Crazy/Hot Matrix

1 posted on 12/30/2017 6:21:13 AM PST by Hammerhead

2 posted on 12/30/2017 6:26:45 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")

3 posted on 12/30/2017 6:30:40 AM PST by Rocky (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell)

4 posted on 12/30/2017 6:41:20 AM PST by VRW Conspirator (Enforce the Law. Build the Wall. Deport them All.)

Oh I can’t wait to show this to my buddy. He just got rid of crazy after she smashed an antique clock, his arm with a wine bottle etc.

5 posted on 12/30/2017 7:14:27 AM PST by Pollard (TRUMP 2020)

Similar to the way liberals categorize human beings.

6 posted on 12/30/2017 7:25:58 AM PST by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)

Handy pocket guide but watching the video will explain all the intricacies.

7 posted on 12/30/2017 7:45:07 AM PST by Delta 21 (Build The Wall !! Jail The Cankle !!)

Been a few years since I first saw that but damn, it’s just as funny (and accurate) the 2nd time!

8 posted on 12/30/2017 8:02:28 AM PST by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)

To: Delta 21; All; goldbux

That’s a graph not a matrix, but OK.

9 posted on 12/30/2017 12:31:33 PM PST by goldbux (No sufficiently rich interpreted language can represent its own semantics. Â— Alfred Tarski, 1936)

10 posted on 12/30/2017 11:48:05 PM PST by Hammerhead

To: Delta 21; Lazamataz; Larry Lucido; All; goldbux

It's a graph not a matrix. But the graph is inverted. It displays a linear function: gal_mad = gal_hot + 4. My extensive statistical experience demonstrates [with real demons] that ugly women are much crazier & angrier than attractive ones. If the relationship were linear, it would be more like:

for 0 < x < N, gal_mad = N - (gal_hot + 4) = N - gal_hot - 4.

But it's not linear. It's closer to: gal_mad = N - gal_hot^2.

"Mad" means mental illness not anger.

Crazy is a function of more than one independent variable, hot. It's also a function of intelligence. Dumb broads are loonier than gorgeous babes, although there are plenty of examples of over-indoctrinated women – like leftists – being nuttier than normal gals. So gal_mad [along the z axis] is at least = f(hot, smart). Plotting this along the x,y,z axes could generate a 3-D printed psychological profile – a madfie / hotfie / smartfie – which could be worn as a fetching pendant on a necklace, or presented to yer fiancé as a stunning enragement ring. Another excellent business opportunity. Visit us as madhotsmart.com.

11 posted on 12/31/2017 8:48:36 AM PST by goldbux (No sufficiently rich interpreted language can represent its own semantics. Â— Alfred Tarski, 1936)

Psychofemiology is an inexact and complicated science.

12 posted on 12/31/2017 8:54:49 AM PST by Gideon7

Admittedly, starting of with the original Hot/Crazy "Graph" is definatly Step 1 in finding the hottest/crazies chick you can hookup with and possibly bring home to Mom with.

Advancing at your own pace, then implementing the key point you are bringing up should increase the efficiency of this process by several orders of magnitude.

Dont for about me when you guys go public!

MadHotSmart.com

13 posted on 12/31/2017 9:04:04 AM PST by Delta 21 (Build The Wall !! Jail The Cankle !!)

14 posted on 12/31/2017 9:07:27 AM PST by Delta 21 (Build The Wall !! Jail The Cankle !!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794