Motherless babies possible as scientists create live offspring without need for female egg

UK Telegraph ^ | September 13, 2016 | Sarah Knapton

[C19fan]

Motherless babies could be on the horizon after scientists discovered a method of creating offspring without the need for a female egg. The landmark experiment by the University of Bath rewrites 200 years of biology teaching and could pave the way for a baby to be born from the DNA of two men.

[ExTxMarine]

Talk about the ultimate push and drive to complete the whole “children are the property of the community” and “it takes a village” mentality?!?

This is EFFING SCARY SH!T! At least it should be, to normal thinking people!!

[amihow]

Yes. They are bastards who do not realize, as do other rapists and sport fuxxxrs of the world that children have a right to know in the back of their psyches, that they began in a grand act of passion in a loving, faithful, permanent marriage.

[dragonblustar]

Alternative headlines. Scientists closer to proving "chicken came first" theory.

[Boogieman]

Motherless children have a hard time
When their mother is gone.
Motherless children have a hard time
When their mother is gone.

Motherless children have such a hard time.
There’s all that weepin’ and all that cryin’.
Motherless children, they have such a hard time
When their mother is gone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDr0f7XR_kI

[Dr. Sivana]

Is it time for Maureen Dowd to write a sequel?

[xzins]

Applause!

[4yearlurker]

“In the year 2525.....”

“Pick your son...pick your daughter too..”

“From the bottom of a long black tube..”

[Mouton]

Society of divorce lawyers just went into convulsions.

[Flick Lives]

Nexus 7

[al_c]

Scientists playing God. This will not end well.

[JamesP81]

Just what we need. Have the women abort their babies so that confused men can have theirs.

On the flip side, it's a clear and present threat to feminism as an ideology. Just depends on how you look at it.

I still think it's a bad idea. There are some things that, just because we can do them, doesn't mean that we should.

[pepsi_junkie]

Since the Y cannot benefit from contributions from both parents, it has degraded over time.

Says who?

Oh. I see it now. Carry on.

[Secret Agent Man]

Not too long ago thy were publishing articles about not needing men to make babies. That they would go the way of the dinosaur.

Schaudenfreude can really bite back hard.

Obviously good parents of both sexes is the best for kids.

[afsnco]

My, my. How natural. /sarc