Posted on 03/26/2016 7:24:37 PM PDT by ak267
Ouch.
January’s numbers are looking bad for Mark Levin, who has been on a recent Crusade against Donald Trump for his “New York Values.”
(Excerpt) Read more at prntly.com ...
My mistake, that was Trump who wanted to ban those scary black rifles. Getting old.
“Let’s compare Levin’s bankroll with yours”
How bout we compare it to Donald Trump’s?
I heard it also. I get the impression that Rush is listening to the not so great one about Cruz, particularly on the real issue of Cruz’ dubious eligibility. I don’t sense any real research having been done by anyone for either Levin or Rush on the actual issue.
Ouch...right when he’s trying to launch a show in on different media. Not good timing. I like Levin and would like to see him succeed, but he let himself get caught up in the jihad against Trump. It’s bad on either side....
>>Who are these “industry insiders”?
Sundance and the Shills.
Quote:
“Laura Ingraham & Sean Hannity have been breaths of fresh air, both have Pat Buchanan on regularly as well as Newt.”
Agreed. Levin and Limbaugh are history.
I am so fed up with them. I have voted every election since I was old enough, now 81, and have to watch this rabid bunch ruin my country.
I made the mistake of subscribing to LevinTV early on ($60 for a year). I should have waited until the first full week and watched his pilot episodes. Not only would that have been a free test drive, but I could have evaluated the show before buying. His tv show is just too theoretical and boring, especially after listening to the radio show. And if I’d known Levin would endorse Cruz on his third tv episode, I sure wouldn’t have subscribed. I haven’t watched his tv show since that third episode. Wish I could get my money back.
Like we’re supposedly to believe anything from that site?
On Levin’s Facebook and Twitter page, he calls it the “Trump/Enquirer” scandal. So disingenuous.
I was a long-time listener of Levin and have turned him off. I trusted him to vet the candidates, not propagandize for them, which is what he’s doing for Cruz. He’s not talking about the many problems with Cruz I’ve read online and giving us an honest, balanced discussion. He’s only attacking Trump and defending Cruz, often to the point where he seems frantic and desperate.
I now consider Levin to be the establishment’s controlled opposition, meant to gain our trust and then lead us off the cliff at critical moments.
Next they’ll be telling us that Levin is a secret Muslim.
Regardless of who’s endorsed whom, charges of favoritism or what have you, I’ve never been able to endure listening to Savage. He’s always been shrill. Rush has had his moments in the sun, he’s also had his moments of apparent shilling. It’s a difficult balancing act, keeping all sides happy during a hotly contested primary. But, to say that Savage is squandering the Rush audience handed to him in that time slot due to endorsing Trump is just wrong, he’s always had a big drop off in listeners by comparison. Apparently I’m not the only one who can’t bear listening to him for any length of time.
Faux-free household since shortly after those debates.
Meant for someone else?
Not applicable. You’re the guy who suggested that Levin has one listener. Levin doesn’t build hotels or casinos.
I would concur on that. But he is in the tank for Cruz. His prerogative, though.
Yes indeed, but more recently wasn't he also talking up Rubio as the great savior of the day, until he cratered a few times? Whatever the case - Levin is really pathetic - no longer is he our huckleberry. Why can't these people see Cruz for what he is, a real squalid scumbag?
Just be sure that the subscription does not auto renew upon expiration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.