[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Just like those emails that couldn’t be recovered...Oooops, yeah we’ve got them judge.

Their problem will be that doing Secure/Classified government business on/through/with an unauthorized server (mixed with “personal” documents about yoga and grandchildren) make that server and EVERY OTHER SERVER IT TOUCHED part of the 1st Amendment public domain. [Even the DNC server.]

What does that mean? It ^doesn’t^ mean that Twitter and Facebook should be regulated ((Look! Squirrel!). It means that all of the documents on those servers (remember, we’ve got it all) can be obtained by anyone via FOIA, WITHOUT redactions. NatSec was compromised by their use so any plea for redactions to avoid NatSec compromise are moot, thanks to the recent ruling against Trump/Twitter!

How do we get this info to the public (legally)?

ACLJ and others better get busy with their requests now.
This could get YUGE.

[rolling_stone]

dream much?

[darbymcgill]

How do we get this info to the public (legally)?

So, was the harassment of Trump on twitter a setup from the get-go? Did they want this to happen? Was his harasser working with Trump? Lot's of questions come to mind if part of the plan was to expose the socials as utilities. That had to start a while ago... Sheesh..