Posted on 02/16/2018 7:47:47 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3631951/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
Maybe.....the Keystone is the Capstone turned UPSIDE DOWN.
When the Capstone is turned upside down, it becomes a Keystone.
??
Don’t know how true that is, but what you wrote has such an exquisite beauty in a minimalistic, philosophical way. I can actually see that as the central moment in a piece of fiction where the story totally changes. Beautiful concept. Lovely flash of insight.
This has been going on my entire life. Remember when the way you got a mortgage was to go to the savings and loan in your town, the depositors in which were local citizens.
And what happened. Banking crisis after banking crisis they went belly-up and were taken over. Where did the assets go - they didn't go away, they were transferred to bigger and bigger entities, like Citibank, which itself got bailed out many times and ended up in the hands of - hold on - the Saudis??????
And who were some of the scoundrals in this crisis - oh my, the Bushes.
At the suggestion of a FReeper I respect, I will post a thought I shared with her.
The Federal Reserve controls the money and on the word of the Fed Americans suffer as does the world. Could money controlled by the Fed could be keystone?
The Federal Reserve is secretive and IMHO evil.
I think you are correct in terms of how many of us see Satanism.
Let me suggest a different way of looking at this matter.
Those who adhere to Judea/Christian culture--Westerners--believe that there is an objective right and wrong...like the Ten Commandments.
Progressives do not believe there is a right and a wrong. They believe, in effect, that reality is what you want it to be.
For example, if a person believes that evil doesn't exist (and that's what progressives and Liberals believe), life gets a lot easier.
If a person thinks being a homosexual is OK because that's how they are wired, then it is incumbent on Progressives and Liberals to accept that person for who he/she is. Same for transsexuals.
That's where the slippery slope begins.
If homosexuals are OK and transsexuals are OK (i.e. not sin), then what about pederasts or those who practice bestiality.
Anyway, you see where this is heading.
Liberals, progressives, post-modernist, communists believe that Judeo/Christian--Western--culture is intolerant and unaccepting and even hateful because it is intolerant toward their lifestyles. And from their point of view, they are correct...sort of.
There is a deity of progressivism (though many progressives may not know this).
Saul Alinsky knew this. That is why he dedicated "Rules for Radicals" to this deity.
Here's the dedication in Rules for Radicals...
"Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer."
Those who are aware of this deity of progressivism do not think he is evil. They recognize him as the deity who represents what they believe. They believe he is a guardian spirit, a god of enlightenment...the true God.
As the famous occultist Aleister Crowley said of the guiding principal of this kind of life: "Do as thou wilt."
Or in modern day terms, "if it feels good, do it."
It might be better to call Satanism, Luciferianism. It doesn't sound so bad.
It is not, at its lowest levels, occult in appearance. But at the top, it is.
Is there really such a deity?
Maybe yes, maybe no.
But many folks believe there is and that there are advantages that come with believing.
As an aside, consider that churches which are full on Sunday may contain only a few true believers. Same for the Church of Lucifer.
There are millions who have adopted the progressive culture, and many fewer who actually might call themselves Luciferians...and even fewer still who are true believers.
But they (the true believers/practicing occultist) do exist.
It is this entire culture (not just the true believers) that I think Q is referring to as Satanism.
Now all this having been said, let me add that for those of us who are true believers of the Christian faith, we also believe that there is really is a deity of all those tolerant progressives. And we believe he is indeed quite evil.
We believe this because we believe we have seen him at the periphery of spiritual experience. He is the one trying to destroy us in our battle to draw closer to the God we believe is calling us to Himself.
Whew. Finally at the end of this long-winded explanation.
Hope I haven't made matters even worse.:-)
Well said. May I add that Satan’s greatest tactic is to convince so many people he doesn’t exist.
Post #823 - agreed. Follow the money.
$
Yet another reason not to trust vaccines. Thanks for posting that.
Don’t know if this will help but Pennsylvania is known
To be the “ keystone “ state...
Here is some interesting information on how Bush became the VP choice for Reagan.
** What is that outline a shape of? **
You mean the owl outline?
Since Keystone is the one element that holds everything together, I continue to think Q is referring to whoever holds sway over the leaders of this while Cabal. SA, Roths, Soros get their orders from somewhere. If the Roths are not the keystone, then a group maybe? Bilderberg?
Who’s talking about "modern satanism" which is a plaything of ignorant children created in the 60s and 70s? This is the real thing that’s been with us under various names and religions since civilization began.
The UN has been with us only since 1949. . . and its predecessor the League of Nations was only established in 1920.
I knew one of the signatories to the UN Charter. I studied Political Science under him. And even he said the UN is impotent. . . that it’s a debating society with no teeth. .. and note is it, in my opinion, Q’s Keystone; it doesn’t meet the criteria that Q outlines.
That makes sense. I’m going to go back and reread everything with that in mind.
Thanks. I’m going to try to do some research today.
Back In 1970, former National Security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in Between Two Ages, that:
‘By the year 2018, technology will make available to the leaders of the major nations, a variety of techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised. One nation may attack a competitor covertly by bacteriological means, thoroughly weakening the population (though with a minimum of fatalities) before taking over with its own armed forces. Alternatively, techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm…”
In this same book we also find this quote:
“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”
What if keystone is not literal, but a place or a logo or a company?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.