Posted on 03/02/2018 12:58:27 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3635959/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
We're having trouble with the websites that we normally access to check for Q drops. For now, Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
Folks, the answer is right there in the question. Snowden was the CIA's attack on the NSA. The CIA shot first at the NSA to bring it down. What organization is the ONLY one which can return fire? it's obvious that would be the NSA shooting back in kind, targeting the CIA by leaking documents about the CIA to Wikileaks as a counterpunch.
No one else was targeted by Snowden's leaks. . . and the documents in the first six vaults were ALL about the NSA and only contained NSA documents.
Vault 7 was CIA documents and very much damaged the CIA. Would Snowden, a CIA plant, damage his mother agency? No. But the NSA counter attacking could damage the CIA, showing that two can play at this game and that they have more potent, up-to-date real-time weapons, including data as dated recently as this last autumn.
The only had a 5K budget for the furniture
Who played the fiddle while Rome burned? Nero.
Who was the director of the CIA during the time that Snowden was doing his burning down the US Intelligence structure? John Owen Brennan was the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from March 2013 to January 2017. Snowden flew the coop on May 20, 2013. Prior to that, General David Petraeus was director of the CIA. . . but perhaps it was Emperor Barack Hussein Obama. . . fiddling away in the White House.
are any of these the article you noted ?
wayback
here’s cached version of a scrubbed article re: MacFadyen
newsweek states the contents of the fox article,(number of emails and attachments etc..) which I can’t seem to find.
http://www.newsweek.com/seth-rich-dnc-staffer-wikileaks-leaked-emails-fbi-610383
I do not remember if this has been posted but there are now 18,510 sealed indictments on Pacer.
Break out down for me please. How is this 26 year old tired to trump or the democrats or deep state.
Still there on https://qanonmap.github.io
Q is a group of military intel officers that works deep below the white house in the presidential emergency operations center.
Do you realize, YOU, being a former SPEC OPS, are not the target audience. This is geared towards the autistic army and for later, waking up everyday normal Americans. With 22 million plus not tuned in and growing, I believe it is working.
CGato
Impossible. May be a body double. Podesta is at gitmo.
The only people who can fire back are those who are being shot at. . . think about it.
That would mean the leakers of Vault 7 are the NSA.
Hmmmmmmmmm
I had not known that about Sandy Hook/computer shot.
Good question.
I like your analysis.
suspectable=patsy?
Wow. That simple????
Thanks!
Are you Hmong?
Read the thread if you would like to be informed. Just like everybody else. I am not your tutor.
Now that, my FRiend is an excellent question.
That is a good point that things were discovered and exposed in late 60’s early 70’s, and I guess supposedly done away with, only to find years later that they climbed into the woodwork and made lots of permutations that have been operational since they climbed into said woodwork.
What else is out there, indeed?
In other words it’s not related at all.
Glad for the update.
I knew right away that we needed to do offline archiving of the story reports of him shooting the phone. Memory Hole beckons.
Don’t you have anything better to do? Poor for-Q dear.
If this is true, and you aren't a LARP, just think how helpful you could be in deciphering the Q posts.
...string a bunch of shut-ins along...
With all due respect, you seem to post just as much as anybody else on here. Shut-in.
I agree. I'm leaving them with links in the Q Lexicon so people can make up their own minds, but I am also posting caveat warnings both about the possible name changing behavior and the subliminal porn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.