Q Anon: 6/24/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/24/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?"

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

Who is Q - video available on Youtube

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

QProofs provide evidence that Q Anon is a legitimate source of information, has access to President Trump, and is serving President Trump's agenda:
https://www.qproofs.com/home.html

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronyms to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Need a meme to help red-pill your friends and neighbors? Little Jeremiah has posted a thread and continues to invite us to post memes we find in one conveneient FR thread. Here's the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3648238/posts?page=297

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected:
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the following link to send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[Jack Black]

Witch Hunt Update

Bloomberg is reporting that:

Mueller Poised to Zero In on Trump-Russia Collusion Allegations

This is pretty weak-sauce as far as reporting goes. The two reporters claim to have leaks from Mueller's team (that's the news here) that he "is preparing to accelerate his probe into possible collusion between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russians who sought to interfere in the 2016 election"

That's sort of laughable, given that he's been at it for 15 months and hasn't bought one charge that has anything to do with either collusion (not a crime) nor obstruction (as construed (ie: firing James Comey, not a crime. And after the OIG report that showed that Comey was, at best a boob, it seems completely untenable to try to put Trump on trial for obstruction for firing an incompetent. But, it's Mueller who has already indicted a ham sandwich, so who knows?

Mueller and his team of prosecutors and investigators have an eye toward producing conclusions -- and possible indictments -- related to collusion by fall, said the person, who asked not to be identified. He’ll be able to turn his full attention to the issue as he resolves other questions, including deciding soon whether to find that Trump sought to obstruct justice.

The article then degenerates into a list of every Trump associate who has ever spoken to any Russian in any context, which totals 13. Not any new news in that, and they are (of course) ignoring the news since they first reported the story that most of the contacts appear to have been instigated as a counter-intel operation by the FBI for the purpose of entrapping them.

Then again Team Trump isn't doing a great job of telling that story yet either, including the left hand (Sessions, Rosenstein) not letting the right hand (Nunes, Gowdy) see the docs that prove the counter-intel dangle operation and therefore the existence of an attempted Deep State Coup. (which isn't over, and if Trump is removed prematurely will actually have worked).

I think Mueller's investigation is a witch hunt, but that doesn't change the fact that it is still happening.

And lets not forget: the purpose of a witch hunt is to catch a witch, and burn her. And many were!

Trump is still being hunted by his enemies, and the enemies have shown a lot more ability to draw blood than Team Trump in their visible counter-investigation.(The hidden levels that Q describes are mostly not yet visible, to date.)

So this remains worrisome to me, regardless of how low my opinion is of Mueller or the veracity of the claims being made by he and his minions, which I rate as also low.

Lies can harm Trump, just as fake witch hunts can hurt those "witches", even if they are just ordinary women.

[EasySt]

No reply to this, Bagster?

You must be out lifting... ;-)

[TEXOKIE]

I vaguely recall another Q post that stated or hinted that white hats were surreptitiously embedded with Antifa etc.

~ ~ ~ ~

That seems to clang a dim bell with me too, AZLiberty. Very comforting!

[TEXOKIE]

Thank you so much for the links, Lady Doc. What I was recalling was speculation at the time of the drop. Data certainly may have refined since then.

[EasySt]

At least she’ll be getting additional protection now.

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3666323/posts

[JockoManning]

GRRR. May God have mercy on all of good heart and may the perpetrators be speedily caught and punished.

[JockoManning]

Just got a reply from a liberal . . . character . . . gal. I'd sent the two paragraphs that included:

Progressive Socialists are nothing if not "blindered" like carriage horses.

I don't think she was able to read more than 2 lines before the cursing explosiveness of supermouth Maxine spewed forth.

They really are incredibly BLIND. Stupifyingly blind.

[JockoManning]

Worth repeating:

I guess
it’s time toss
a pair of
Nitrile gloves
in the cars.

[JockoManning]

Largely agree.

[JockoManning]

May Mueller and his complicit globalist liberal hidiot stooges fall in the pit they are trying so vainly to dig for POTUS.

[bagster]

Here are the social misfits:

Yep. That's them.

They're still mad they got their lunch money took.

Bagster

[Typelouder]

Tucker just showed a Jet Blue plane on the tarmac at JFK surrounded by scores of police cars. Police went onto the aircraft. No other details yet...

[sockmonkey]

In your post #698, you have posted images of Blessed Simon of Trent.
Am I missing something? You know the backstory?

[bagster]

so, this basically a take-off on Gilbert’s and Lewis’s screed at the end of “revenge of the nerds” ?

I honestly don't remember the screed, but probably yes. Revenge of the nerds was one of a long line of cultural "signals" that the weird and different were the good guys and the "normal" and successful were the bad guys.

That has been the message in our culture for a while now. No wonder being "normal" is now defined as hate.

Bagster

[TEXOKIE]

https://youtu.be/6cYZ8dUgPuU

THANK YOU FOR THE LINK - sent to a very dear person who is just learning about Q!

[bagster]

even if they are just ordinary women.

If?

Bagster

[Jack Black]

Vanity Fair appears to be getting the same information, but they dress it up in a more realistic headline:

ROBERT MUELLER COULD HAVE AN OCTOBER SURPRISE FOR THE G.O.P.

The special counsel is expected to reach a conclusion—and produce possible indictments—right around the midterm elections this fall.

Over the past few months, Donald Trump has tempered his threats to fire Robert Mueller, recognizing that he can just as easily undermine the special counsel in the court of public opinion. The strategy has been crude but, like a 19th-century bone saw, brutally effective. Rather than involve himself with personnel issues at the Justice Department, which Trump’s lawyers have surely advised him could be seen as further evidence of obstruction, the president has constructed an alternate reality in which the F.B.I. was part of a rabid conspiracy to prevent his election and the only “real collusion” was committed by his Democratic enemies.

He has tested the bounds of his constitutional powers, asserting unprecedented executive privileges including legal immunity, the ability to pardon himself, and to shut down federal investigations. As the Russia investigation races toward a conclusion, however, Trump and his Republican allies are due for a reckoning.

Mueller is reportedly winding down his obstruction probe—an interview with Trump is likely to be the capstone to that investigation—and moving on to whether there was an underlying crime to cover up.

So, there you have it: straight, no chaser. The purpose of the Mueller investigation has always been to "Get Trump", and at this point it's a two-fer, they are going to "Get Trump" and throw the midterms in the process.

And as the tone of the article demonstrates, They Are Damn Excited About It !!!

[bitt]

re #809,

[MomwithHope]

bookmark

[Jack Black]

Good point. I may have watched too many horror movies.

even if when they are just ordinary women