RUSH LIMBAUGH SPARKS OUTRAGE After Suggesting Trump is Pandering for KKK Vote

Gateway Pundit ^ | 2-29-16 | Jim Hoft

[dlt]

On Sunday Donald Trump went on CNN and was asked once again about David Duke’s endorsement. Trump told Jake Tapper he didn’t know anything about David Duke or white supremacy.

This sent shock waves across the liberal media and GOP establishment circles.

[FredZarguna]

It's not amusing watching mindless Trumpbots pick at everything said by people who are real conservatives in order to justify the thin-skinned "responses" of their childish, poseur, candidate who is a liberal, has always been a liberal, and will revert to being a liberal as soon as he can throw you away.

That is not amusing.

[odawg]

“Rush is supposed to present all candidates’ sides.”

Can you not read? That was my complaint. He presents Cruz’s side affirmatively, and then basically attacks Trump. He only started doing that about the time of the Iowa caucus.

Just before the New Hampshire primary, he spent about three days stroking Rubio, the little amnesty pimp, saying he was a ‘full-throated conservative, a Reagan disciple, and only was for the Gang of Eight bill because he was just a green senator, ignoring the fact that Rubio stills calls for amnesty. Then he turns around immediately and condemns amnesty.

He constantly praises Cruz, says he is the nearest thing to Reagan we will ever see in our lifetime, etc.

It is his show and he would be intellectually honest if he just came out and endorsed Cruz officially rather than sneaking it in every day and claiming he is just giving out disinterested analysis and twisting things around.

That is why he has caused such an outrage by saying that Trump was pandering to the KKK vote.

[kiryandil]

Six minutes, Fred.

Tick-Tock. :)

[FredZarguna]

It’s CJRT. Time to read it again.

[Lazamataz]

For the last time: he noted that Trump had already disavowed David Duke and the KKK several times in the past.

I'm glad Rush did that. I'm disappointed that he went on to insinuate he was now courting them.

This meant that his failure to do this on Sunday was inexplicable.

Lends some credence to Trump's assertion that his earpiece wasn't working, eh what?

[an amused spectator]

You appear to be out of your league.

The floundering is very amusing. Please continue. ;-)

[XenaLee]

He hasn’t attacked Trump though. Not to my knowledge. And no, this KKK fiasco doesn’t count as an ‘attack’ in my book. Sounds more like Rush was trying to rationalize the bizarre behavior by Trump when he pretended to not know who Duke was.

Again, what other attacks has Rush supposedly made on Trump?

[kiryandil]

LOL! Not bad, Fred!

How many do you have?

[FredZarguna]

Lends some credence to Trump's assertion that his earpiece wasn't working, eh what?

As Rush said, verbatim: "Hey, my speculation’s as good as anybody else’s, because I can think of no reason that he would purposely dodge, when he’s not dodged it before."

At that point, Trump had offered no rationale. Rush gave him a couple. To misconstrue that as an attack is simply a mistake. And typical of the Trump cult, which goes after anyone not sufficiently enamored -- or even perceived to be enamored -- of their candidate.

[FredZarguna]

Lends some credence to Trump's assertion that his earpiece wasn't working, eh what?

As Rush said, verbatim: "Hey, my speculation’s as good as anybody else’s, because I can think of no reason that he would purposely dodge, when he’s not dodged it before."

At that point, Trump had offered no rationale. Rush gave him a couple. To misconstrue that as an attack is simply a mistake. And typical of the Trump cult, which goes after anyone not sufficiently enamored -- or even perceived to be enamored -- of their candidate.

[kiryandil]

So, Fred - this mindless Trumpbot wishes to know which of the CJRT books a mindless Cruzbot like yourself managed to make it through.

Or did you have to get the audiobooks? LOL! :)

[an amused spectator]

What’s with the stuttering, FredZarguna? ;-)

[an amused spectator]

What’s with the stuttering, FredZarguna? ;-)

[FredZarguna]

Everyone who's serious has a first edition Silmarillion and first edition complete History of Middle Earth. I used to argue with that f**king moron David Salo on the usenet [rec.arts.books.tolkien and alt.fan.tolkien.] What a tool; you're probably a pal of his...

[odawg]

I am tired of this. Check out my forum page.

[pollywog]

Agreed Totally out of context, period!! Rush will address this first thing tomorrow.

[pollywog]

not on your life!! Unless Trump removes our freedom of speech!!

[kiryandil]

nyet

[pollywog]

That’s excactly what he said.... the emphasis was the SUNDAY SHOW... more than what he said!geez...

[pollywog]

non-conservative???? TRUMP is NON CONSERVATIVE ..