Posted on 09/25/2018 12:02:04 PM PDT by LibWhacker
As life has evolved, its complexity has increased exponentially, just like Moores law which states that the number of transistors on an integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years. The regression suggests that if life takes 10 billion years to evolve to the level of complexity associated with homo sapiens, then we may be among the first, if not the first, intelligent civilization in the Milky Way, negating Drakes Equation.
Our Solar Nebula formed from the remnants of an earlier star, suggesting that life from this period might be preserved in the original gas, dust and ice clouds. Life on Earth may be a continuation of a process that began many billions of years before the formation of our Solar System.
In a 2015 study, geneticists, Alexei Sharov at the National Institute on Ageing in Baltimore and Richard Gordon at the Gulf Specimen Marine Laboratory in Florida, extrapolated this trend backwards and found that by the measure of Moores Law, life is older than the Earth itself.
The team takes Moores Law back to zero complexity and the origin of life, by measuring the complexity of life and the rate at which it has increased from prokaryotes to eukaryotes to more complex creatures such as worms, fish, amphibians and eventually mammals. The result is an exponential increase identical to that behind Moores Law with the doubling time, however, expanding to 376 million years rather than two years.
The application of Linear regression of genetic complexity on a log scale extrapolated back to just one base pair suggests the time of the origin of life 9.7 billion years ago. This cosmic time scale for the evolution of life has important consequences: life took ca. 5 billion years to reach the complexity of bacteria; the environments in which life originated and evolved to the prokaryote stage may have been quite different from those envisaged on Earth.
The graph above shows the complexity of organisms, as measured by the length of functional non-redundant DNA per genome counted by nucleotide base pairs (bp), increases linearly with time (Sharov, 2012). Time is counted backwards in billions of years before the present (time 0).
Additionally they suggest that the evolution of advanced organisms has accelerated via development of additional information-processing systems: epigenetic memory, primitive mind, multicellular brain, language, books, computers, and Internet. As a result the doubling time of complexity has reached about every 20 years.
Without Gods creating Word, it would have taken more than a hundred trillion years to have evolved the Universe and everything on the Earth.
This should be under “religion”.
This supposition is invalid. “moore’s law” is a supposition. Regressing from an invalid supposition gives you uncertainty.
“Without Gods creating Word, it would have taken more than a hundred trillion years to have evolved the Universe and everything on the Earth.”
Microsoft created Word.
I liked WordPerfect better.
Garbage out, garbage far-out.
Drakes equation is essentially correct, and only useful for musing as several multiplied variables are completely unknown (beyond not being 1 or 0).
Nature is rarely linear. Most functions and populations and processes are curvilinear.
Another way to look at it is that the universe is too young to have such a high degree of order and complexity arise out of randomness and accident (Darwinism). This implies a Creator or God, who creates the order and complexity that we see.
As God shakes His head and pities poor, unbelieving man. No, actually He is quite angry with those that would deceive humans into scoffing at and rejecting the Word of God because it doesn’t measure up to man’s judgment.
In a 2015 study, geneticists, Alexei Sharov at the National Institute on Ageing in Baltimore and Richard Gordon at the Gulf Specimen Marine Laboratory in Florida, extrapolated this trend backwards and found that by the measure of Moores Law, life is older than the Earth itself.
...
Actually the study was done in 2013, and it doesn’t seem to have generated much interest since then. I’d say it’s more like the study is wrong.
Right, it’s a “log-linear” plot, where taking the logarithm of both sides of an equation straightens it out. What strikes me right away is that the earth comes along and it doesn’t do anything to the graph, lol, almost like it doesn’t make a whit of difference in how the process progresses, when obviously, it must. You’re not going to get whales, people, trees, etc., evolving in deep space. So they could have at least changed the slope at that point.
There are so many “truths” which has to mean that most are not the real truth. I will depend on God’s Word for the real truth. It has never changed.
All of this is based on
the hypothetical Construct
of a fixed speed of light.But the empirical data as evidence
shows a decaying Speed of Light.QED has proven to be a Cul-de-Sac
Today the theory which is most productive
is Stochastic Electro Dynamics (SED)Postulating that the universe is filled with Plasma,
in multiple phases of state of plasma.
Amen!
I’m even going to believe in the seven literal days of creation because that is what the Word of God says and I believe the Book!
but Bird is the Word......
Without Gods creating Word, it would have taken more than a hundred trillion years to have evolved the Universe and everything on the Earth.
Microsoft created Word.
But Corel made WordPerfect
Nothing comes from nothing, and nothing ever can.
- Sound of Music
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.