Posted on 02/16/2018 7:47:47 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3631951/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
If you want to exclude critics and skeptics from your conversations, you need to start your own forum, where you make the rules.
This is Jim Robinson's house, and he's never put any such restrictions on free and open discussion here.
The money thing with the playmate story. She says she didn’t say anything before because she’d get sued for 150K by the Enquirer. I’m sure Hillary and a lot of other people would have paid her much more for her troubles if they had only known Hillary was going to lose. Plus she had to throw in that Trump made a racist comment to her about a black friend. Sounds fishy.
1. No Americans were found to be willingly cooperating with any of the indicted parties or schemes.
2. There is no finding that any of the activities had any influence on the outcome of the 2016 election.
But the media will go to town on all of the parts that mention the Trump campaign, and ignore the rest.
so what does this mean?
The story sounds fishy,but if it was true, it seems the media has been trying g to stir up marital problems between Donald and Melania for months now.
Mueller indicts 13 Russians today.Big enough??
Head-scratch.
So, were they For Him or Against Him?
Sounds like they were making money from both sides to organize rallies.
They charged that some Russians didn’t disclose who they were and approached some “unwitting” Trump campaign people. This sounds like an exoneration of the Trump campaign.
Hillary campaign, OTOH, “witting”?
The Deep State "narrative" for the day (Russia Russia Russia) doesn't make much sense. Supposedly, the Russians were paid to disparage Hillary and build up Trump.
There's SO MUCH the Russians had to work with to disparage Hillary and somehow it never made it to the public. Every day I learn more about Hillary's crimes I hadn't heard of before. A FReeper just sent me a link I'll pass along here. It's about Hillary's private server - it outlines technical details and then at the 8 minute mark explains how Hillary, as acting Sec of State, established the equivalent of an espionage center with her blackberry, secret file server and her (false) claims that she doesn't know how to use a computer.
What about all the research available to you and me right now documenting Hillary's links to child trafficking? Did that ever inspire public attention? Did the Russia disinfo focus attention on that? Haiti? Hillary's epic fraud and theft of Haitian relief money? People have been documenting that stuff for years. The Russians could have leaked Benghazi, Uranium One.....wait....wait.....Hillary benefited Russia and sabotaged US security with Uranium One. Russia would like that to keep happening. Trump won't let that happen. Russia never wanted to lose pay to play with Hillary.
During the time Russia supposedly talked up Trump, Trump was taking quite the beating. ANything and everything that could be said about him negatively was - in addition to made up stories (Dossier) and ridiculously slanted coverage (95%).
I'm curious to know what feeble "praise" the Russians supposedly disseminated re Trump. The MSM was certain Trump would lose and Hillary's supporters themselves were weeping with shock the night of the election because everything they read and saw on social media and the MSM told them she would win.
SO there's reality, and there's the latest response from the Deep State to try to overthrow our duly elected government.
bookmark
Also, Twitter happily shadow-bans criticism of Hillary or conservative opinion, so had Russian scammers posted negative things about Hillary, it would have been shadow-banned.
Totally agree, FR used to be more focused.
CIA Argues The Public Can’t See Classified Information It Has Already Given To Favored Reporters
What proofs have been provided? I’m very curious about that statement.
Anyone with access to that securedrop thing that the media apparently uses? Would be interesting to see how much they’ve strategically “leaked” to influence the public.
To a degree, Q sort of farms out research with his questions.
There are some interesting tidbits here, https://www.thecipherbrief.com/dead-drop
and here, https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-intelligence-shut-downs-damning-report-on-whistleblower-retaliation?ref=scroll by Kevin Poulsen
C.Y.A.
U.S. Intelligence Shuts Down Damning Report on Whistleblower Retaliation
A top watchdog investigated 190 cases of alleged retaliation against whistleblowers—and found that intelligence bureaucrats only once ruled in favor of the whistleblower.”
Those in charge at the alphabet agencies are none too fond of whistleblowers.
Ah but Sheppy on Fox news is setting up for his 3pm show today and already twisting the words and saying the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians.
I wish he was off Fox!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.