Q Anon: 6/27/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/27/18 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

"Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?"

The following video (13 min.) is by far the most popular FReeper recommended source of information for those new to Q Anon.
Q - The Plan To Save The World

The following is an excellent overview written by sundance at Conservative Tree House.
Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency…

The following video (4 min.) provides a very quick overview.
Who is Q - video available on Youtube

FReeper reviewers have given the following PDF a thumbs-up.
The Book of Q (PDF)

Where to find Q?

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on a few different verified websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyberattack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) sometime use unfamiliar acronyms, references, names and locations of significance. Swordmaker maintains a list of these terms to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list, called the Lexicon, of is stored on Swordmaker's profile page and he posts the latest updates within the thread. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Click on the silver 'Q' below to view Swordmaker's Lexicon of Q terms.

QProofs provide evidence that Q Anon is a legitimate source of information, has access to President Trump, and is serving President Trump's agenda:
https://www.qproofs.com/home.html

To find Q Anon threads on Free Republic, search for key word "Qanon" using the search window in the top right corner of the forum.

Finding Q on the web

I will be compiling the recommendations FReepers have sent me regarding good sources of reliable Q information on the web. Here's a few links to get started.

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic

Dustin Nemos is a long time favorite of mine. He covers other content (e.g., bitcoin) so I recommend you check the titles for topics of interest. He usually includes a few overview statements on the thumbnail to his videos to give you an idea of the Q content being covered. I really appreciate the links he provides under his videos. He's good so...Youtube banned him for three months. However, he's returned to youtube here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ7VgW7XgJQjDEPnOR-Q0Qw

ImperatorRex on Twitter has a solid fan base - he's so good he keeps being suspended. Hopefully, he's still posting here:
https://twitter.com/_ImperatorRex_

Some of the history behind The Swamp

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Resources for the way forward

Need a meme to help red-pill your friends and neighbors? Little Jeremiah has posted a thread and continues to invite us to post memes we find in one conveneient FR thread. Here's the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3648238/posts?page=297

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected:
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the following link to send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

Don't like what's going on in Congress right now? Call them right now and tell them (name, phone number and phone numbers of committees to which they belong):
https://www.contactingcongress.org

This thread post is under revision (updated information). Your patience is greatly appreciated.

[TEXOKIE]

LOL!

[JockoManning]

Methinks your hair catching on fire is undoubtedly because of the high-octain fuel running through your brain in your tireless ORACLE writing sessions.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Well, I watched the video. A bunch of conspiratorial junk with one outstanding fact that raises doubt.

There’s an awful lot of suppositions and innuendo about generations of Nazis who controlled Hitler, and that Sirhan was MK ULtra’d while some nameless Israeli assassin shot RFK in the sight of a full room. BUT:

The most interesting thing in the video is that the plane just dove out of the sky in the last minutes of its approach. That does sound weird. Even bubble instrumentation would indicate that the plane was far out of its previously established descent path. Perhaps it was sabotage of the plane. There probably wasn’t enough left of the plane to discover damage after it was pulled out of the water. I’m not a pilot, so I don’t know what the “best” way would be to produce such a result, but it seems possible.

I could easily see the Clintons motivated to produce such an accident if JFK Jr had let his political intentions leak out.

[JockoManning]

Probably won’t get to the report. About 48 hours of youtubes to listen to. LOL. I forget what the most probable destroyer was . . . a missile from a Navy ship that “misfired?” Yeah, right. or what?

[little jeremiah]

Is Gen. Kelly retired or still in mil?

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Didn’t we hear, not long ago, that Trump and MadDog were on the outs and not speaking to each other?

Maybe we should watch were Mattis lands, too?

[Hostage]

Because legal terms in legal theory require precise definitions, the process of law cannot be executed without such precision, else the rule of law breaks down.

Notions of ‘allegiance’, ‘patriotism’, ‘loyalty’ are all amorphous in a variety of settings.

But certain positions in society need a visible, recordable, certifiable record of fact. Taking an Oath is the means to establish such fact in the context of allegiance.

Americans agree to pledge allegiance to the Flag or stand for its National Anthem. There is no law requiring such conformance. Although some kneel in protest of such symbolic acts, there is no law requiring them to do one or the other. But there is a social compact. There is a right for Americans to shun and disapprove of such kneelers to the point where the commerce is disrupted and the franchise leaders move to stanch the bleeding to their bottom lines. Pragmatism weighs in favor of social compacts.

But these are acts of populist America whereas certain other acts can harm the Republic and these harmful acts must be defined and dealt with. Hence, laws and affirmations by oaths are vital.

[Cats Pajamas]

bookmark

[Melian]

The Oracle gave me two thoughts:

Re White Squall: this is a movie about young men on a fateful cruise. It uses several of Q’s maxims/symbols. What if the idea for Q and the Plan began with young men traveling together? Did Rodgers go to school or serve with any other names we know? Perhaps the young friends saw what was happening and began to plan back then? Or were with Trump in military school?

Re the therapist name in the files: recall that Rodgers saved proof by intentionally misfiling it. Perhaps we can find the therapists’ names by looking for “mistakes” in filing or labeling?

[generally]

>> Generally is VERY perceptive.

Thank you!

I suspect we think along the same lines, so right back atcha!

I HAVE had doubts about Q at times. And I’ve also been accused of being a concern troll (not on the Q threads, IIRC, but on other threads). I think doubt is genuine and VALUABLE! We SHOULD have doubt. It means we’re not just swallowing everything that’s shoveled at us.

I try to be careful with noobs and answer their doubts because I try to put myself in their position. If you are new to Q, it’s very overwhelming and you are bound to have questions and doubts. We need to offer data and facts to those people so they can decide for themselves about Q. If we only mock them or accuse them of being concern trolls, then we drive them away. That does not help us!

Even if they really are trolls, they serve several valuable purposes. The sudden appearance of trolls tells us we’re over the target! They also force us to think and argue intelligently.

Differences between trolls and honest questioners: The questioners question to learn. The trolls question to cast doubt. They argue for the sake of arguing. Honest Questioners are much more likely to concede a point. A troll just shifts to a new topic, gets angry, attacks, name-calls, or starts spewing nonsense.

One suggestion for both is to ask them to read first. You can learn a lot if you read all the Q posts or even just the last few weeks’ worth. Read a few hundred thread posts. Or a few thousand! If you’re not willing to do a little work on your own, then you will probably forever be one of the sheeple.

That doesn’t mean don’t ask questions! I ask PLENTY of questions. Including stupid ones. Last night I asked what the “ultimate question” was referred to by Q1643. Still not entirely clear on that, but I think one of my early guesses about “what is Q” is pretty close. I can occasionally be stupid about some things that seem obvious to others. I’m definitely not trolling!

Hang in there FReeQs! I think we are sooooooo close!

[generally]

Outstanding find!

So excited to see this!!!

[hoosiermama]

Shame someone isn’t closer and needs a hair cut. The local barbershop knows everything. Our local barber, Leon is very conservative. When told that Q knew all he said. “Not more than the local barber!”

Out of town news needs to get their hair cut!

[Cboldt]

Well, that was nice, but doesn't advance toward a reasoned conclusion to our disagreement.

What is the support for the contention that a person must have sworn an oath of allegiance to the US, that is, have it on formal record, in order to be charged with treason?

I've offered Tokyo Rose as a counter to that point, and now offer Axis Sally as an additional case where I see no evidence of affirming allegiance (taking an oath), yet the defendant was charged with and convicted of treason. You have not respnding to this aspect of my half-baked point of view.

I understand the point that some evidence is better than other evidence, meaning affirmation of allegiance certainly establishes owing allegiance.

My contention is that, as a matter of law, all US citizens owe allegiance to the US, whether or not they took an oath of allegiance. Establish citizenship (birth cert is evidence), and the duty (owing) of allegiance is established.

[No_Doll_i]

You do understand you are on the Q thread, right.

What does this have to do with Q?

You are VERY rapidly becoming quite tiresome.

[Jack Black]

Nicely put.

[little jeremiah]

Imho bad aspects of gov “allowed” many of the shootings to happen, rather than directly caused them. Obviously Waco and Ruby Ridge were directly caused. Oklahoma City is in a category by itelf, again imho. But the Sandy Hook and others mentioned would have been prevented by a half way decent gov.

[little jeremiah]

Very astute comment.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

I had the same thought but realized that old pig Harvey wasn’t charged with pedo garbage.

[generally]

Don’t take my word for this because I’m not an expert.

Yes, you’re correct about the big investors like Soros being able to move the market.

But if I understand correctly, Trump has seized the assets of a lot of these big players for exactly that reason. He’s preventing them from deliberately crashing the market and damaging the rest of us.

Yes, I think a small group really has that much power. Or more precisely “had”. I think no more. IMO the market has been a DS rigged game for a long time. Maybe it will be more “real” now.

Again, just my opinion. Also my opinion - I think we WILL see some market disruption, but I’m expecting it to even out.

Disclosure: After 9/11, my instincts said to sell and then buy back after the plummet. But I saw people saying it was unpatriotic to sell, that selling was “letting the terrorists win”. So I didn’t sell. I rode it out. I’m ok, but I would have been WAY better off if I’d sold. Was I patriotic or just suckered? Or both? IDK.

[Snowybear]

> Trump and Mattis not getting along.

Absolute fake news.