Pinging just a few of you to a comment. Just so you see who’s doing what.
Pinging just a few of you to a comment. Just so you see who’s doing what.
~ ~ ~ ~
What comment are you pinging us to?
I’m under the baby grand in the Qanteen doing some proofreading for another FReeQ.
*texokie is also cleaning out Cats Pajamas’ cat box and providing grooming so she won’t get another hairball*
Re this remark: A crapweasel like Peter Stzrok can sit in front of a convened congressional panel and smirk because he knows that with this government he can do whatever the hell he wants and they can’t stop him.
I’m watching the YouTube of the testimony today. It’s a slow process because the sound and sight of PS is so revolting. Same for a few of the democrats.
If my hunches (mostly based on Q hints) are correct, then here’s what I think we’re seeing:
1. It’s all kabuki theater. Trump team has the goods on ALL of these guys. But certain information needs to be dragged out into the light where the average American will hear about it.
2. I’m only up to hour 2 of the testimony so far, but it seems clear to me that the theater is making the case for the left-leaning public to trust the Mueller investigation. They’re doing this by making Mueller sound like an anti-Trump democrat and therefore not someone whose investigation would help the President or hurt HRC and her ilk.
3. I would put the democrats into these main categories
a. absolute DS, filthy and corrupt
b. corrupt (maybe taking bribes, etc., but not total pervs), not part of the DS elite
c. utterly stupid (may or may not be taking bribes) who believe the party line they’ve been indoctrinated / conditioned to believe (Rs are racist, hate children, etc.) Probably does what he/she is told to do. Obviously reads from a script and clearly did not write his/her own script or questions.
d. honest democrats (not sure if any remain in this category in 2018)
(Actually the dirty Rs could also be put into a-c, with d modified as honest Rs.)
Watching the reactions to certain events in the PS testimony, I’d say those who seem to go into utter panic and meltdown mode are most likely to be in a higher group. Probably not in group (d).
I’ve considered the possibility that there are some in group (d) who COULD BE helping the white hats by pretending to be allied with PS, pretending to object to questions by Rs (esp. Gowdy). But I would bet that the vast majority of them are either panicked or stupidly taking the bait.
While Q is silent, it might be fun to try to categorize the Ds.
My guesses:
I’d go with (c) for Cummings. Nadler is either (a) or an excellent actor in category (d)
Strzok: either a or b.
True White hats: Gowdy, Goodlatte, Jordan
And I hope everyone ignores the troll. I see he has started cussing already. This, apparently, is one of their latest tricks.