[goldbux]

It's a graph not a matrix. But the graph is inverted. It displays a linear function: gal_mad = gal_hot + 4. My extensive statistical experience demonstrates [with real demons] that ugly women are much crazier & angrier than attractive ones. If the relationship were linear, it would be more like:

for 0 < x < N, gal_mad = N - (gal_hot + 4) = N - gal_hot - 4.

But it's not linear. It's closer to: gal_mad = N - gal_hot^2.

"Mad" means mental illness not anger.

Crazy is a function of more than one independent variable, hot. It's also a function of intelligence. Dumb broads are loonier than gorgeous babes, although there are plenty of examples of over-indoctrinated women – like leftists – being nuttier than normal gals. So gal_mad [along the z axis] is at least = f(hot, smart). Plotting this along the x,y,z axes could generate a 3-D printed psychological profile – a madfie / hotfie / smartfie – which could be worn as a fetching pendant on a necklace, or presented to yer fiancé as a stunning enragement ring. Another excellent business opportunity. Visit us as madhotsmart.com.

[Gideon7]

Psychofemiology is an inexact and complicated science.

[Delta 21]

Admittedly, starting of with the original Hot/Crazy "Graph" is definatly Step 1 in finding the hottest/crazies chick you can hookup with and possibly bring home to Mom with.

Advancing at your own pace, then implementing the key point you are bringing up should increase the efficiency of this process by several orders of magnitude.

Dont for about me when you guys go public!

MadHotSmart.com