Posted on 05/28/2018 9:46:24 AM PDT by ransomnote
"According to The Hill, John Giacalone, who led the Clinton investigation for the first seven months, will reportedly expose former President Barack Obama and fired FBI Director James Comey for allowing Clinton to skirt charges......."
Please wake me when this happens. Yawn!
Just like those emails that couldn’t be recovered...Oooops, yeah we’ve got them judge.
Their problem will be that doing Secure/Classified government business on/through/with an unauthorized server (mixed with “personal” documents about yoga and grandchildren) make that server and EVERY OTHER SERVER IT TOUCHED part of the 1st Amendment public domain. [Even the DNC server.]
What does that mean? It ^doesn’t^ mean that Twitter and Facebook should be regulated ((Look! Squirrel!). It means that all of the documents on those servers (remember, we’ve got it all) can be obtained by anyone via FOIA, WITHOUT redactions. NatSec was compromised by their use so any plea for redactions to avoid NatSec compromise are moot, thanks to the recent ruling against Trump/Twitter!
How do we get this info to the public (legally)?
ACLJ and others better get busy with their requests now.
This could get YUGE.
ValJar has not only unmasking culpability but 45m phone calls with Schiff, and now Haitian child transport ties. Maybe the flood of photos has to come from everywhere to keep deep state spinning on who to intercept.
dream much?
Only out loud
Maybe Moving Masters (specialists in electronic and computer moving) could be charged with facilitating grand theft and larceny of federal equipment.
AG Sessions pick up the courtesy phone....oh wait...line dead.
Have you ever built something out of wood and, half way through, you realize that some of the “throw away” items could be used again in the same project?
Possibly, not every question posed by Q was rhetorical?
And if they moved it outside the WH jurisdiction....isn’t that crossing state lines.....call the feds....oh wait....another bad line.
Perhaps you saw Moving Masters employees smokin’ a doob in the back of the truck. Maybe now he’ll take your call.
Don Jr. doesn’t have clearances, you are thinking of Jared Kushner. And I don’t know who he uses for security, but probably SS.
Not holding my breath.
MG Bannister. Interesting possibly related point: There is an ENORMOUS amount of cyberwarfare in the Ft. Drum area.
Roseanne. Thanks for the FB info. I don’t think what she did was PC or savvy for a public figure, but it was far less inflammatory than most of what the left is always saying about Trump or anyone else on the right. Have her critics never watched a late night talk show or just about anything on the “comedy” channel?
Even the conservative talk show hosts are distancing themselves from Roseanne. That seems sad and cowardly. Ironically, I’m not a huge fan of Roseanne, nor am I a fan of putting people down for how they look, but I will defend her on this point. I’ll say the “ape” implication wasn’t nice if she was talking about appearances. (How many other comedians make fun of people for how they look. Take that away and some would be out of business.) “Ape” may have been spot on if she was talking about intelligence. I’ll defend her right to say it. The MB part of the comment was exactly on target. Is that what people are really afraid of? I refuse to get on the Roseanne-bashing bandwagon.
Maybe the conservative radio talkers need to preserve their jobs. They could do that by shutting up on the topic instead of throwing RB under the bus. Those same talkers have been silent about the 0vomit BC for 10 years, too.
fyi
Not all records are required to be released under the FOIA. Congress established nine exemptions from disclosure for certain categories of information to protect against certain harms, such as an invasion of personal privacy, or harm to law enforcement investigations. The FOIA authorizes agencies to withhold information when they reasonably foresee that disclosure would harm an interest protected by one of these nine exemptions.
The nine exemptions are described below.
Exemption 1: Information that is classified to protect national security.
Exemption 2: Information related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency.
Exemption 3: Information that is prohibited from disclosure by another federal law.
Exemption 4: Trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is confidential or privileged.
Exemption 5: Privileged communications within or between agencies, including those protected by the:
1. Deliberative Process Privilege (provided the records were created less than 25 years before the date on which they were requested)
2. Attorney-Work Product Privilege
3. Attorney-Client Privilege
Exemption 6: Information that, if disclosed, would invade another individual’s personal privacy.
Exemption 7: Information compiled for law enforcement purposes that:
7(A). Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings
7(B). Would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication
7(C). Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy
7(D). Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source
7(E). Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law
7(F). Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual
Exemption
8: Information that concerns the supervision of financial institutions.
Exemption 9: Geological information on wells.
That’s an interesting route to explore. Hadn’t thought of that.
That is by far the best Valerie Jarret research I’ve ever come across. Jarret seems so manufactured that I wonder if that’s even her real name.
The digital age produces enormous amounts of information that need to constantly transferred to newer media. I have a pile of zip discs and no zip player and no computer with software to read them. I have diskettes with system and file backups. Is it worth my finding an disk player and a archived system that has software to read them? Do I have anything on there worth saving? Maybe some pictures, but at this point I am not going to pursue them and they are lost. ("Πάντα ῥεῖ" everything flows).
If something is really important, material printed on acid free paper does last, if you can keep insects away. (Think linen or papyrus paper in St Catherine's monastery.) Fired Sumerian clay tablets last! (Yes, he sold 15 sheep for a tun of olive oil and 1 amphora of new wine!)
I suppose if something is really (Really!) important get acid free paper and long lasting ink and print it out. I think that the Library of Congress requires, or possibly recommends that the first print copy of a new book supplied to them be printed on Linen to avoid it disintegrating over time like wood pulp paper.
Color on photographs can fade with time. (Mine have...) make certain you take some black and white family pictures. They will last longer.
Oh well. Time to downsize coming up, when my possesions will join the great river of used and discarded things. Home today. Off to do some errands now.
So far, it is a good act.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.