Q Anon: 08/21/18 "Trust The Plan"

qmap.pub ^ | 08/21/18 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

	“Trust The Plan”
YouTube	President Trump	This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube	Joe Masepoes	Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
Threadreader	Jason Wright	Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Threadreader	ImperatorRex	A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Twitter	Paul Serran	What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Article	Sundance	Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Thread	Martin Geddes	WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
	“Pay Attention”
Thread	Qmap.pub	Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number
Website	We-go-all.net	Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website	qntmpkts.keybase.pub	Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
	“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread	Anonymous	QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles	Bagster	Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread
Lexicon	Swordmaker	LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
	“Power to the People”
YouTube	Praying Medic	Series of videos explaining Q-drops
Twitter	Praying Medic	Immediate reactions to Q-drops
YouTube	Dustin Nemos	Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links
Twitter	ImperatorRex	Includes Q-drop reactions
Thread	SkyPilot	Story of Q - collection of Q information
	“Silent Majority No More”
Website	White House	Email the White House with your support and suggestions
Website	Congress	Email Congress with your support and suggestions
Website	roserambles.org	Q Cards
Thread	Little Jeremiah	Memes
	“Fight, Fight, Fight!”
YouTube	President Reagan	A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images
YouTube	President Kennedy	The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies

[Yulee]

Only 80 posts when there used to be 500?
**************
Obviously the individual posting has not looked at the continuing thread that is refreshed every two days or so.

It would be interesting to have the total number of posts, since the current thread started tallied. It is probably in the hundreds of thousands.

[philman_36]

And by the way, civilians tried in military courts is unlawful and unconstitutional.

Sec. 904 - Art. 104. Aiding the enemy
10 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 10 - ARMED FORCES
Subtitle A - General Military Law
PART II - PERSONNEL
CHAPTER 47 - UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
SUBCHAPTER X - PUNITIVE ARTICLES
Sec. 904 - Art. 104. Aiding the enemy
From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov

§904. Art. 104. Aiding the enemy

Any person who—

(1) aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other things; or

(2) without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to, or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly;

shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct. This section does not apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A of this title.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 70; Pub. L. 109–366, §4(a)(2), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2631.)

"Any person" pretty much covers everybody, civilian and military, doesn't it?

[Yulee]

*He sprinkles troll repellant around all the doors and windows and lays out a couple of Troll Motels just in case.*
************
Need to double up on the repellent. Post 84 snuck through.

[Okeydoker]

No.se

The statute you cited is the UCMJ which applies to military personnel and a very narrow slice of civilians working ina war zone .

The title of the statute indicates not only that it is in the UCMJ but that it specifically applies to military personnel. Moreover, civilians do not fall under military justice and are covered in other sections of federal code, triable in US federal Courts. The only exception are unlawful combatants fighting the US. They are deemed to be subject to military law when caught.

[Typelouder]

From Wictor's Twitter:

Lanny Davis relied on someone who SCREWED HIM. Davis announced (link: http://michaelcohentruth.com) michaelcohentruth.com, which goes to TRUMP'S WEBSITE. Not a SNAFU. Davis was TRICKED.

Cohen and Manafort are still in Trump's camp. Lanny was played!

[TEXOKIE]

In early w/Coffee!!

Time to make the Donuts.... Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AA1XDqK8tY

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

LOL! Thanks for making the donuts today, LiveFreeOrDie2001!

*texokie peers hopefully into the covered donut tray, and two donuts beckon. texokie takes one*

YUM!!! THANKS!!!

[TEXOKIE]

Oh SkyPilot - that is a powerful post. Thanks.

[xone]

. The only exception are unlawful combatants fighting the US. They are deemed to be subject to military law when caught.

Exactly what we have here, unlawful combatants.

[Bigg Red]

mark

[LonePalm]

Try this combo on me, Cafe du Monde coffee and Beignets. I'll make more.

WWG1WGA

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

[TEXOKIE]

That is an amazing Dot Collection on Dennis Shields. I had not realized he had died, much less under such circumstances.

Thanks.

[softengine]

Been watching this show for a while but haven’t had much to say. But I’ll bite ... Are these spreadsheets listing running numbers of “sealed indictments” supposed to mean something?

[WildHighlander57]

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/98yduw/connnecting_some_dots/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3680160/posts?page=1306#1306

(H/t cboldt)

[txhurl]

[Okeydoker]

Exactly what we have here, unlawful combatants.
—————
Really?

“An unlawful combatant, illegal combatant or unprivileged combatant/belligerent is a person who directly engages in armed conflict in violation of the laws of war. “

[ichabod1]

Nah, they’re not supposed to mean anything.

[TEXOKIE]

Thanks for the info on the Cohen deal from April, KittenClaws! Great Job!

[KittenClaws]

Hi TEXOKIE!

I didn’t have time today, but I’m going to look into the deal. From what I recall, President Trump is , at least peripherally, involved in the April real estate deal. Not that that is a bad thing.

I’m not sure what to think about it, because “nothing is as it seems”.

[TEXOKIE]

To: TEXOKIE
Under the Steinweigh, the struggle is real
130 posted on 8/22/2018, 1:23:07 PM by Aquamarine (Where we go one, we go ALL ~ Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
*texokie has been wondering where that strawberry went and has been waging a battle of outrageous proportions to snag it*

You know me so well! LOLOL!

[philman_36]

And by the way, civilians tried in military courts is unlawful and unconstitutional.

Yet, you say ...it is in the UCMJ... and that it does indeed cover
...a very narrow slice of civilians working ina war zone .

Where does "unlawful and unconstitutional" come into play?