Q Anon: (4/26/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 4/26/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Each live stream video remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronym definitions to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[bitt]

that’s what they’re doing with our infants...

[Lopeover]

MOAB. Hillary and/or Obama perp walk, in my humble opinion.

[stylin19a]

thanks. I get it now.
I learn so much from Freepers.
I didn’t know of that site.
thanks again

[Cboldt]

-- No push back on that....coincidence? seems very orchestrated by who? --

By Trump, or Trump and Sessions working as a team.

You have to consider that the black hats are, at least at first, pretty good at hiding. I think Rosenstein is an unwilling white hat in this scheme. He had to write the fire Comey memo (FBI Director reports to DAG) if ordered/asked by Sessions. And as cover, it serves him well. Yeah, I'm with you guys, fire Comey - meanwhile Rosenstein's handling of Mueller is an unknown, other than there is a pretty good expectation Mueller is going to go hard against Trump, so that a clean bill from Mueller has street cred.

[bitt]

see #1804

[Cboldt]

8ch.net is not suitable for work. LOADS of pr0n, or close to it.

No links to 8ch.net, for sure. I don't know if a plaintext URL is allowed, but as far as I am concerned none should be necessary because the 8ch.net original material is one click away from the aggregator sites such as http://qanonposts.com/

[eldoradude]

BTFO - from dictionary.com - BTFO

What does BTFO mean?
To BTFO is a vulgar internet acronym for “blown the f*ck out.” It’s used to emphasize an extraordinary or embarrassing defeat, especially in a sports or a political argument.

I think this definition fits the context of the Q-drop better. More -

Where does BTFO come from?
BTFO is short for “blown the f*ck out.” In gaming, its meaning is similar to “pwned” or “rekt.” If an individual or a team is BTFO, it means that they have been spectacularly defeated. A BTFO can also refer to someone losing a debate, particularly an online one.

Since the 2016 election, BTFO has become widely used by the alt-right online when they feel an opponent to their viewpoint gets “owned.” They might refer to leftist demonstrators getting BTFO if a protest gets broken up, or a critic of the Trump administration getting BTFO if evidence surfaces that counters their argument. In April 2017, for example, a picture made the rounds online suggesting far fewer New England Patriots football players visited the Trump White House in honor of their Super Bowl Victory than did in 2015 for President Obama. It turned out that many of the 2017 players were in attendance but not in the picture. Trump supporters responded by saying, among other things, “fake news BTFO.”

[greeneyes]

That’s interesting. I seem to remember reading somewhere on a thread that it’s not possible to do that. I wonder if we can do the same to Russia’s planes?

[reasonisfaith]

At this point I’m drawing a blank on what to think of Comey. I hadn’t considered Comey as deep mole until Swordmaker’s post.

A bit of reflection is starting to steer me away from Comey as white hat, now I’m refocusing on Mueller. Q is painting him as the wild card white hat. And there was talk a while back about Mueller being the one who was held hostage by the Clintons/deep state.

But who knows?

[STARLIT]

I agree with you're decision of him.

[bitt]

https://www.lawfareblog.com/dont-read-too-much-jump-rejected-fisa-applications

interesting..

[Scott from the Left Coast]

The future is never guaranteed, however, we do know the surest guarantee of that second term is if the lives of Americans improve...if they are becoming more prosperous and if they feel more secure economically and physically. And in the nearer term, having a Congress that is somewhat supportive of a “success agenda” is also important...and also is more likely I’d the American people feel that “all boats are rising” on a higher tide. Serving the people, meeting their needs and wants takes a higher, or more immediate I should say, priority...in my perspective anyway.

[Melian]

There were 4 players, and one was “J’s Phone.”

[STARLIT]

I think so too. Russia made sure they were no where around during the bombing..Also making sure they didn't engage by mistake. This even the Syrians noticed and reported ALL over.

[Cats Pajamas]

Generally,

Can I get more clarification on that? It is most important?

[huldah1776]

Personally, the enemy suspecting nothing doesn’t fly with me. With infiltration even here at FR and other conservative sites, there is no way they don’t get Q’s posts. They probably know what he’s posting because they know what they did!

I could see if the enemies boots didn’t know, like different cells not knowing about each other but the ones at the top? They’re just trying to cover their butts because hildabeast is not president, the DOJ is infiltrated as is every other DC department. Firing the heads will make the chicken bodies run around though! LOL

[txhurl]

C, after Petraeus and his girlie got busted FIVE YEARS AGO using drafts to comm, you don’t think NSA perked up and put some coders on it?

[little jeremiah]

I agree with your assessment. I do not think, nor have thought, that the Q team needed feedback or research from anons to make their case.

“We have it all.”

That says it all for me. IMHO Q asks questions to get anons/normies thinking, delving, so they will know themselves, and not just read more “stuff to swallow”. To get anons/normies convinced by their own knowledge, not just sit and be fed. But we have been fed a lot! And to educate others as you stated.

I think it is a wrong assumption that the Q team doesn’t have all the info, intel and assets they need; IMHO what they are depending on is the right timing, the winding up of investigations, and then the human “free will” factor. Including events that they (and maybe no one person) is in control of.

[little jeremiah]

How can Mueller go hard against Trump when there was no collusion or other crime committed in the Russia collusion regard?

[Cboldt]

Thanks for that link. I was going to go looking at some point.

My sense is that nearly all or maybe literally all of that action, back and forth, is routine, mostly unchanged from Obama admin. I doubt that amount of FISA action would be generated against deep state.

Ponder this. If you thought a judge assigned to FISC was a foreign agent, would you get a warrant? LOL. Hell no!! Same goes if you suspect a person inside the DOJ side of the FISA process. I don't know how compartmented that work is, but if not compartmented, then you would avoid the risk of tipping off the target.