Posted on 08/05/2018 10:45:44 AM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
YouTube Thoughts Not Bots Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Threadreader ImperatorRex A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Article Sundance Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
“Pay Attention” Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
I wonder if that definition is widely adopted. I always took "Q" and "QAnon" as synonymous. I think of the posters at /qresearch/ as plain "anon," and they refer to each other as "fags."
There is no confusion in the context of your post, you define and explain how you take those labels. IOW, I don't object to your defintions in the least. I just wonder what other groups in the public think those labels represent.
I strongly disagree.
I know a lot of good and honorable people.
For the most part the bulk of the trouble are the political appointees in my view.
Artemis Gordon, master of disguise?
And they have a roadside store with the sign:
Diesel Fried Chicken.
Any speculation on who?
I have no information based speculation. If it was an actual person, then I would suspect it was a prisoner, perhaps a soldier. No evidence to base that on, just a hunch.
I think that is very much a wait and see before believing. If true, I doubt it would ever get out because of the damage it might do to relationships.
:: Diesel Fried Chicken. ::
Now with lower sulfur for lower emissions!
Q
Generally no, but sometimes yes on a case-by-case basis.
The institution protects leakers by allowing the reporter to shield them from everybody. There are plenty of cases of reporters getting away with making things up out of whole cloth, so one would think that at least usually, the bosses are ignorant of the non-existence of the sources. Typically a sob-story with made up victim. See the movie "Meet John Doe."
Q seems nervous. He/They/She sent two more drops to basically set the table.
The case is about to be laid out. The evidence better be damning. The new posts are essentially saying the last 20 years of US rule has been a plot to destroy the US through a slow bleed.
Based on Q posts 1807 the spiderweb images of the multiple levels of communication between the fbi and the media, post 1808 listing the WikiLeaks info of reporters that were collaborating with the Hillary campaign, and the recent white house meeting with Trump and the NY times
Trump tweeted that the two discussed “the vast amounts of Fake News being put out by the media & how that Fake News has morphed into phrase, “Enemy of the People.” Sad!”
and Q post 1822
[Fake News]
Fake News collaborating and pushing knowingly false information?
Fake News KNOWINGLY FALSE narrative pushes.
I have no doubt we should be hearing more about this shortly.
~~~~~~~~~~~
In #813, ransomnote reminds us that my meme,
"Prerequisites for Draining the Swamp"
relates to your question...
TXnMA
Look forward to it
I saw a different theory that it was records from the first gulf war in 92 and the soldiers getting sick from depleted uranium rounds.
So, I searched “depleted uranium rounds” and Wiki gave me this:
also referred to in the past as Q-metal
Had to chuckle.
Excellent description.
I quibble with your distinction between Q and QAnon. I think that most of us regard those as two names for the same person/group. I think that what you are calling QAnon is what most of us are just calling the anons or autists.
As for FR, I think we have MANY important features for discussing Q:
1. much tamer, vulgarity free (for the most part). I would have said “family friendly” but there are a few very serious topics that we’ve been discussing here that cannot be considered family friendly due to their disturbing nature.
2. More friendly to newbies. This is one huge reason I think we need to make great efforts to welcome newbies and be careful with our accusations of “troll”. Real trolls will become obvious eventually. Most newbies are going to be overwhelmed, dazed, confused by the stunning revelations of Q. Questioning the truth of Q is “normal” on first exposure. Let’s do our best to be kind.
3. Easier to navigate. or maybe I’m just more accustomed to it.? 8ch can be difficult to navigate, especially from board to board.
https://twitter.com/ABCPolitics/status/1026631209043066881
Julian Assange’s attorney Jennifer Robinson tells @ABC News that Assange has said that the source of the leaked DNC emails “was not the Russian state and he has maintained that position throughout”
Actually, I'm not at all surprised to read that.
...and turning history on its head is only a part of the project the DS/left launched (JMHO) in the late 70's to try to entice 'Nam vets back to voting for their favored political candidates.
Not to mention (said the cynical old ex-sailor) rebuilding trust with all of those nasty "babyburners" who had just happened to have begun to hit their peak earning years.
I use my handle because of [BLEEP] like that along with many, many other things; most didn't directly affect me but destroyed/killed enough that I'll never, ever forget a damn second of those days or forgive those who've caused all that and then tried to lie their way out of it...
Guess that's why my first reaction to someone saying "Thank you for your service" is still a quick check on my six.
That's a workable theory too, but a couple of thoughts to keep in mind.
First, not all leaks of classified information rise to the level of criminal. Only certain select types of classified information carry risk of criminal prosecution on leaking. If the FBI is illegally snooping, and then leaks the substance of that snoop, the leak probably wouldn't be a crime.
Second, leaking, even non-criminal leaking, exposes the leaker to being fired or otherwise disciplined in a workplace way. So, leakers tend to want to do so without being identified. Declassification is not a good tool to get dirt out into the public.
Especially so from the confines of a prosecutor's office, where everything is meant to be kept out of public view to protect the innocent and to protect the investigation. Classified or not, the info a prosecutor is working with is supposed to be the prosecutor's secret.
I keep wondering about that. What is the “evidence” ?
The hard drive ? or the image of the hard drive mentioned earlier ? If the image, then that statement is probably true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.