Q Anon: 11/07/18 Trust Trump's Plan

NSA had better be on this, instead of listening to my phone calls talking about my dog...

Why the hell are you calling the NSA about your dog?

Oh, you meant "listening in on". :-P

521 posted on 11/08/2018 7:25:49 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

Good it’s up on FR.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3704262/posts

Trump: Law Enforcement is looking into Election Fraud in Broward and Palm Beach
Twitter ^ | November 8, 2018 | Donald J. Trump

522 posted on 11/08/2018 7:27:05 PM PST by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)

It’s cold in Denver, so they gotta be getting paid to be there.

523 posted on 11/08/2018 7:27:32 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3704253/posts

Rick Scott sues Broward County elections chief, citing concern of ‘rampant fraud’

Gov. Rick Scott’s campaign for Senate filed a lawsuit Thursday night against Broward County’s election head and questioned whether “rampant fraud” could be happening with the counting of votes in South Florida’s Democratic stronghold counties.

Scott, a Republican, holds a 15,079 vote advantage over incumbent Democratic U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson.

In a news conference at the governor’s mansion, Scott questioned how “votes are coming out of nowhere” in Democratic-leaning Broward and Palm Beach counties. He said he has ordered the Florida Department of Law Enforcement to investigate. He blasted Palm Beach elections chief Susan Bucher and Broward elections head Brenda Snipes for what he called “incompetence.”

524 posted on 11/08/2018 7:28:07 PM PST by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)

To: Disestablishmentarian

broward county -

only ballots that should be showing up are military ballots.

525 posted on 11/08/2018 7:28:49 PM PST by bitt ("Let justice be done though the heavens fall".)

526 posted on 11/08/2018 7:29:03 PM PST by xone

Q post 2460 may have been a warning to those planning protests... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_law📁 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act📁 "..or in response to chaos associated with protests and mob action," Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

527 posted on 11/08/2018 7:30:07 PM PST by Melian (Patriots fight!)

To: grey_whiskers

Actually, the rhino doesn’t look very impressed.

528 posted on 11/08/2018 7:30:32 PM PST by mairdie (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKo6Ll07wmk8TeGx9PShukg)

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

529 posted on 11/08/2018 7:30:38 PM PST by bitt ("Let justice be done though the heavens fall".)

Actually, the rhino doesn’t look very impressed.

I didn't say the elephant was concerned with the RINO's enjoyment, either.

It's one of the reasons liberal women are always angry at men, too. Sensitive New-Age Guys (adult topics)

530 posted on 11/08/2018 7:36:15 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

Actually, the rhino doesn’t look very impressed.

I didn't say the elephant was concerned with the RINO's enjoyment, either.

It's one of the reasons liberal women are always angry at men, too. Sensitive New-Age Guys (adult topics)

531 posted on 11/08/2018 7:37:06 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

“And to be honest, it always was, as I’ve said time and again. The people that matter, knew all along the nature of Sessions.”

As usual, dear bagster, you are correct. I’m not a ‘body language EXPERT’ but this does not have the appearance of a man leaving in disgrace. This looks like a Conquering Hero existing after a job well done with kudos and accolades.

https://youtu.be/0ZKdksFziEI

God bless you Jeff Sessions!

532 posted on 11/08/2018 7:43:34 PM PST by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)

To: grey_whiskers

Uh, I never said sessions was deep state.

Reading comprehension, it works!

533 posted on 11/08/2018 7:43:48 PM PST by Okeydoker

Many thanks for that info!!

ransomnote wrote:
I lifted the following in it’s entirety from Whatfinger.com:

Recipe for massive voter fraud caught on video in FL: CAUGHT: A Broward County, Florida citizen sees ballots being transported in private vehicles & transferred to rented truck on #ElectionNight. This violates all chain of custody requirements for paper ballots. Speculation about what happened to the ballots. (Quick clip 2:10) CLICK HERE

I like Wneighbor’s suggestion that we call/message our government to intervene. I do believe this activity is already on the radar for Q and law enforcement (it’s not over yet) but I think it’s wise that congress “get” that we are watching and we won’t tolerate it. They got used to our silence, let them learn to face our noise.

To Call Congress: https://www.callmycongress.com

534 posted on 11/08/2018 7:45:33 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)

Somehow I got left off the ping list so it took me a while to find the new thread. Finally caught up, good to see I didn’t miss anything. *cough*

One thing to note about Ginsburg. Pnemonia is a hell of a thing. I lost my mother in law and my dad to it. Rand Paul got it when he got the broken ribs in the attack on him. Another Twitter user got it too when she broke a rib, she told me when I posted about this there.

With three broken ribs you can guarantee RBG will get pnemonia. At 85 she is not likely to survive it, but you never know.

Either way she’s done. Next sessions starts 11/26. Here’s the cases.

Apple v. Pepper
HIGHLIGHTS
The case: Robert Pepper and other plaintiffs filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple Inc., alleging that Apple was monopolizing the market for iPhone apps. Apple controls which apps can be sold through its App Store and keeps 30 percent of sales from apps developed by third party developers that are sold in the App Store. The district court dismissed the case, ruling that consumers of iPhone apps are purchasing directly from app developers, not Apple, and therefore could not sue for antitrust violations according to precedent from a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court ruling. The Ninth Circuit Court reversed the dismissal, ruling that consumers are purchasing from Apple, not the app developers.
The issue: Whether consumers may sue for antitrust damages anyone who delivers goods to them, even where they seek damages based on prices set by third parties who would be the immediate victims of the alleged offense.

Nieves v. Bartlett
HIGHLIGHTS
The case: Russell Bartlett was arrested by Alaska state troopers Luis Nieves and Bryce Weight. Bartlett sued Nieves and Weight for false arrest, excessive force, malicious prosecution, and retaliatory arrest. The Ninth Circuit Court agreed with the district court that Nieves and Weight had had probable cause to arrest Bartlett for harassment, disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, or assault. The district court granted summary judgement to Nieves and Weight on all counts. The Ninth Circuit Court affirmed the district court’s ruling on the false arrest, excessive force, and malicious prosecution charges, but reversed the ruling on the retaliatory arrest charge.
The issue: In Hartman v. Moore, 54 7 U.S. 250 (2006), this Court held that probable cause defeats a First Amendment retaliatory-prosecution claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as a matter of law. Does probable cause likewise defeat a First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim under § 1983?

Nutraceutical Corp. v. Lambert
HIGHLIGHTS
The case: Troy Lambert filed a class action against Nutraceutical Corp. for making false claims about a dietary supplement that was supposed to increase sexual performance. After a district court declined to let the class action move forward, Lambert filed an appeal, but he did not do so within 14 days, as required by the court.
The issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred when it held that equitable exceptions apply to mandatory claim-processing rules—such as Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), which establishes a 14-day deadline to file a petition for permission to appeal an order granting or denying class-action certification—and can excuse a party’s failure to file timely within the deadline specified by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), in conflict with the decisions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 7th, 10th and 11th Circuits.

Carpenter v. Murphy - no information.

Timbs v. Indiana
HIGHLIGHTS
The case: When Tyson Timbs pleaded guilty to a drug charge, he was ordered as part of his sentence to forfeit his Land Rover, on the grounds that he had transported drugs in the vehicle. A state appeals court ruled in favor of Timbs, who argued that the forfeiture was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment’s clause prohibiting excessive fines. The Indiana Supreme Court reversed the decision, stating that the U.S. Supreme Court had never ruled that the excessive fines clause applied to state governments.
The issue: Whether the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause is incorporated against the States under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission
HIGHLIGHTS
The case: Francis Lorenzo, the director of investment banking at Charles Vista, LLC, sent emails containing false statements to potential investors and was charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with violating three securities-fraud laws. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit agreed with the SEC that Lorenzo had violated two of the laws, but it reversed in regards to the third provision, finding that Lorenzo’s boss had ultimate authority over the statements and therefore Lorenzo did not truly make the statements.
The issue: Whether a misstatement claim that does not meet the elements set forth in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders can be repackaged and pursued as a fraudulent scheme claim.[2]

Dawson v. Steager
HIGHLIGHTS
The case: James Dawson retired from the US Marshal Service in 2008. West Virginia allows some state and local retired law enforcement officers to exempt their retirement benefits from the state income tax. Dawson, receiving benefits from the Federal Employee Retirement System, sought to exempt his retirement income from the state income tax. The tax commissioner denied the exemption. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s decision, ruling that the state’s tax on Dawson’s retirement income was not in conflict with U.S. law.
The issue: Whether this Court’s precedent and the doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity bar states from exempting groups of state retirees from state income tax while discriminating against similarly situated federal retirees based on the source of their retirement income.[2]

Biestek v. Berryhill
HIGHLIGHTS
The case: Michael Biestek stopped working in 2005 due to degenerative disc disease, Hepatitis C, and depression. His application for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits in 2010 was denied by the Social Security Administration (SSA). An administrative law judge found that Biestek was disabled after May 4, 2013, but not before. Biestek appealed, arguing that the judge should have complied with his request to require the vocational expert to provide the data that formed the basis of her opinion regarding other work available to Biestek. The Sixth Circuit Court affirmed the lower court’s decision, ruling that the administrative law judge had not erred in not requiring the vocational expert to produce the data.
The issue: Whether a vocational expert’s testimony can constitute substantial evidence of “other work,” 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(a)(4)(v), available to an applicant for social security benefits on the basis of a disability, when the expert fails upon the applicant’s request to provide the underlying data on which that testimony is premised.[2]

Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
The case: Helsinn Healthcare S.A. was the owner of four patents related to the use of palonosetron to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Prior to the critical date for the on-sale bar, Helsinn signed a supply and purchase contract with MGI Pharma, which was made public but was partly redacted. Helsinn sued Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. for allegedly infringing on the patents. Teva claimed that the patents were invalid under the on-sale bar provision of 35 U.S.C. § 102. Helsinn argued that the patents were valid because the actual invention was kept secret although the sale agreement was public.
The issue: Whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party that is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as prior art for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention.

Gamble v. U.S. - no information

-SB

535 posted on 11/08/2018 7:47:49 PM PST by Snowybear

To: Iscool; No_Doll_i; little jeremiah; hoosiermama; NIKK; Cletus.D.Yokel; smileyface; bagster; bitt; ..

Sounds like Matthew Whitaker in collaboration with Sessions and Trump could be the Stealth Bomber

^^^^^^
THIS

Wouldn't it be just like Q to hint about a 'stealth bomber' and we all thought it was Huber or Sessions, only to find out it was someone none of us were tracking?

After all, the stealth bomber is something you don't pick up on the radar.

And we got so many hints when Q posted the hierarchy of the justice department.

I know we have more than we know, but even this one slipped past my autisticnaciousness...

[if anyone wants on or off my seldom-used ping list, give me a shout]

536 posted on 11/08/2018 7:48:10 PM PST by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)

537 posted on 11/08/2018 7:55:16 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

Trump tweeted that the feds are looking into FL.

-SB

538 posted on 11/08/2018 7:57:41 PM PST by Snowybear

Trump finally has a wartime consigliere.

539 posted on 11/08/2018 7:58:14 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)

To: bitt; defconw

Is he a nancy boy?

Is he a Mary?

540 posted on 11/08/2018 7:58:26 PM PST by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794