Brave New World indeed.
1 posted on
09/13/2016 9:06:57 AM PDT by
C19fan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: C19fan
Just what we need. Have the women abort their babies so that confused men can have theirs.
2 posted on
09/13/2016 9:08:08 AM PDT by
Parmy
(II don't know how to past the images.)
To: C19fan
Yikes! Baby born with the DNA from to men? Even I don’t want that.
3 posted on
09/13/2016 9:08:26 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(<a href="https://imgflip.com/i/1adpjl"><img src="https://i.imgflip.com/1adpjl.jpg" title="made at im)
To: C19fan
To: C19fan
aka.....producing freaks of nature...
To: C19fan
Its the next step after fatherless babies, which is rampant in most cities today.
6 posted on
09/13/2016 9:09:47 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: C19fan
Bastards. May God rain Holy Hell down on those scientists.
7 posted on
09/13/2016 9:10:06 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: C19fan
The one positive aspect I can see in this would be the ability to rebuild the Y chromosome. Since the Y cannot benefit from contributions from both parents, it has degraded over time.
To: C19fan
Two Y-chromosomes?
What could possibly go wrong?
9 posted on
09/13/2016 9:12:30 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
To: C19fan
I thought the big thing in this sort of research was the fatherless baby, allowing feminists to maintain that men were unnecessary. New research puts the shoe on the other foot, so to speak.
Brave New World, indeed, as you said. I think the full (suitably modified for our times) quote is: “Brave New World, that hath such perverts in it.”
To: C19fan
Motherless babies could be on the horizon...
Another writer who neither lived in an inner city nor spent time in Africa.
11 posted on
09/13/2016 9:14:21 AM PDT by
golux
To: C19fan; All
12 posted on
09/13/2016 9:19:58 AM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: C19fan
13 posted on
09/13/2016 9:20:34 AM PDT by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: C19fan
I guess we just need more soma
15 posted on
09/13/2016 9:22:37 AM PDT by
Nifster
(Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
To: C19fan
Awaiting the imminent arrival of the baby of Little Lindsay and Juan McCain.
16 posted on
09/13/2016 9:23:53 AM PDT by
House Atreides
(Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
To: C19fan
Something is seriously wrong with a person who creates a new human individual in a way not in conformity with the way that nature has devised and implemented.
17 posted on
09/13/2016 9:30:07 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(The media is acting full-on as the Democratic Party's press agency now: Robert Spencer)
To: C19fan
To: C19fan
Read the whole piece. The truth is that the “researchers” DID have to start with an egg cell to created reproduced mice. So, the “motherless” meme is just propaganda from homo-agenda-parading-as-”science.”
19 posted on
09/13/2016 9:33:50 AM PDT by
fwdude
(If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
To: C19fan
Yeah, this may be a bridge too far. The irony is, “womyn” who thought men wouldn’t be needed other than to provide the necessary goo for reproduction, may find themselves not needed at all!
20 posted on
09/13/2016 9:38:36 AM PDT by
bk1000
(A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory.)
To: C19fan
Talk about the ultimate push and drive to complete the whole “children are the property of the community” and “it takes a village” mentality?!?
This is EFFING SCARY SH!T! At least it should be, to normal thinking people!!
21 posted on
09/13/2016 9:41:40 AM PDT by
ExTxMarine
(Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
To: C19fan
Alternative headlines. Scientists closer to proving "chicken came first" theory.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson