Posted on 09/27/2016 5:33:31 AM PDT by wastedyears
Anybody notice how she would pause in her sentences as if she was listening to information? They weren't the pauses as if she was collecting her thoughts. I think she had another receiver in her ear.
Here are two examples from last night:
Clinton said:
But, remember, Donald started his career back in 1973 being sued by the Justice Department for racial discrimination because he would not rent apartments in one of his developments to African-Americans, and he made sure that the people who worked for him understood that was the policy. He actually was sued twice by the Justice Department.So he has a long record of engaging in racist behavior.
Trump responds:
Now, as far as the lawsuit, yes, when I was very young, I went into my father's company, had a real estate company in Brooklyn and Queens, and we, along with many, many other companies throughout the country -- it was a federal lawsuit -- were sued. We settled the suit with zero -- with no admission of guilt. It was very easy to do.
Clinton takes what looks like a wide-net federal lawsuit (not singling out only Trump) and uses it to claim a "long record of engaging in racist behavior."
This should be fact-checked. Who else was included in the lawsuit? What triggered it? What was the final disposition?
Example 2:
Clinton said:
We've looked at your tax proposals. I don't see changes in the corporate tax rates or the kinds of proposals you're referring to that would cause the repatriation, bringing back of money that's stranded overseas. I happen to support that.I happen to support that in a way that will actually work to our benefit. But when I look at what you have proposed, you have what is called now the Trump loophole, because it would so advantage you and the business you do. You've proposed an approach that has a...
Trump responds:
Who gave it that name? The first I've -- who gave it that name? How much? How much for my family? Lester, how much?
Clinton cross-talking:
...$4 billion tax benefit for your family... as I said, trumped-up trickle-down.
Here, Clinton makes up the phrase "Trump loophole" and claims it to be a common nickname like HillaryCare or ObamaCare, suggesting it was so-named because Trump lobbied for the tax break.
This can be fact-checked. Who named it? Who else uses it? Why was it so named?
In future debates, Trump should be on the lookout for these tricks, and instead of getting dragged down rabbit holes of minutiae defending himself, he should just shrug it off with a "there she goes again, exaggerating the facts..."
-PJ
I did wonder why he would put his arm around her, thinking he may have noticed her stumble or something. Then I saw the pic and it’s absolutely clear what he was doing!
Hope he doesn’t let her get away with it.
http://baltimoregazette.com/clinton-received-debate-questions-week-debate/
"Clinton Received Debate Questions Week Before Debate"
"The first presidential debate was held and Hillary Clinton was proclaimed the winner by the media. Indeed Clinton was able to turn in a strong debate performance, but did she do so fairly? Multiple reports and leaked information from inside the Clinton camp claim that the Clinton campaign was given the entire set of debate questions an entire week before the actual debate.
Earlier last week an NBC intern was seen hand delivering a package to Clinton’s campaign headquarters, according to multiple sources. The package was not given to secretarial staff, as would normally happen, but the intern was instead ushered into the personal office of Clinton campaign manager Robert Mook. Members of the Clinton press corps from several media organizations were in attendance at the time, and a reporter from Fox News recognized the intern, but said he was initially confused because the NBC intern was dressed like a Fed Ex employee. The reporter from Fox questioned campaign staff about the intern, but campaign staff at first claimed ignorance and then claimed that it was just a Fed Ex employee who had already left.
No reporters present who had seen the intern dressed as a Fed Ex employee go into Mook’s office saw him leave by the same front entrance. The Fox reporter who recognized the intern also immediately looked outside of the campaign headquarters and noted that there were no Fed Ex vehicles parked outside. Clinton seemed to have scripted responses ready for every question she was asked at the first debate. She had facts and numbers memorized for specific questions that it is very doubtful she would have had without being furnished the questions beforehand. The entire mainstream media has specifically been trying to portray Trump as a racist and a poor candidate.
By furnishing Clinton with the debate questions NBC certainly hoped to make Clinton appear much more knowledgeable and competent than Trump. And though it is unlikely that anyone will be able to conclusively prove that Clinton was given the debate questions, it seems both logical and likely."
What I noticed is that on the split screen anyway - not all channels used it - her mouth and words were out of sync. Seriously.
Trump’s was ok.
Trump probably wanted see for himself before he takes action. There are many jammer devices on the market for only a few hundred dollars. And Trump should get the ones that are tuneable to certain frequencies that ear pieces would broadcast on. ...Two more debates to go.
>>She was recalling words exactly as she rehearsed 50 times the past week.
*********************************************************
And isn’t it amazing how well she remembered for this, but couldn’t seem to remember much when interviewed by the FBI!!!
How many times did she invoke the “I don’t recall” excuse for that interview? I know, dirty rotten liar, but how Americans would love to see her exposed.
Maybe those who use Twitter should start a #JamHerFrequency hashtag right before the next debate??
she had the questions beforehand
and the ear piece
incredible, really
He was no 'Cleaner'. He handed those papers off to Holt.
BAM! Unfortunately, it won’t matter to most.
then, pray tell, what did she spend so much time looking at down on the podium?
after the “debate” ended, did a handler unlock and then remove an item (box or book- holding a screen device from her podium or not?? someone posted there was a telltake glow, like an ipad or notebook screen.
Hillary knew what topics were coming and how they were to be asked. She had to know to rehearse. She is NOT a spontaneous -or very intelligent - person. People do everything for her.
post a vanity with these photos - powerful indictment of her being a trained seal
“There are many jammer devices on the market for only a few hundred dollars.”
I hope they do that. She’s gotten away with it at least twice that we know of, and there’s no reason to believe she won’t do it again.
That microphone, being already secured...
where did it go?
Could they have conspired to feint the ear-piece and pass it along since it was inside the secure zone?
/tin-foil
“lucky to have a memory that doesn’t faulter under pressure”...
And yet...
When called upon to testify under oath she has great trouble “recalling” so very many events and actions and conversations. Guess its good to be a Democrat who can have it both ways!
Exactly. Hil-liar.
There’s no necklace in the frontal but clearly something on the neck on the sideview
It doesn’t matter, it just makes her seem like it’s scripted so let her do it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.