Get Rod Rosenstain on it right away.
See how that works out for you, Judge President?
Just one more of many “judges” legislating from their bench who could use a good dragging down a rocky road behind an American made pick em up truck.
Amazing that they don’t even try to hide their political bias anymore. Should be grounds for impeachment.
SCOTUS just handed down a decision stating that the Executive branch has the authority to manage such things, did they not?
Just sling as much sh*t up against the wall, see what sticks, force the Administration to go to court in the hopes that during the delays, as many 3rd world savages as possible can come in and vote in our elections.
Ahhh, it's about the money. Always about the money.
Well, that's OUR money, Pinko.
Yuck Foo, Judge. Sick of this crap.
Trump not obligated to even read it.
The spirit of Cut ‘em Loose Bruce is alive and well in the Big Apple.
Yet another federal district judge, in a progressive jurisdiction, assumes that they have power over the presidency. Justice Thomas has already told these district courts to stop making these Universal declarations.
The purpose of the census is to count the citizens, not those passing through. The question is essential.
Also, ask if upholds the Constitution of the USA. Answer no - deported the next day.
Congress needs to impeach and remove this judge as as lesson to the rest not to usurp power.
I am so sick of these out-of-contrl judges.
Q: Is there any other country on the planet that allows foreigners to vote in national elections, anyone know?
Just curious.
Just sayin'.
California stands to lose two House seats and electoral votes if there’s a citizenship question. That’s all this about.
People say illegals can’t vote, but there are essentially two Democrats from California alone right now in our House of Representatives who represent illegal aliens, not to mention the two electoral votes Clinton received from them (again, from California alone.)
Yes. The question should be asked.
The number of congressmen/congresswoman should only apply to number of legal citizens and resources should be allocated only to those here legally.
Looks like this judge picked the wrong day to quit doing meth, heroin, sniffing glue, drinking a quart of whiskey a day, and smoking pot on the job.
Starting in 1970, questions about citizenship were included in the long-form questionnaire but not the short form. For instance, in 2000, those who received the long form were asked, “Is this person a CITIZEN of the United States?”
Later, the census added the American Community Survey, conducted every year and sent to 3.5 million households. It began being fully implemented in 2005. It asks many of the same questions as the census long-form surveys from 1970 to 2000, including the citizenship question.
Sanders said that in 2010 the citizenship question was removed. In fact, there was no long form that year — it had been replaced by the annual American Community Survey. The decennial census form asked just 10 questions.
...if the 2020 census form does ultimately ask about citizenship status, it will be the first time the question will be asked of all U.S. households since 1950.
The Left is hiding the historical information by conflating all US Households with whether citizenship was a question on the census. Only the 2010 census omitted the question because that Census omitted the long form entirely.
Federal judge-president Jesse Furman can eat a pile of Mitt.
is busy burying the MISSING computer server.
It’s about time a POTUS says now, and tells a judge they can either pound sand or take their complaint directly to the Supreme Court where we can argue directly on the issue of a judges right to interfere with the executive branch function of the Census, qusstioning any “Constitutional” issue the judge thinks they have.