Skip to comments.
Kate Hudson Gets Blasted For Calling C-Sections 'Lazy"
New York Post ^
| 9/12/17
| Francesca Bacardi
Posted on 09/12/2017 1:10:20 PM PDT by sparklite2
Kate Hudson is feeling the wrath of mothers after implying that getting a cesarean section is taking the easy route when it comes to childbirth.
The 38-year-old mother of two appears on Cosmopolitans October cover and found herself facing controversy when she answered Have a C-Section! when asked to name the laziest thing shes ever done. Hudson gave birth to now-13-year-old son Ryder via c-section.
(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...
TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: sparklite2
John Edwards will love her.
To: sparklite2
Perhaps this showbiz nobody should attend medical school before making such comments.C-Sections are absolutely essential in some situations in order to ensure the well being of mother and/or child.
To: sparklite2
The election of Trump compelled her to say that. /s
4
posted on
09/12/2017 1:16:27 PM PDT
by
CatOwner
To: Gay State Conservative
Tell me about it. When my wife’s water broke my daughter’s umbilical cord came out first. It took 28 minutes from the time her water broke until the time she was born. I live in a rural community 15 miles from the hospital and no ambulance service.
5
posted on
09/12/2017 1:21:06 PM PDT
by
shotgun
To: sparklite2
Daughter, a Granddaughter and Great Grandson would not be here if not for C Sections, not a cake walk especially in 71, no Bikini slices then.
To: sparklite2
"
Hudson gave birth to now-13-year-old son Ryder via c-section."
I think she is entitled to joke about it if she wants to. It is not as if she had not had a c-section and was criticizing mothers who did.
7
posted on
09/12/2017 1:25:26 PM PDT
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation has ended!)
To: Bubba_Leroy
Exactly. People can’t take ANY type of joke any more.
To: sparklite2
When I was in recovery, I was told my son would have died and I might not have made it either, if I hadn’t been in the hospital and had an emergency c-section. I had been in labor for 40 hours and there was absolutely no progress and they were going about to give me pitocin when his heart slowed and came close to stopping. He was trussed in his umbilical cord, 3 times around his neck and 3 times around his body. DO NOT EVER PRETEND THAT C-SECTIONS AREN’T NECESSARY! And trust me, I do not feel less of a mother because he was born through surgery. Period.
9
posted on
09/12/2017 1:37:37 PM PDT
by
originalbuckeye
('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell)
To: sparklite2
I see many people posting about how necessary C-Sections are, and I agree that they can often be necessary for the health and well being of the mother and baby.
That said, I also suspect that she is correct, and than more than a few are done as a convenience and not out of medical necessity, and it seems hers was.
10
posted on
09/12/2017 1:41:35 PM PDT
by
BlueMondaySkipper
(Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
To: sparklite2
She would not still have a modeling career if she had not.
To: Gay State Conservative
“Perhaps this showbiz nobody should attend medical school before making such comments.C-Sections are absolutely essential in some situations in order to ensure the well being of mother and/or child.”
Yes, but that is not what she is referring to.
This is quite an honest comment on her part.
12
posted on
09/12/2017 1:58:36 PM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: Bubba_Leroy
“I think she is entitled to joke about it if she wants to. It is not as if she had not had a c-section and was criticizing mothers who did. “
Exactly. At first I thought she was criticizing women who had had C-sections after herself giving birth. That was what the headline implied.
Very different when she is referring to herself for having one.
13
posted on
09/12/2017 2:01:14 PM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: sparklite2
To: Gay State Conservative
But more and more they are not done for medical necessity but for either the mother or doctor’s convenience.
15
posted on
09/12/2017 2:20:37 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: Bubba_Leroy
I think she is entitled to joke about it if she wants to. It is not as if she had not had a c-section and was criticizing mothers who did. You're in violation of Internet Code of Regulations Title 17, Part 3, Section C, Paragraph 4, "Thou shalt not consider the context of a statement made by someone you don't like."
16
posted on
09/12/2017 2:32:08 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
( "If fascism ever comes to America, it will be called liberalism." --Ronald Reagan)
To: sparklite2
So why all the upset? That’s her opinion. So what? What’s with all the eternal outrage? It’s not like her opinion changes anything. Do people think she’s going to interfere in deliveries or argue in the OR with Obstetricians or something. Jeez. Find a real issue to stress over.
17
posted on
09/12/2017 2:36:18 PM PDT
by
Seruzawa
(TANSTAAFL!)
To: sparklite2
Blast you FReepers! Where are the pics?
To: Gay State Conservative
C-sections are promoted by obstetric docs generally for the convenience of the doctor. The number of c-sections that are medically indicated compared to the number that ate actually performed, motly for the convenience of the doctor but now more and more also for the convenience of the mother is very large. C-section in many hospitals is the normal method of birth. My daughter and her husband went to Peru to have my grandson mostly because it was cheaper than staying in the USA but partly because at 6 weeks she was already getting pressured to schedule a c-section. in Peru they went with a mid-wife and I have one exceedingly healthy grandson.
19
posted on
09/12/2017 3:00:15 PM PDT
by
arthurus
To: sparklite2
In some situations, they are needed.
In many more, she's probably right. I have always thought it myself.
20
posted on
09/12/2017 3:03:48 PM PDT
by
riri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson