Posted on 02/21/2018 12:06:33 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner (i.e., personal attacks).
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633313/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize Q Anon information into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
That’s an illogical fallacy. It would make me happy if I was wrong about Q, and if I was wrong, it wouldn’t make me a closed minded troll.
A controlled opposition psyop is designed to immobilize us, thinking that white hats have it under control, when in fact, we should be marching in the millions to prevent this coup.
I have followed Q since week 1, and my doubts have only grown. George Soros is not in gitmo. Neither is Tony Podesta.
Contorting the posts to fit Revelation is milleniallism, which has cost Christians dearly.
Having said all that, I am more optimistic than I was at the end of the summer, but the danger is still extremely high with the dirty cop Mueller running his sham investigation.
Well...I have had little sleep the last 5 days so that’s my story and I’m stickin’ with it... LOL ...seriously tired!
Only if q is proven 100% legit.
Q is probably the Russian troll farm.
Wow that looks like he just defined a group of our old FRiends that are now actively working against us and/or trying to distract us...
Here is an hours worth of Q Proof if anybody is interested
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yc2zbMnlKA4
Thanks for insight.
Then post numbers 803 and 804 suggest some kind of network
system was turned on today for the first time.
What happened today on Twitter, Youtube and so on?
Who are being targeted?
Who are not being targeted?
When setting your size parameter, you can also set it as an absolute in number of pixels in width you want it to be, rather than a percentage of its original size. Doing pixel sizing gives you better control of the resulting size on screen.
To do that use the same command as before but omit the "%" and the NNNN would be the number of pixels wide you want the image to be on screen.
For example if you want your image to be 640 pixels wide:
<img src="URL" WIDTH="640">
Would give you that result.
Making sure you see the new drop.
See earlier posts, last night & today - I posted the DOJ task force announcement and it mentioned elections and practically anything else that might make an interesting target along with provisions for most of the DoJ entities including U.S. Marshalls; they’re supposed to report back by June. Then, yesterday, Trump signed a memo that gives full power to T-Rex + Mad dog & Coats to do whatever they need to do with full power by POTUS. re Twitter + YT - they are doing a significant purge against conservatives + libertarians.
Why has no one protested from the Podesta Team? someone muxt have a reason to talk. Just an observation.
Imagine ... you’re one of HRC + Obama cadres ... you know the fake news is fake ... when the phone rings, “Did you hear? That ‘Q’ just started the DAY OF RECKONING!”. Who you gonna call? Genius. ROFLMAO ;)
Feb 21 2018 21:47:02
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
ID: 403fc2
458430
NEW
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32403785.pdf
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/ciasuseofjournal00unit.pdf
Why are the above [public declassified docs] highly protected?
Q
Feb 21 2018 21:47:02
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
ID: 403fc2
458430
NEW
https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/docid-32403785.pdf
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/ciasuseofjournal00unit.pdf
Why are the above [public declassified docs] highly protected?
Q
Feb 21 2018 21:53:06
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
ID: 403fc2
458475
NEW
>>458430
Scroll through both docs.
Q
Dustin Nemos thinks it's about all those who covered student David Hogg and his friends and questioning if they were crisis actors or not. Hogg has been out in front on all kinds of interviews with his gun control message.
He was even filming as the shooting incident was going on and it was heavily edited and sounded more like a PSA for gun control than a shooting happening in real time. People mentioned Twitter was doing the same thing.
These good people being banned must be over the target as these crazy leftists want the gun control message to get out there, unopposed.
CGato
"I do consider it noteworthy, however, that on November 30, 1973, the Washington Star-News reported that the CIA employed some forty journalists who doubled as undercover contacts.
The back and forth series of memos from Congress to CIA claim that the list of forty CIA employed journalists was known but not released to the public at the time.
The CIA promised to cease and desist the program of running journalists.
Why are the above [public declassified docs] highly protected?
Q
Because obviously the CIA is back in the running of the media, if in fact they ever truly got out of the business.
Ha!
You're coming awful close to admitting what many have suspected.
The CIA has been running things for a while now. I thought their mission was FOREIGN intelligence. Am I mistaken?
p.s. Interesting how a 14 year old larper got his mitts on those documents, isn’t it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.