Skip to comments.
(Vanity) The Mitt Romney Doomsday Scenario
Posted on 05/07/2016 9:19:58 PM PDT by GLDNGUN
Mitt Romney running as a independent in the 2016 general Presidential election is quickly becoming a very strong possibility, folks. The scary and nearly unthinkable result is that he could end up not just denying Donald Trump the Presidency but could become President himself. Think I'm crazy? Take a closer look.
TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2012election; 2016election; backstabberromney; billiejokristol; billiekristol; billkristol; billybobkristol; billykristol; election2012; election2016; liarromney; loserromney; massachusetts; miltromley; mittromney; newyork; romney; romney4clinton; romney4deval; romney4obama; romney4soros; saboteurromney; theweeklystandard; trump; weeklystandard; williamkristol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-153 next last
The NeverTrump folks are desperately searching for someone to run as a 3rd-party candidate to stop Trump. They would need someone with instant name recognition, money, nothing to lose in the way of current elective office and the ability to unite the NeverTrump blue bloods and NeverTrump conservatives. Romney would get all sorts of endorsements from big-name GOP pols like the Bushes, Graham, Sasse, etc., perhaps even Ted Cruz. Romney could say he is doing it reluctantly to "save the country" and offer Americans a 3rd option. The GOPs that support him instead of the party's standard-bearer can rationalize and say "Hey, Romney is a Republican and was our party's nominee 4 years ago, so he's mainstream".
Would Romney have a chance of beating Trump and dem nominee in the general election? No, I would assume Romney would come in a distant third. So then how could he possibly end up as President?
All he has to do is get enough electoral votes to keep both Trump and the dem nominee from getting a majority (270) of electoral votes. Romney could do that by winning just 1 state, while Trump and the dem nominee split the other electoral down the middle. In reality Romney could probably peal off 2 or more states, such as Utah and Idaho for starters.
With no candidate getting a majority of electoral votes the election of the President then goes to the House of Representatives, where the top 3 electoral vote getters qualify for the "run off". Each state's Congressional delegations vote and the winner of each state gets 1 vote. So Utah is worth 1 vote, same as California and every other state.
In such a scenario it's safe to assume that the states with a democrat-majority delegation will vote for the democrat nominee straight up. That would be 15 of the 50 states, leaving Trump and Romney to split 33 GOP-majority delegate states. Maine and New Hampshire each are split 1-1 Dem-GOP, so they may be wildcards or may cancel each other out.
Arizona and Colorado have a very slim GOP-majorities in their state delegations, meaning if the GOP reps split their votes between Trump and Romney instead of uniting behind one candidate, those states will also go Dem as the dem reps will all vote for their nominee. That could put the dem nominee up to 17 states, leaving 31 states remaining.
WHO are the GOP office holders in those 31-33 states going to vote for? The outsider Trump? Or establishment Romney? Are those GOP office holders mostly establishment guys themselves? Even if Trump had the most popular and electoral votes, would they vote the will of the people? Or their own self interests? Do I need to even answer that question?
If Romney gets enough GOP state delegations to vote for him to surpass Trump and the Dem, then viola - President Romney.
Almost as bizarrely, the Senate would vote for the VP among the top 2 electoral vote getters, leaving Romney's VP nominee out. A GOP majority Senate would then probably take Trump's VP nominee, assuming it's someone they could abide, like Chris Christie.
This is the nightmare scenario that I fear, where Romney not only denies Trump the Presidency but grabs it for himself.
The fact that Romney knows he would have a chance to do this makes it even more likely he will run.
1
posted on
05/07/2016 9:19:58 PM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
To: GLDNGUN
He would take the Magic Underwear vote in Utah....which could be problematic....
2
posted on
05/07/2016 9:21:13 PM PDT
by
MHT
(,`)
To: GLDNGUN
Nobody is going to vote for that phony Romney.
3
posted on
05/07/2016 9:24:12 PM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
To: MHT
Most likely he would just elect Hillary.
4
posted on
05/07/2016 9:25:54 PM PDT
by
Williams
(Dear God please save us from the democrats. And the republicans.)
To: GLDNGUN
Bullcrap and I say again, Total Bullcrap.
5
posted on
05/07/2016 9:26:00 PM PDT
by
TexasCruzin
( He always hits back.)
To: GLDNGUN
Romney president is far from ideal. But hardly a nightmare.
Hillary is a nightmare
6
posted on
05/07/2016 9:26:26 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: GLDNGUN
It shall be called the “Hillary Clinton Victory Party”. Mittens forgets how many if us held our noses and reluctantly voted for him. He owes it to us to hold his nose and back Trump. Pragmatism Trumps Ideological Purity.
7
posted on
05/07/2016 9:26:29 PM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: GLDNGUN
I voted for Mitt in 2012 but I will not do it again. What happened to the no 3rd party pledge?
To: GLDNGUN
9
posted on
05/07/2016 9:26:52 PM PDT
by
steve86
(Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OMorgair (Latin form: Malachy))
To: GLDNGUN
"Jebbie Old Boy, it would appear that we are back in the saddle!"
To: GLDNGUN
You don’t consider the future prospects of such a perversion of the voters by a Party.
Maybe 10 Congressmen would be happy with only two more years in the House.
11
posted on
05/07/2016 9:28:00 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: GLDNGUN
#nevermitt
I wonder how much Soros and Clinton are paying him.
12
posted on
05/07/2016 9:28:54 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(It's time to TRUMP the race card in America so we can all get along again.)
To: GLDNGUN
There aren't enough people to vote for a luke-warm liberal. He will pull the “NeverTrump conservatives” and that is it. Heck, I signed a Green party for president petition today, so Hillary will have the Green party take some Sanders protest votes away.
I love that I visit my local co-op store for select items. I would have missed the Green party thing, otherwise.
13
posted on
05/07/2016 9:29:03 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: GLDNGUN
He’ll split the Hillary vote, not the Trump vote. Let him run.
To: GLDNGUN
“Mitt Romney running as a independent in the 2016 general Presidential election is quickly becoming a very strong possibility, folks.”
I haven’t seen a single thing that a Romney 3rd party run is a “very strong possibility”. It’s probably not even a very weak possibility given the enormous effort to mount even a barely plausable 3rd party effort. So far, the only thing that seems to have actually happened is that fool Romney met that fool Bill Kristol over “glasses of water”, where they probably wrung their hands like a pair of old ladies.
“The scary and nearly unthinkable result is that he could end up not just denying Donald Trump the Presidency but could become President himself.”
That’s so absurd as to be laughable. Not a snowball’s chance in hell of Romney winning 3rd party when he couldn’t win with all the resources of the GOPe at his disposal 4 years ago, not to mention, 3rd party runs in the U.S. have been complete jokes during modern election history.
15
posted on
05/07/2016 9:29:54 PM PDT
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: GLDNGUN
Not likely, just more wishful thinking of some sore losers and never Trump people. Besides, if I recall correctly, there are state-level dates coming up, maybe even passed that make an independent or 3rd party run difficult at best. Like others are writing, I can’t imaging Romney or another candidate would get much traction.
16
posted on
05/07/2016 9:32:23 PM PDT
by
Reno89519
(Make America Great Again Starts with America First! I stand with Trump.)
To: ConservativeMind
Romney would tie with the Green party candidate. If that; probably more for the G.P.
17
posted on
05/07/2016 9:32:42 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
To: MHT
He would have to win states like VA, NC Wisc, Fla and Ohio to deny someone 270.
To: Parley Baer
Well .. silly .. not doing a 3rd party run .. that doesn’t apply to the GOP-e; didn’t you know that ..????????
19
posted on
05/07/2016 9:35:58 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
("Peace Through Strength")
To: FlingWingFlyer
WoW ..!!! I was wondering that too.
20
posted on
05/07/2016 9:37:04 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
("Peace Through Strength")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-153 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson