Posted on 02/12/2018 3:56:31 AM PST by ransomnote
Edited on 02/13/2018 7:01:59 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to share information and opinions about Q Anon content. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3630912/posts?q=1&;page=1>
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
You can locate my prior Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference:
A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
Please private message me to report trolls. The Admins have limited time to deal with requests regarding trolls and I'm hoping to reduce abuse reports from this thread from multiple persons into one set of requests.
If you are new to Q Anon trolls, you may find the following thread useful.
Q Anon: Increasing levels of disinformation and trolling
No doubt. Truman, for example, wrote an editorial regarding the CIA in December that same year. Clearly he knew that CIA was not acting as it should.
It’s taken a looooong time, but maybe justice will be done, or at least all the truth exposed.
Her philosophy, Objectivism , advocates reason, individualism, and personal happiness. Conservatives are more likely to favor faith, tradition, and duty as core values. Politically, Objectivism is classically liberal or libertarian . It expresses a world view associated with the Enlightenment.
Despite your differences in basic philosophy, you must agree with her theories on capitalism as it relates to self interest or "greed" as the lefties would have it.
Rand was a brilliant mind, there can be no doubt. And her books tended to be a hard slog, with much repetition. This is true. Brilliant minds tend to ramble at times. But she had much to say that was worthy, and you can't dismiss it just because you have some quibbles.
Don Lemon, John Oliver, Colbert, Jon Stewart
Found these lists:
https://www.quora.com/Who-are-the-prominent-left-wing-commentators-that-attract-controversy-in-the-USA
Overman, Maher, Maddow,Krugman, Chris Matthews
Also: from a Speaker Bureau website:
http://www.eaglestalent.com/speakers/politics-amp-current-affairs/commentators-pundits/
Also: from a Speaker Bureau website:
http://www.washingtonspeakers.com/topics/political-pairings.cfm?showall=y
FWIW from 2007 - contact info to media personnel (historical document)
https://www.labnol.org/internet/email/email-address-of-journalists-news-editors-tv-anchors-web-reporters/1352/
NBC:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NBC_personalities
ABC:
http://www.gogomag.com/talkingheads/misc_abc_f.php
and
https://www.pinterest.com/abcnews/abc-news-anchors/
CNN:
https://www.cnn.com/specials/tv/anchors-and-reporters
CBS:
https://www.cbsnews.com/team/
It just might, and I'm willing to chance being called a fool for that chance.
And that's why I'll always be a Bagster fan.
Back last year, in a Q & A, QAnon said that Israel was behind 911.
Now, what that person the real QAnon answering the questions? I don't know.
I guess I'm just here: I don't know if Q is a real person who knows something, or if Q is pulling a big Larp.
Either way it's interesting.
But for me personally, it's not life or death I guess you could say.
Possibly, but transplantation harvest would have to take place before death. Bone Marrow, however can be harvested after death, and yields the most $$ at sale.
More likely to be happening in battle field and natural disasters, I would think.
I don’t have a source link, but I read recently somewhere (so can’t vouch for veracity) that many of the current vaccines actually have fetal tissue in their mix.
Wouldn’t surprise me but heartily pray it isn’t true.
Feb 12 2018 15:15:20
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 4bcc84
354139
Our attack on big pharma came w/ a warning letter today.
Message received.
Response forthcoming.
Q
is what I get from HERE
I definitely think it’s something that’s interesting.
Brings new meaning to the eternal flame on his grave.
Wow, that’s pretty cool beans, mairdie. For real.
Totally off topic - but had to respond to the herbalist subject - I will definitely try natural remedies for minor things first, like, for instance, Vit. C or usnea for upper respiratory or cold issues.
(Like you, I don’t hate modern medicine.)
My first thought on looking at the fuzzy Clinton and Asian photo with the water deluge behind them was that the Clinton’s were puppeteers behind NK, not just the Chinese.
Podesta has the hand of a black man.
Either Podestas' head was photoshopped on the body or someone photoshopped the hand of a black man on Podesta.
I checked 5 different pictures and it's the hand of a black man.
Download it and lighten the photo.
Somewhere along the line the photo was photoshopped.
Hell just look at the other guy replying to me. He was here in 1998 and switched accounts too.
Many here have switched names.
OK, I will but it's tough for me sometimes. It reminds me of engaging the Freepers who were so anti-Trump during the election. Some meant well and others it was on purpose. The ones that meant well did come around to President Trump once all the lies and deceptions about him were put to rest.
I do figure some mean well on here as well but they are missing out on the big picture. You disregard all of Q's info and we're still left with a lot of red-pilling going on with the American people. You see fellow Freepers report it here, and see it on Twitter, Youtube, Facebook, etc.
Whether it was a ruse or for real, the unintended or intended consequence is Americans are waking up and that's a good thing whether these disruptors want to a accept that or not. I do believe those, like during the election, will come around and understand the bigger picture eventually.
CGato
You got a ink to that source we can all try to figure out what's up...
Photoshop was my very first impression of this photo. Even the stormy backdrop looks fake. IMO
Good stuff is going on in these threads. Not all of it is one hundred percent legit. I understand that. But I believe the majority of it is factual. I won't believe just any old thing. I'm not stupid or gullible. I've had a long life of listening to my government lie to me and think that by now I can know truth when I see it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.