"https://www.youtube.com/embed/f1YEcvEO2Bc"
"...Bye Brother Munson, Bye [Megyn]!"
Posted on 01/09/2017 10:32:36 AM PST by C19fan
Megyn Kelly let loose on Sunday night in Hollywood, as she and her husband Douglas Brunt headed to an exclusive post-Golden Globes bash hosted by CAA at the Sunset Tower Hotel. The couple was all smiles as they were pictured heading into the party and waving to the crowds outside, with Doug looking particularly fit and formal in a black pinstripe suit which he wore with a white oxford and paisley.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
She looks like Diane Sawyer’s less attractive sister in that photo.
Cleavage? What cleavage? I have more cleavage and I’m 5’10” and weigh 150 lbs soaking wet.
Rigoddamndiculous!
“Megyn Kelly would look much better on the radio......”
Very true - I got a good chuckle out of that one.
Outstanding!
Now that is the righteous purpose of plastic surgery IMO. In instances such as that, it can really help a person.
One thing I can understand is a person who is already attractive having so much done to their face that they become virtually unrecognizable.
Melanie Griffith, for instance. She used to be so pretty, and now is just a train wreck.
With a 7 month vaca, no one will remember her. In fact she’s starting to look old. Those front-on pics look crappy.
GUILTY!
headline hype.
there’s no there there.
Melanie, Jenny, Kelly, the gal from the original “Terminator” movie, Joan Rivers and so many more.
Even men that get older lose parts in Hollywood. But they seem to get plastic surgery at a much lower percentage.
Crazy.
And thank you. She was afraid so I had to be a little firm with her and maybe a little too blunt about the realities of looks in the business world and she was only 31.
I regret some of what I said, but she is VERY happy with the outcome for 17 years now. What a difference.
They also rebuilt her sinuses which likely prevented future lung diseases.
Yikes! I hope she didn’t have to pay for the dress, it does nothing for her, she looks a lot fatter torso and flat chested than on tv.
She’s not an ugly woman physically... not my cup of tea.. but certainly wouldn’t throw her out of bed either.
However, anyone can take a less than flattering photo, and I do mean ANYONE... then there are other people who are very photogenic but don’t live up to the camera in real life.
For her age, one would have to be blind to say that this woman is inherently physically unattractive... I find it disappointing whenever I see threads like this where folks decide to attack, someone that they don’t agree with politically or intellectually and just go after their physical appearance. Its just pointless.
“And to make matters worse, she is aging very poorly; she’s 47 years old and looks like her next birthday will be her 65th.”
My thoughts as well. Her age is starting to show in those pictures. With all the make up on her television show they manage to hide the aging pretty well.
Well said!
Megyn who?
“All right, Mr. DeMille, I’m ready for my close-up.”
More like “monster shot,” if you get my drift.
Actually, I’ve always thought Megyn Kelly was attractive if you could survive the underlying ball-busting personality.
She looks like Marilyn Monroe in that autopsy pic.
It’s a shame she didn’t have time to wash her hair.
That’s cleavage?
She’s trying too hard by showing too much. The shoes are hideous.
She looks horrible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.