Posted on 03/09/2018 12:57:47 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3637830/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
http://qanonmap.github.io
Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3637271/posts?page=5#5
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Cboldt said:
“To be pedantic about it, you copied a plaintext URL that didn;t link to anything, and the FR converted your post of that into a clickable link.
ransmnote suggested that I obfuscate 8chan URLs using tinyurl, and I’ve done that a couple times. But when I think about it, if the point is to avoid connecting FR to 8chan, using an obfuscated URL makes me MORE guilty - sending to people to 8chan without their awareness.
I am of a mind that a plaintext URL, not being a link and requiring the reader to affirmatively put it in their browser, doesn’t run afoul of the “no links” rule. And especially so in the Q adventure, where most people participating and lurking know the source.”
_______________________________________________
To clarify, I never actually “suggested that I obfuscate 8chan URLs using tinyurl” largely because I don’t know what that means or how to do it. I think it’s likely I used a link I thought was safe and you figured out it was an obfuscated tinyurl. I will try to get clarification from Admin on what may be posted. Please private message 8chan links and if you post 8chan links in error, please ask the mods to delete your post.
I apologize for the stress around this issue. It arises from trolls complaining to admin about 8chan (troll complained that 8chan hosted kiddie porn, antisemitism). All Q Anon threads were deleted and I received an email instructing me to stop posting Q Anon threads. I agreed to cease posting Q Anon and noted, for the record, that I hadn’t been posting 8chan links. For that reason my threads reappeared and I regained permission to post Q Anon threads again.
So, I’d like to be cautious re 8chan links. I want to comply, I just am not sure what that entails.
For those wondering, I don’t believe those 8chan threads were ever hosting kiddie porn and antisemitism as that is against their board rules (guarantees thread deletion). I believe that assertion was made by trolls to keep people from accessing Q Anon threads. Early on, trolls replaced a Q post with an “updated” version into which they had inserted Swastikas in order to repel people. Sad, really, because those Q board Anons work so hard to dig up the info that goes into those Q drops, they don’t get paid or are rarely acknowledged, then sludge trolls accuse them of the SAME crimes Anons are trying to end by exposing the monsters in the government!
Sorry. Not buying that.
LOL...I’ve been doing this at our local convenient store! I haven’t had the pleasure of watching the results like you though...for fear of loitering. :) Good job!!
And without that, the shucking and jiving quibbling about this or that bit of evidence will likely be too protracted if not endless.
imho.
She's a god to too many lobotomized sheeple. The god MUST be brutally exposed, imho.
Harumph! And well you should! Gotta use my 50,000 word vocabulary for something!
Corsi from NJ says that it’s being passed around. Someone on thread had spoken to members of the NYC police department who examined the insurance file and some members did leave the room and vomit in the hall
What is being released is the mildest
If the video partially obscured there is the opportunity to deny what occurred, seeing as the media is already trying to get ahead of the video and persuade people that you won’t be able to believe what you see I think it has to leave no doubt that a crime occurred (no wiggle room, no deals). Which is why I believe it will not be pornographic and pixelated.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/04/technology/fake-videos-deepfakes.html
Here Come the Fake Videos, Too
Artificial intelligence video tools make it relatively easy to put one person’s face on another person’s body with few traces of manipulation. I tried it on myself. What could go wrong?
http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-fake-videos-20180219-story.html
Fake videos are on the rise. As they become more realistic, seeing shouldn’t always be believing
From fake news to fabricated video, can we preserve our shared reality?
SEARCH FOR SOLUTIONS The advent of inexpensive and readily accessible fabricated video production brings new meaning to the phrase ‘seeing is believing.’ Combatting falsified footage demands a shift among news outlets and news consumers, experts say.
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/374320-lawmakers-worry-about-rise-of-fake-video-technology
Lawmakers worry about rise of fake video technology
imho.
She is so loathed by so many people--including most who have worked close with her and left her stench--this one gross evil would light a fire to burn her at the stake as nothing else would, imho.
And, I think to deal with her as is needed, such a fire must be lit.
That’s clever.
Makes more sense than the receivership, I did not get that until I misunderstood Q’s response.
Part of my conclusions about Twitter and the use of the 'RECEIVERSHIP' word is that we have been expecting something along those lines ever since the December Executive Order supporting confiscation of such wealth.
We've thought it was overdue.
Freeper Thread.
The ex-Coastie I know is rock conservative. Rescue helicopter pilot. Lt Cmdr Vietnam. Absolutely wonderful man.
********************************************************
Me too. My Dad was a Coastie in WWII, spent months escorting ships without even seeing land. Took part in sinking the last german submarine of WWII off point Judith Light.
DH & I were discussing this. He has the ultra-logical lawyer gene and said nope! No way they could ever legally promulgate child abuse across public platforms, especially the EBS. Huge can of worms.
Then: if there actually was undetectable video spoofing that put anyone at all into compromising situations, wouldn’t they have already done that to POTUS?
Also, we’ve seen discussion of this video tech and there apparently is some flicker in the insertions that is evident. I’ve seen some attempts where there is an outline around inserted figures, quite evident if you look for it.
So: I conclude that any attempt to claim fraudulent video can be disproved quickly by anyone with the PhotoShop applications needed to dissect videos. Not even that expensive or technical, if I understand the process correctly.
LOVE that!
Your good.
However, that level of proof is more needful in a court-room.
Convincingly introducing the topic--even with a redacted video--should be quite sufficient to get perceptive, fair-minded people up in arms ... perhaps even with pitchforks etc.
ph
Looks like I have a lot of catching up to do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.