Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth and Venus are the Same Size, so Why Doesn’t Venus Have a Magnetosphere?....
universetoday.com ^ | universetoday.com | Matt Williams

Posted on 12/12/2017 10:53:55 AM PST by BenLurkin

According to a new study conducted by an international team of scientists, it may have something to do with a massive impact that occurred in the past. Since Venus appears to have never suffered such an impact, its never developed the dynamo needed to generate a magnetic field.

...

According to the most widely-accepted models of planet formation, terrestrial planets are not formed in a single stage, but from a series of accretion events characterized by collisions with planetesimals and planetary embryos – most of which have cores of their own.

Recent studies on high-pressure mineral physics and on orbital dynamics have also indicated that planetary cores develop a stratified structure as they accrete. The reason for this has to do with how a higher abundance of light elements are incorporated in with liquid metal during the process, which would then sink to form the core of the planet as temperatures and pressure increased.

Such a stratified core would be incapable of convection, which is believed to be what allows for Earth’s magnetic field. What’s more, such models are incompatible with seismological studies that indicate that Earth’s core consists mostly of iron and nickel, while approximately 10% of its weight is made up of light elements – such as silicon, oxygen, sulfur, and others. It’s outer core is similarly homogeneous, and composed of much the same elements.

To add to this state of confusion, paleomagnetic studies have been conducted that indicate that Earth’s magnetic field has existed for at least 4.2 billion years (roughly 340 million years after it formed). As such, the question naturally arises as to what could account for the current state of convection and how it came about.

(Excerpt) Read more at universetoday.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; jupiter; lunarcapture; lunarorigin; magnetosphere; moon; paulmccartney; rogueplanet; velikovsky; venus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: BenLurkin

Bookmark


21 posted on 12/12/2017 11:12:13 AM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
What’s up with that???

The scientific term for it is B$

22 posted on 12/12/2017 11:12:42 AM PST by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

can I still insert a Uranus joke?


23 posted on 12/12/2017 11:14:36 AM PST by beergarden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The core materials are different between the two.


24 posted on 12/12/2017 11:18:34 AM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conan the Librarian

You’re right about that.

https://io9.gizmodo.com/heres-carl-sagans-original-essay-on-the-dangers-of-cl-1481304135


25 posted on 12/12/2017 11:19:17 AM PST by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Stupid question. Assumes that planets of similar size must have the same attribute regarding the magnetic field.
The real question is why do scientists think they have an explanation for everything?


26 posted on 12/12/2017 11:19:57 AM PST by I want the USA back (Liberalism is just another form of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beergarden

Uranus is right next to the Big Dipper?


27 posted on 12/12/2017 11:22:11 AM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

i’ve heard that since high school cmon now XD


28 posted on 12/12/2017 11:26:00 AM PST by beergarden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Earth has a magnetosphere because, long before the dinosaurs roamed the earth there were Monstermagnets. They died off and became the magnetosphere just like dinosaurs died off and became fossil fuels.

-PJ

29 posted on 12/12/2017 11:27:20 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
To add to this state of confusion...

Queue The Temptations...

Ball of confusion, ball of confusion...

30 posted on 12/12/2017 11:30:17 AM PST by fatez (Ya, well, you know, that's just your opinion man...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Gawd, this is too easy.

I’ll wait for other posters...


31 posted on 12/12/2017 11:30:21 AM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

That movie was a staple Saturday afternoon creature feature on one of the local Cleveland stations. It should be included in any top (or bottom?) ten list of really bad 1950’s science fiction films.


32 posted on 12/12/2017 11:31:48 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MMaschin
That is why I find it ridiculous that people keep calling exoplanets, 'Earth-like', because they are not.

Exactly. Venus is the most "Earth-like" planet ever found. It is almost the same size and mass and has relatively close to the same orbit around the same star. From a few light years away you would think that Earth and Venus are identical.

33 posted on 12/12/2017 11:33:35 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Lack of a magnetosphere was one of Velikovsky’s predictions in the 1950s, among many other correct predictions about the physical nature of Venus. It had absolutely nothing to do with some ‘collision’, but rather the origin of the planet.


34 posted on 12/12/2017 11:35:13 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Worlds in Collision (Immanuel Velikovsky, 1950) gives an interesting theory on the origin and history of Venus. It relates to historical events on Earth 3500+/- years ago as well.


35 posted on 12/12/2017 11:35:15 AM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Yet Venus, being closer to the sun, has a more intense solar wind flux, no protective magnetosphere, and a very thick atmosphere.

What’s up with that???

Heavier gases vs. Earth's lighter ones, and a time frame much shorter than our own (part of Velikovsky's theory).

36 posted on 12/12/2017 11:38:27 AM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MMaschin

What you wrote makes it even more miraculous that we are even hear and even more ridiculous that humans spend as much time doing what we do day in and day out. The chances of us even being here is infinitesimal, and we sit here and argue about nonsense.


37 posted on 12/12/2017 11:39:52 AM PST by thefactor (yes, as a matter of fact, i DID only read the excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Venus

Earth

No comparison.

38 posted on 12/12/2017 11:40:41 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MMaschin

In order for a planet to be truly ‘Earth-like’, it MUST have what the Earth received in the massive collision that created the Moon. And if you calculate the odds of that, it makes the Earth a MUCH rarer commodity.


Yep. Just check out the estimated 100,000,000,000,000,000 stars so far discovered in the universe and you will see that there cannot be any other planet anywhere like Earth because there just aren’t enough stars in the universe ... /s

Of course, the Earth-Moon collision, as well a the origin of Earth’s core, are all theories and you know what happens to theories in time, right?


39 posted on 12/12/2017 11:41:19 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
a series of accretion events

So that means the earth was only 5000 miles in diameter once. I'd like someone to tell me what the composition of the layers was then. Were the supposed plates moving then too.

ML/NJ

40 posted on 12/12/2017 11:42:04 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson