Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: (3/28/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration
we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/28/2018 | FReepers, Vanity

Posted on 03/28/2018 7:15:36 PM PDT by ransomnote

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected



If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bs; conspiracytrash; cult; fantasy; flamewar; ibumpedmehead; notagain; pleasestop; q; qanon; qatheist; qatheists; qbs; qcult; qistroll; qtroll; qtrolls; russianpropagandists; russianpuppets; russianstooges; russiasucks; suchbs; vikingkitty; whythis; zotplease
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,881-1,885 next last
To: edzo4
Corsi specifically said Q is Army intelligence

That cant be true. That random fell over there says Q is some righ Gay media dude. C'mon, man. Who ya gonna believe?

741 posted on 03/29/2018 6:48:25 PM PDT by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 736 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Your post is a bit rambling, not sure if you’re being serious.

I know it’s easy to get into a jocular mood on these threads, but this is serious.


742 posted on 03/29/2018 6:49:25 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 728 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
-- When I wrote reports for Internal Control or Procedures, it was standard to refer to the person as their title - not their name ie CEO, COO, Supervisor etc. --

Sessions refers to Wray by name. Rather than try to state my impression, which might influence yours, read Sessions' letter of march 29, looking for references to people and positions.

I was paying attention to signs of cooperation (or not) or division of oversight between Sessions/Huber and Rosenstein/Mueller sort of thing.

743 posted on 03/29/2018 6:51:08 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 714 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Let me assure you, goodman. I am completely serious in that post. It makes perfect sense to me. I'm sorry you don't follow my style. If I had used stronger prose, the prose that I "feel", the pissed off would have probably been more apparent. I am trying to keep the dragon from rising more and more these days.

I feel like that dude is trying to damage the Q program, this thread, this forum and by extension, this very nation and yes, the entire world. Q is important. Very bloodydamn important.

Was that serious enough for you? I'm gonna log off. I shouldn post when I'm pissed off. Later, all.

744 posted on 03/29/2018 6:58:37 PM PDT by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 742 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

Tea party caught the eye off FBI/NSA in 2008-9. Spooks signed up on all the conservative boards and awaited their assignment.


745 posted on 03/29/2018 7:00:10 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 732 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Gato

Per their usual modus operandi the “confidential informant” was probably an FBI agent provocateur and it took the guy 8 months the convince the cletus’ that the only way those somalis can be stopped is if they did something themselves and then provided them with plans and material sources.

Remember, this is the same side that admitted in court they buried incriminating shit in Richard Jewels backyard to bust him unjustly and ended up driving him to an early grave...


746 posted on 03/29/2018 7:02:02 PM PDT by Axenolith (Progressives - the crust that surrounds the well used and uncleaned urinal of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

While Sessions does mention some names initially, his latter paragraphs utilize titles as he is sort of outlining the duties. He used the term Inspector General several times before using the words DAG.

Altogether, there was around 7 Inspector General, 3 Attorney General, 2 DAG, and Senior Federal Prosecutor. Given that the term DAG was within those paragraphs, I would not assign very much importance to the term as being indicative of any future action with respect to RR. JMHO


747 posted on 03/29/2018 7:10:59 PM PDT by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
Seems odd that he wouldn't refer to a person/position consistently throughout the document. Sheesh it is hard enough to read what they write with out changing things every other sentence. But, that's just me.
748 posted on 03/29/2018 7:14:40 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 747 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Hey, take it easy Kemosabi. My apologies if I upset you.

You feel like who is trying to damage the Q program?


749 posted on 03/29/2018 7:16:18 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 744 | View Replies]

To: Dissident1

http://digg.com/2018/palantir-cambridge-analytica

http://fortune.com/2017/03/05/peter-thiels-palantir-is-powering-trumps-immigration-agenda/

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-38315682

More on Theil/Palantir

The cabal is not fond of a renegade gay billionaire who agrees w/Trump. Palantir is possibly being used for *extreme vetting* and *predictive policing*.

Not sure how comfortable I am with the predictive crime aspect. NOT libertarian, IMO.


750 posted on 03/29/2018 7:16:50 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: generally

I have always felt the the Struck-Stroke love affair was a canard to give cover to an organized coup.


751 posted on 03/29/2018 7:17:52 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Hmm, I set up a twitter account during Trump’s campaign and I think I made 5 or 6 tweets or twits and I just couldn’t figure out the ground rules whatsoever.

So now I just read a few peoples’ twitter thingies. But I never get that message, I just read.

What happens when you click this link?

https://twitter.com/LarrySchweikart


752 posted on 03/29/2018 7:17:57 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
What I noted was specific mention of Wray as being on Sessions' senior management team. For law enforcement, Wray reports directly to Rosenstein, not Sessions.

Sessions also referred to Horowitz by name, in conjunction with this set of investigations.

The second half of p2 and first half of p3 are clinical descriptions of "the system," so use of titles there is natural.

And in closing, Sessions exhorts his recipients to contact him (Sessions) directly.

Rosenstein is not mentioned by name, at all.

753 posted on 03/29/2018 7:18:06 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 747 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i

I note that he did use the Name and title of the heads of the department-initially.

However later on, when he was writing about the duties, he used the titles. Several times used the term Inspector General, Attorney General, DAG, Senior Fed. Prosecutor.


754 posted on 03/29/2018 7:19:34 PM PDT by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 748 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

This person, at post 662 started the whole thing.


755 posted on 03/29/2018 7:19:53 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies]

To: bitt

...the ‘lovers’ cover-up ...
_______________________
Has anyone ever read one word of affection, one flirty comment or one reference to each other as a sex object in ALL the Strock/Page emails?

How do you exchange so many emails/texts and never say *honey* or *miss you* or *can’t wait to get you alone*?

They weren’t lovers. I’ll bet on it.


756 posted on 03/29/2018 7:21:34 PM PDT by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 686 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

The one that thought they had identified Q as being someone who could profit from shutting down the current monopoly/social media sites is the one that was upsetting to bagster, I think.


757 posted on 03/29/2018 7:21:44 PM PDT by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

When Gore va Bush was sent to SCOTUS my dad wrote the nomicltute of laws that it would be decided under and the names of each justice and how they would vote on a slip of paper and gave it to the county judge.
When the decision came in the Judge opened it and dad was 100% correct. Judge told dad if he was twenty years younger he’d nominate him for the federal bench. Dad told him “ If I were ten years younger I’d take it!”


758 posted on 03/29/2018 7:22:58 PM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]

To: smileyface
Evil. She’d take down a plane of innocents. What wouldn’t she do?

I'm thinking back to the bombings of Serbia. What wouldn't the Clintons do? :(

759 posted on 03/29/2018 7:23:31 PM PDT by Does so (Let's make the word Mohammedism--adding it to other ISMs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 677 | View Replies]

To: smileyface

D for Director supposedly=Comey


760 posted on 03/29/2018 7:24:10 PM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 1,881-1,885 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson