Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate building obstruction case against Trump: Feinstein
NY Post ^ | December 3, 2017 | Mark Moore

Posted on 12/03/2017 7:16:43 PM PST by EinNYC

Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein said on Sunday that the numerous investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 election are beginning to build an obstruction of justice case against President Trump.

“The [Senate] Judiciary Committee has an investigation going as well and it involves obstruction of justice and I think what we’re beginning to see is the putting together of a case of obstruction of justice,” Feinstein, the panel’s top Democrat, ‹told NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 2018elections; california; diannefeinstein; difi; fakenews; fbi; jamescomey; lawfare; peterstrzok; robertmueller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Fungi

This is what I thought, until I looked at the members. Jeff Flake and Lindsey Graham are both on that committee. Trump may pay a price for all his insults, and these two might support the Dems here.

Can they bring criminal charges? I think not, so they aren’t confined to the law.

Legally there is no case - Trump fired Comey based upon the recommendation from DOJ. There was ample good cause for the decision.

A finding from the committee might serve as a basis for impeachment.

This might be a very big deal.


41 posted on 12/03/2017 9:34:28 PM PST by theoilpainter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

Stuff it, Mrs. Blum.


42 posted on 12/03/2017 9:44:05 PM PST by beethovenfan (I always try to maximize my carbon footprint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Cooledge

Presently, I would suggest that the general public (no matter what political slant they claim) are skeptical of DC political folks. This skeptical nature goes across to the news media, state politics, etc.

If someone wanted the total destruction of both political parties...go build some fake obstruction case.


43 posted on 12/03/2017 9:46:25 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

Trump’s firing of Comey did not obstruct justice because the investigation was left intact and ongoing.


44 posted on 12/03/2017 10:11:45 PM PST by vigilence (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theoilpainter
Dream on, troll.

Impeachments begin in the House.

45 posted on 12/03/2017 10:14:17 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
Have you noticed that Diane and other femlibs villains keep their distance from President Trump? He has a Image and video hosting by TinyPic super power. All he has to do is get within a few feet of any woman, say "Booya" and they climax.
46 posted on 12/03/2017 10:14:59 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all white armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

lolol


47 posted on 12/03/2017 10:27:25 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America...Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

I’m still laughing at that...you one funny guy, tumlindice ;)


48 posted on 12/04/2017 12:58:15 AM PST by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America...Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil; EinNYC
Dianne Feinstein voted "Nay" on obstruction of justice charges against Bill Clinton back during his impeachment.

____

... flying into the rescue of the left.

49 posted on 12/04/2017 1:41:46 AM PST by a little elbow grease (I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: a little elbow grease

I’m Dianne, fly me!


50 posted on 12/04/2017 5:06:29 AM PST by Phil DiBasquette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

And a Senate finding would constitute the basis.


51 posted on 12/04/2017 7:22:36 AM PST by theoilpainter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

ditto


52 posted on 12/04/2017 9:42:07 AM PST by morphing libertarian (Build Kate's Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Phil DiBasquette
Rumor was back then ....when she was doing some of that stewardessing........ she was CIA.

She may still be doing the job.

53 posted on 12/04/2017 9:47:50 AM PST by a little elbow grease (I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson