Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity....not so much.
Posted on 06/17/2016 6:47:36 PM PDT by drewh
Several weeks before he massacred 49 at an Orlando gay nightclub, Muslim terrorist Omar Seddique Mateen transferred over his interest in his Florida home to his older sister and Afghan brother-in-law, property records show — an indication the family possibly had some knowledge of his martyrdom plans.
Authorities say the fatally shot Mateen clearly was prepared to die in a gun battle with police during the June 12 attack, the deadliest act of terrorism on U.S. soil since 9/11.
On April 5, Mateen “quit-claimed” the deed on his Port St. Lucie, Fla., house, signing it over to his sister, Sabrina Abasin, and his brother-in-law Mustafa Abasin for just $10 according to county property records. The records list his wife Noor Salman as a witness in the curious real estate transaction.
Mateen’s wife, who is expected to be charged as an accessory in her husband’s attack, reportedly has told authorities Mateen began casing targets as early as April. He was regularly training with firearms well before April.
Earlier this week, the mysterious brother-in-law — Mustafa Abasin, aka Mustafa Aurakzai — escorted the widowed Salman, who wore a hoodie to shield her face from cameras, to the Port St. Lucie home to collect belongings. Florida state records indicate he was born in Afghanistan.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
[[My question is this: Why would the wife sign away her home?]]
Never use western logic with muslims.
Did you forget she is just property ?
Seems like maybe his wife wasn’t supposed to,survive him
Maybe she was supposed to help him kill people like the San Bernadino psycho team
“Omar Mateen Gave ‘Quti Claim’ House Deed to Brother for $10 -- Wife Noor Salman Witnessed Transfer"
didn't match the title found at the source. To avoid duplication we ask all Freepers to refrain from altering titles or making up their own titles.
Thanks.
By April, the die was cast.
Yeah. They are all involved. But I’d like to know more about his wife’s participation. There are reports that he beat her frequently, so she may have been too frightened of him to say anything. I’d like that cleared up.
Trump was criticized for saying that there were Muslims who knew what he was planning yet did nothing. Trump was right again.
He quit-claimed it to them... the $10 entry is just a formality. The interesting part is the "wife" knew about it.
Because Muslim women aren’t allowed to own property under Sharia law.
I wonder what gays will do for retribution.
Will they hunt down those who delight in slaughtering them? Or will they go after the cookie bakers who refuse bake for them?
I’m betting Christian bakers are in deep trouble.
wood chipper
Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity....not so much.
They are not like we are. To them the woman is nothing without as man. She is left to be taken in and owned in another man's home as a charity wife, probably of the brother-in-law.
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia
in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. Improvident habits, slovenly
systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of
property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded
sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its
dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must
belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or
a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam
has ceased to be a great power among men.""Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the
brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die. But the influence
of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund,
Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising faith. It has already spread
throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were
it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science
against which it had vainly struggled - the civilisation of modern Europe might
fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."-- Winston Churchill
He didn’t give it to his wife?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppercorn_(legal)
A peppercorn is also used in more balanced contracts, where one side wishes to conceal the nature of their payment. For example, since real estate contracts are generally matters of public record, the purchaser of a house may not wish to list the exact amount of the payment on the contract. But there must be some specific payment listed in the contract, or the contract will be considered void for lack of consideration. So the contract may be written to reflect that the house is being sold in return for “ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration”. The ten dollars is the “peppercorn” that provides concrete consideration and ensures that the contract is valid, while the actual amount paid for the house is hidden and referred to only as the “good and valuable consideration”.
Exactly. That’s why the entire thing is misleading. Now, I wouldn’t expect a bunch of non-lawyers to know these things, but sometimes a little due diligence before posting and commenting can be helpful. Nothing more, nothing less.
Looks like Terrorism is the “Family Business”, as with the Tsarnaevs.
So
The question is the motivation .
Why quick deed a huge house when you have a wife and child .
She witnessed it.
They were plotting and worried about lawsuit of the victims families.
They all plotted together .
We have to kill the families of jihadis. It’s the only thing that will stop them.
A Rose Garden speech with the shooters fam?
Oh, that’s probably all true. As far as “witnessing” that’s also another legal term that has nothing to do with any of the substance of it. Don’t get me wrong, I’m with everyone here that these people are all scum and probably knew. I’m just trying to clarify that a lot of the technical legal terms of deeding property are completely unrelated to any of the motive. That’s all. People are reading too much into the legal terminology here. The question IS the motivation. You are exactly right, but that has nothing to do with the 10 dollars or the witnessing of the transfer. That’s all just legalese and part of any deed transfer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.