Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The $999 iPhone X costs Apple just $357.50 to make, experts reveal
dailymail.co.uk ^ | 6 November 2017

Posted on 11/06/2017 6:18:27 PM PST by dennisw

Makes the company more money per phone than its iPhone 8 model The iPhone 8 sells for $699 and has a gross margin of 59 percent

Apple new flagship iPhone X makes the company more money per phone than its iPhone 8 model, according to an analysis, which found the iPhone X's flashier parts cost Apple 25 percent more than the iPhone 8, but that it retailed 43 percent higher.

The iPhone X smartphone costs $357.50 to make and sells for $999, giving it a gross margin of 64 percent, according to TechInsights, a firm that tears down technology devices and analyzes the parts inside.

The iPhone 8 sells for $699 and has a gross margin of 59 percent.

The finding is surprising because technology products tend to become more profitable as they age and the parts for them drop in cost.

The iPhone X is a brand new design that went on sale on Friday, to apparently strong demand, while the iPhone 8 is an update on last year's iPhone 7, which itself was similar to the iPhone 6 released in 2014.

Apple declined to comment on TechInsights' analysis.

Apple is unique in the electronics industry for its ability to charge a premium price for its latest devices and for its ability to maintain that price even when selling devices through third parties like telecom carriers, said Al Cowsky, the costing analyst for TechInsights, which planned to post the results to its site late on Monday.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 11/06/2017 6:18:27 PM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw

DETAILS WITHIN - This goes against what I have been reading here. That the margin on iPhone X was smaller than on 8.


2 posted on 11/06/2017 6:20:12 PM PST by dennisw (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it is enemy action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

MOST lower end manufactured goods have a retail price of roughly 4x what they cost to manufacture. At the higher end, the margins get much tighter.


3 posted on 11/06/2017 6:25:10 PM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

There is nothing wrong with that, as long as it performs as promised and people are buying it voluntarily.


4 posted on 11/06/2017 6:25:23 PM PST by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I paid $250 for my Samsung Galaxy.It's not the newest model but it does far,far more than I need it to do.

One thousand? Nope,not even if I was a billionaire.

5 posted on 11/06/2017 6:25:49 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (ObamaCare Works For Those Who Don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Does not seem complicated - if it’s worth $999 to someone, buy one; if it’s not, don’t. If somebody else can make and sell one at a price closer to three-to-four hundred bucks, buy theirs.


6 posted on 11/06/2017 6:25:57 PM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Add seventeen percent and that is what the real price should be.


7 posted on 11/06/2017 6:26:48 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

A 59% margin is not too much. It used to be wholesalers gave retailers a 100% markup margin so they would carry their products.

This whole Chinese race to the bottom price war has retailers often with nothing but a 2%, that’s right, 2%, margin.

Firearms often have $10 or $20 markups on $700 Firearms.

Booze has nearly nothing of a markup. A case of beer can be just 10 cents!

If Apple, or any other company, can get 59%, more power to them. No one gets ahead on 2% markups.


8 posted on 11/06/2017 6:26:54 PM PST by CodeToad (CWII is coming. Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

I do not own an Apple product. I hate Cook, but good for them. Apple is forcing no one to buy its product. Good for Apple—that is what is called freedom and free enterprise.


9 posted on 11/06/2017 6:28:15 PM PST by Fungi (What the hell is a fungus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

How do they calculate the price to manufacture? Do they allocate all the research, development, and corporate overhead to each iPhone? If you don’t charge your overhead back to your actual products that produce revenue, your accounting is not really accurate.


10 posted on 11/06/2017 6:30:55 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I paid $39.95 for my ZTE Maven smart phone. I bought it from Dollar General. It does everything I NEED. I can do internet, video’s, use any Android based App, text, voice, photo’s, play games, etc.


11 posted on 11/06/2017 6:32:12 PM PST by entropy12 (LEGAL immigrants are sponsored by a relative. Almost all are low skill & low wealth. So stupid!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Like those little Bose Cube speakers.


12 posted on 11/06/2017 6:32:39 PM PST by brianr10 (Beach Boys forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

“One thousand? Nope,not even if I was a billionaire.”

But in 6 months you have the privilege of shelling out $1500 foe the new I-toy 11 for $1500 and you can use the 10 for your latest I-toy doorstop! Whatta deal!!


13 posted on 11/06/2017 6:34:26 PM PST by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

“Add seventeen percent and that is what the real price should be.”
*****************************************************
You should go into the smartphone business. At that level of markup you won’t be able to keep up with demand. Assuming, of course, that you make a desirable product of quality.


14 posted on 11/06/2017 6:34:42 PM PST by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Ping.


15 posted on 11/06/2017 6:38:05 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Presses can be 'associated,' or presses can be independent. Demand independent presses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I agree the mark up is large, but the price to produce the phones does not include the R & D into the development.
16 posted on 11/06/2017 6:38:21 PM PST by kyneocon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

Your answer is no but the whole idea is to make a lot of money via sales and larger margins so that investments in research plus overhead can be recouped. Then you make profits, after taxes.


17 posted on 11/06/2017 6:39:00 PM PST by dennisw (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it is enemy action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Taking a business course that’s the expected yield after cost of doing business.


18 posted on 11/06/2017 6:39:03 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

That cost does not include the programming and testing that went into new features like the facial recognition, or the development of some of the new hardware features. If the device is a hit, Apple will make oodles of money, but they are not netting 65% on each sale.


19 posted on 11/06/2017 6:39:56 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kyneocon

That is not the way accounting works. Notice that word used in this article is margins, not profits.


20 posted on 11/06/2017 6:40:31 PM PST by dennisw (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it is enemy action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson