Posted on 04/20/2018 5:42:51 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. Today, only Qanonposts.com is working for me but weeks ago I was advised that it was hacked:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump
Thank you for sharing that, very enlightening.
In a word, "yes."
Suit is against Russia, Wikileaks, and last, the Trump campaign. Plaintiff has the burden of production of evidence and of proof to make their case. Both sides are entitled to discovery.
What I wonder about the pre-planning is did team Trump just "know" and plan to defend (good chance that is the case, DEMs sued in Watergate too), or is somebody on the DEM side pushing to expose the same filth and garbage that Trump is (also possible, see Bernie bots).
Wikipedia . . . here is the reference
She began her career in soaps working for Irna Phillips. Under her tutelage, Nixon was a writer on Woman in White and As the World Turns, and was head writer for Search for Tomorrow, Guiding Light, and Another World.[5]
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Thanks. Missed that.
Was that on the Nixon Wikipedia page? I had not gotten that far. Had looked at the Wikipedia page on ATWT, and then saw a soap industry web site, but did not directly look at Nixon.
Alrighty, then! NIXON WAS INVOLVED - not creator, but involved.
*texokie dies gracefully on this hill*
:-D
Yes, MAGA
looks like she added something like a disclaimer to her last thread unroll - “my opinions, blah blah”..
Different audiences. There is a HUGE range of awareness across the pubic. Until you examine the degree of awareness in enough people from enough places and different backgrounds, you have no real appreciation for how diverse "awareness" is.
I never worry about something not appearing on the chat shows. There is only so much time in a day. It is common for big news to come out a week or a month after the fact.
Talk of a counter suit. Good or Bad idea?
re: your link to podesta emails at wikileaks in #977, about 1/4 of way down, iii is a ‘wendy clark’:
“What:
Mechanically, the story will have three basic components. First, a list of names that we agree upon beforehand that we will give to a reporter on background, both policy people and campaign people. Second, some information provided on background that explains what is happening and why and third, a quote on-the-record that affirms all of this in an official capacity, making clear that this is a sanctioned story.
1) Names:
a. Policy*
i. Joe Stiglitz
ii. Paul Volcker
* More names available if and when it’s helpful. And we should revisit if and how to give people a heads up beforehand.
b. Campaign
i. John, Joel, and Robby are already out there
ii. Teddy Goff?
iii. Wendy Clark?”
I am certainly no legal anything. But yes, in the long run it will be good. DISCOVERY will bury them!
RE: Trump tweets
*non-existent sources and a drunk/drugged up loser who hates Michael*
Who is this? Do we know?
Good idea, IMO. This is civil court. Team Trump can sue for defamataion. This gets away from "collusion is not illegal" standard, and into reputation. There is tons of evidence of what claims were made, and burden shifts to defendant to show the claims were either true, or parody. Parody is out the window ...
LOL!
the way these posts drop fast and furiously, I just ping people to the start of the drops and then they’re on their own,..(while I selfishly read myself, lol)
thanx for link bob
Cameras warming up...are they still on 60's era vacuum tube technology...
Just coordinating the talking points and video shots with their bosses at MSM.
Here is a theory for consideration...
Q makes a point about pet names for the individual, and Wendy seems to be one of them. What if that nickname was given to Maggie Nixon by Obama based on Wendy the “The Good Little Witch”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendy_the_Good_Little_Witch
Also consider from the article on the Obamas Vacation they stayed at the Blue Heron Farm which included Horses and had previously been a retreat for the Clintons. From the original article about the Obamas eating at the restaurant he asked Maggie what she liked, and she said “horseback rides”
Let that sink in as a “grooming” activity and an unguarded response out of context from a child of say 12 yrs has experienced....
Rolling ahead look at the photo of her older that is on the QAnon board in a “Alice in Wonderland: costume with a lot of unsavory folks around her, Fantasy land, down the “rabbit hole”
Fast forward to the plane crash in Scottsdale where Mariah “Sunshine” was one of the victims
Q Responds thusly
Apr 20 2018 22:12:34
Q
!xowAT4Z3VQ
1122995
>>1122741
Over the target.
Expand further.
Wendy.
HUSSEIN.
Mack.
AS.
https://www.wehoville.com/2018/04/12/west-hollywoodss-mariah-sunshine-coogan-identified-victim-scottsdale-plane-crash/
Open source.
Q
So the little girl at 12 I believe in her later “personality” as Sunshine” (pet name as per Q) died with others to keep her from talking about what has happened to her along the way
Including her being involved with Alefantis along the way via her mother and many other unsavory things
Just a theory but it all fits together
Thought??
Seems to have changed with Win 10. On my Win 8 keyboard one of the six buttons upper right said 'screen copy', 'print screen' or similar. Now, to the right of the space bar, is a darkened key labeled 'fn' which apparently does not stand for 'fun' which is pushed along with one of the aforementioned six buttons now labeled 'insert' as well as 'prt scr'... at least it is so on my Win 10 keyboard. sigh If you have a notebook, laptop or tablet sans keybord you will have to ask someone more intelligent than moi.
Interesting, explains why they would go to the extreme to burn witches at the stake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.