer about beauty and love of country tells me that Melania isnt Q. No way shed say that bout herself.
For those who arent on Twitter but want to see all POTUS tweets, there is a tab you can activate on Qmap.pub that intersperses his tweets with Q posts. Its interesting to read them together.
USMC, re watching trolls squirm: Their flop sweat is nectar.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
“SMOCK” - An Unlikely Bunny Dive
I saw that Qmap.pub option for tweets, Melian, but couldn’t figure out how to get it to work! Then, seeing your above comment, I went back and somehow was able to figure out how to activate it! THANKS !
Here are the 2 tweets which turn up in the POTUS TWEET search engine on Qmap.pub with the term “SMOCK” in them:
SMOCK TWEETS
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump 10 Dec 2018 5:46:11 AM
Democrats cant find a Smocking Gun tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comeys testimony. No Smocking Gun...No Collusion. @FoxNews Thats because there was NO COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it a campaign contribution,...
101K
5:46 AM - Dec 10, 2018
AND:
Donald J. Trump
1 Aug 2018 - 10:23:13 AM
We already have a smocking gun about a campaign getting dirt on their opponent, it was Hillary Clinton. How is it OK for Hillary Clinton to proactively seek dirt from the Russians but the Trump campaign met at the Russians request and that is bad? Marc Thiessen, Washington Post
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 1, 2018
# # # # # # #
Analysis
In the August tweet, POTUS is addressing the “SMOCKING” gun of Hillary’s efforts to obtain dirt on her opponent.
This is apparently a retweet of a tweet by Marc Thiessen. Is he the source of the original “SMOCK?”..... or was that an innovation by the POTUS?
POTUS is being accused of seeking help from the Russians when it is plain that it was Hillary’s camp which had far many more Russian ties.
In the December tweet, once more it is a revisiting of efforts to tie Trump to the Russians and obtaining a “SMOCK”ing gun to them. But this time he says it is the DEMS as a whole who have been trying to do so, not specifically Hillary, as in the first tweet. The just recent testimony by Comey destroyed that as a possibility.
So to me, “SMOCK”ing GUN now stands in general for “Ties to Russia by Trump are bogus.” He is “Mocking” their so-called “Smoking” gun - hence: “SMOCKING”
BUT IS THERE MORE?
Salon makes the astute point that “SMOCKING GUN” is the “New COVFEFE.”
That does seem to be true.... and yet we learned some time back that “COVFEFE” is an acronym for a Congressional Act.
This link establishes that:
https://www.allacronyms.com/Covfefe/Communications_Over_Various_Feeds_Electronically_for_Engagement
And Wiki fleshes it out:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Over_Various_Feeds_Electronically_for_Engagement_Act
“The Communications Over Various Feeds Electronically for Engagement Act (COVFEFE Act) is a bill introduced into the United States House of Representatives in 2017, during the 115th United States Congress.”
“The bill would amend the Presidential Records Act to preserve Twitter posts and other social media interactions of the president of the United States, and to require the National Archives to store such items...”
So with the late night/ early morning use of a strange word, “COVFEFE,” our magnificent POTUS was trolling everyone about legislation dealing with his very tweeting! LOL! At that time there was a YUUUUGE effort on both sides of the aisle to pressure him into “stopping with the tweeting, already!”
Using the reasoning that our POTUS is also directing us to other directions by using a “misspelling” of “SMOCK” to search out an acronym, I went ahead and dug deeper, even though I had tried digging this before, with no satisfactory results.
The shovel turned up this possibility for “S.M.O.C.K.,” which I would like to nominate as a possible candidate for an alternative meaning for “SMOCK” in our Q LexiQon:
SMOCK
Scalable Method of Cryptographic Key
When one searches on that phrase, “Scalable Method of Cryptographic Key”
we turn up some links:
SMOCK: A Scalable Method of Cryptographic Key Management For Mission-Critical Networks
Wenbo He Ying Huang Klara Nahrstedt wenbohe@uiuc. edu huang23@uiuc. edu klara@cs. uiuc. edu
Department of Computer Science 201 N. Goodwin Avenue Urbana, IL 61801-2302
Abstract
Whay C. Lee Whay.Lee@motorola. com Motorola Labs
111 Locke Drive Marlborough, MA 01752
“In this paper, we study challenges and possible solutions to cryptographic key management in mission-critical networks. Existing symmetric key cryptography mechanisms do not scale well when supporting end-to-end secure and private communication. Existing public key cryptography mechanisms in self-organized ad hoc networks cannot resist a Sybil attack, where a single malicious node presents multiple identities to control a substantial fraction of a network. In this paper, we present a new paradigm of public key cryptography based on combinatorial design, called SMOCK, where nodes combine more than one key to encrypt and decrypt each message. Our key allocation scheme guarantees that a set of keys held by one user is not a subset of keys held by any other user. We show that our proposed method offers efficiency in memory usage, control data exchange, as well as controllable resilience against node captures.”
Lets look at that again:
In this paper, we present a new paradigm of public key cryptography based on combinatorial design, called SMOCK, WHERE NODES COMBINE MORE THAN ONE KEY TO ENCRYPT AND DECRYPT EACH MESSAGE.
AND
A Scalable Method Of Cryptography Key Management For Mission-Critical Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks Project Source Code
April 14, 2012
A Scalable Method of Cryptography Key Management for Mission-Critical Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks project “
Abstract:
A Scalable Method of Cryptographic Key Management for Mission-Critical Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks project is a cse networking project implemented in java platform. THIS PROJECT IS USED IN WIRELESS NETWORKING SYSTEMS WHERE THERE IS NEED TO PROVIDE SECURE COMMUNICATION.
Main idea of this project is to implement a cryptographic key management method which will help in achieving zero communication overhead for authentication and provides high service availability. Here we use two keys one is public key and other is private key which means nodes are encrypted using these two pair of keys for encryption and decryption messages .
Ive already just told you EVERYTHING about my understanding and experience regarding this type of technology [which is NOTHING] . But I will still venture a few questions for some of the more techie-gifted FReeQs among us, and perhaps the by chance lurking Anon:
*Is POTUS using or is suggesting use of a particular kind of encryption structure for his comms?
*Or is he telling us he is using such in some way?
*Or were the Derps using such comms in August .... and again in December?
*Or were the SMOCK comms used by the Derps un-encrypted, and then in the August, and December tweets were to let them know that that was how “we have everything?”
Has this been posted yet?
THIS IS HUGE! Judge Sentencing General Flynn Demands to See FBI 302 Documents on Flynn Ambush Interview
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Fascinating.
One for the history books indeed!
One in OK?
Thanks.
Look at Santa’s left arm. It’s a distorted face of a woman. The bag makes up her hair. Her neck extends all the way to the bottom of the frame. Looks like a black woman. LL?
Also, there is indeed a tree, an elf/witch, hammer, animal, masked person, and other images, all in the bag over his shoulder. I’ll try to upload a larger, enhanced image.
upsdriver wrote:
...2016 elections, 2018 elections, stand. 2019 >> Voter ID, 2020 safe...
This I am sorry to read, I had so been hoping 2018 elections would be challenged. (At least in Nevada)
I just couldn’t imagine she’d say it about herself. Now it could be one of the other 10 that said it instead....hmmmm...
bird might mean twitter....
True, the strength of a currency is ultimately about confidence.
But part of that is assurance of its future value.
In the case of US dollars, that is buttressed by the fact that there are a few things that ONLY US DOLLARS CAN BUY, most notably:
1) U.S. Bonds (The great bond market with its high interest rates as compared with risk)
2) OPEC oil
3) Payment of US Taxes
Yep, even the taxes have a role in structuring the value of our currency ... as long as the economy and our market are worth doing business in!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.