Posted on 02/16/2018 10:15:21 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Major DOJ announcement that Russians did NOT influence election, That Widespread Voter Fraud DID occur - Illegals voting, Disenfranchised stopped, Digital manipulation in many States and three Senate races impacted. Trump/Q signals demise of empty shell CIA. And Bill Cooper finally given some of his due.
https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/ http://blackboxvoting.org/ https://qcodefag.github.io/
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
agree
romney pos
Ha ha ha ha ha
Is this week... Look it up.
B-7V is a Navy battleship, but in the above context, B-7B: Volvo Series Bus Chassis. Perhaps the attack payload will be a Volvo Bus.
Not too far ahead of you...
No one understands him. You aren't supposed to. You are supposed to follow the breadcrumbs to your own education. You don't learn calculus by watching it on TV. You start by doing 2+2, then large sums then geometry then you get to integral calculus as not too mind-bending next step.
Now Lyndon Larouch put about a theory that calculus was a fraud perpetrated by the British Intelligence operative Isaac Newton. So conspiracy theorists can be totally nuts. Or was he?
It's a pretty small circle, in fact, and a lot of those things were cut off. Most access is closely watched and logged and contained within special small SAPs in the intelligence community.
A whole lot of Shiff goin on!
“statisticakky that Trumo”
Translation: “stun that beeber”
LOL ...... Stay Safe !
This guy comes across as sincere and competent.
I remember the day when I finally realized that every talking head on every station, every dem politician, etc., was using the exact same terminology simultaneously.
I hadn’t believed much in journalism for a while; but hadn’t realized that the propaganda was SO organized until that moment.
What’s also interesting is that the media has been using the method of “let them come to their own conclusion” for the past half century. The method is an extremely powerful persuasion tool.
This is, on a broad scale, the method Q uses. Q’s technique is of course different from the way the media does it, but the effect is essentially the same.
None of this points to anything about Q’s validity. It could be Q is working with Trump, and it could be Q is deep state.
My overwhelming personal preference is that Q is legitimate and working with Trump.
They focus a lot on Wisconsin in this video, and Charnin talks about the Walker election, Russ Feingold having been robbed, and says that Hillary is basically a Republican, Bernie is the "real" Democrat, etc.
Then I went over to this video in which the "Sane Progressive" interviewed Richard Charnin shortly after the general election. In this video, Richard Charnin brags that he correctly predicted the electoral vote in 2008, 2012, and 2016. Charnin is clearly a Democrat and Bernie supporter. He claims that Hillary was the "Establishment" candidate, of course. His thesis appears to be that the preferred Establishment candidate (almost) always wins, regardless of party affiliation.
In this last video I referenced, which I haven't finished yet, Charnin seems to indicate that Donald Trump was able to win despite the pro-Hillary voter fraud which occurred. He takes the publicly available pre-election polling, adjusts for the actual party affiliation as computed by Gallup (namely, 40I-32D-28R)—as opposed to when the Media was going with, which was a much heavier weight in favor of Democrats—and then he incorporates a group of estimates on how the undecided vote breaks for the challenger.
So anyway, the issue I'm having is that if it's Republicans who are usually "stealing" votes from populous Democrat cities and counties, then that would mean that the American people are even stupider than it seems—and that hardly seems possible.
Some of the content of these videos references back to the great William Cooper—who was far from perfect, but who tried to do the right thing—and the notion that 1) the US "created" Bin Laden, and, of course, 2) that, ironically, Bin Laden actually had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks. So things obviously wander far afield, depending on who the interviewer is. When the notion is presented that militant Islam somehow isn't as dangerous as we think—when we know that it's far more dangerous than anyone imagines—and everything becomes the CIA's fault, I find that just a little to tidy.
This Charnin guy seems like a dyed-in-the-wool "social" Democrat and Jill Stein/Bernie fan, so the conclusions he draws must be viewed in light of that apparent bias. Because, if the idea is that we should somehow be following the lead of Progressives—who uniformly support things like gun control and Marxism, for instance—then I question the ultimate utility or honesty of such productions.
Having said that, Charnin does seem to think that the Trump phenomenon is real—in fact, much more real than is apparent, due to the Hillary vote fraud perpetrated by the Uniparty Establishment. So there are definitely grains of truth which shine through any bias that exists...
We did get the recent indictments. But it is also worthy to note that Q never says that the public will be immediately aware of what he is laughing about. Even if it has something to do with Huma or whatever. Yet I would like to see something concrete just like everyone else. And at some point if nothing concrete pops up then the entire Q thing will fade away as a great hoax. There is a limit as to how long it can go on without seeing results. Even if there are somethings that can’t be explained by the theory that Q is just some hoaxer cyber kitty without connections.
The longer this goes on the more likely it is to be true.
It’s too easy to find or out someone on the internet.
Remember they even tracked down Petraeus girlfriend on the internet (while he was head of the CIA).
She was using good security practices but was caught by security cameras at a gas station or 7-11.
The point is, if they want to find you they do.
I keep thinking that if there is nothing to this then the White house could make a statement that it is a hoax. No doubt that they know about it one way or another after all this time. I am even more surprised that the media is not asking them about it at press conferences.
How long is long enough for you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.