[Delta 21]

Handy pocket guide but watching the video will explain all the intricacies.

[goldbux]

That’s a graph not a matrix, but OK.

[Hammerhead]

Excellent.

[goldbux]

It's a graph not a matrix. But the graph is inverted. It displays a linear function: gal_mad = gal_hot + 4. My extensive statistical experience demonstrates [with real demons] that ugly women are much crazier & angrier than attractive ones. If the relationship were linear, it would be more like:

for 0 < x < N, gal_mad = N - (gal_hot + 4) = N - gal_hot - 4.

But it's not linear. It's closer to: gal_mad = N - gal_hot^2.

"Mad" means mental illness not anger.

Crazy is a function of more than one independent variable, hot. It's also a function of intelligence. Dumb broads are loonier than gorgeous babes, although there are plenty of examples of over-indoctrinated women – like leftists – being nuttier than normal gals. So gal_mad [along the z axis] is at least = f(hot, smart). Plotting this along the x,y,z axes could generate a 3-D printed psychological profile – a madfie / hotfie / smartfie – which could be worn as a fetching pendant on a necklace, or presented to yer fiancé as a stunning enragement ring. Another excellent business opportunity. Visit us as madhotsmart.com.