Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Says Apple Should Hack San Bernardino Attacker Phone
ABC News ^ | 2/17/2016 | Ryan Struyk

Posted on 02/17/2016 8:49:09 AM PST by pgyanke

Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump bashed the tech company Apple today for refusing to help investigators access the iPhone of a San Bernardino attacker.

"I agree 100 percent with the courts," he said on "Fox and Friends" this morning. "In that case, we should open it up."

"To think that Apple won't allow us to get into her cell phone -- who do they think they are?" Trump said. "No, we have to open it up."

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2016election; apple; california; election2016; newyork; sanbernadino; sanbernardino; trump; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-226 next last
To: dfwgator

On that phone could be the names of other terrorist in Southern California,for all we know they may have plans to kill school children or poison LA’s water supply, but lets not order a company to hack that phone. That’s crazy, lunatic fringe, insanity.


21 posted on 02/17/2016 9:04:03 AM PST by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

No. Apple is siding with terrorists.


22 posted on 02/17/2016 9:05:04 AM PST by bjcoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

Who cares who is here still ready to commit crimes etc.

The people need to realize that unless they are willing to stand up and drive out the invaders, then it won’t matter who is where.

How many attacks need to happen before it is called a war?

How many more lives need to be lost before people do what is needed?

Anything else is just time wasted.


23 posted on 02/17/2016 9:05:25 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: heights

So you give a backdoor to iPhones, terrorists will just find other means to communicate. All that’s lost is our freedom, and we are just as insecure as ever.


24 posted on 02/17/2016 9:05:30 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

Yep and the judge needs to bring into the court room the Apple executives and ask them to either play rock, scissors, paper or flip coins to see who goes to jail, immediately.


25 posted on 02/17/2016 9:05:32 AM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

Trump doesn’t even understand that Apple can’t help the government hack into that phone even if they wanted to. So much for the “smartest man in the room”, LOL!


26 posted on 02/17/2016 9:05:55 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Why can’t Apple simple have their own technicians get the info from the phone and give the FBI the info. Then there is no need for any backdoors.

Because Apple has no more capability to do that than the FBI. According to the letter Apple released, the FBI has essentially asked Apple to create a new version of iOS that includes a backdoor, install that new version on the cell phone, and then recover the data.

The problem, of course, is that once Apple does that, the FBI would know that the iOS backdoor exists. What do you think would happen the next time the FBI wanted data from an encrypted iphone?

Also, once Apple creates the software, there is always a risk that the code will get out into the wild, giving any hacker who wants it access to any encrypted iphone.

27 posted on 02/17/2016 9:06:08 AM PST by zedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: zedee

Thanks, that makes sense.


28 posted on 02/17/2016 9:06:53 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

“Donald Trump bashed the tech company Apple today for refusing to help investigators access the iPhone of a San Bernardino attacker.”

Fail.

You proposed temporarily banning mohammedans from entry, Mr. Trump, which I would disagree with to the extent of amending that proposal to a permanent ban. A suicidal immigration policy that insists on spying on citizens as the only means to keep us safe, rather than keeping the throat cutters who are causing the terrorist risk out of the country, is a nonstarter.


29 posted on 02/17/2016 9:07:34 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

With a Court order, Yes.


30 posted on 02/17/2016 9:07:35 AM PST by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: heights

Your privacy will be invaded also.


31 posted on 02/17/2016 9:07:42 AM PST by davidb56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
I'm no legal techie but why doesn't the FBI just ask Apple to record what's on the phone and give the info to the FBI? Apple could then maintain the secrecy of their encryption codes.
32 posted on 02/17/2016 9:08:08 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I was just reading about this on Karl Deninger's Market Ticker blog Here's part of his explanation of what the FBI is asking for:

So the FBI wants a custom firmware load that will allow:
Any number of password attempts. No "10 wrong and you're done" auto-wipe.
Any means of entering them. No "must key them on the screen."
This then means the FBI can attempt to "brute force" the password using a computer over the USB interface and, they demanded, any other means such as Wifi, cellular or Bluetooth!
The latter would mean that for the future they would not even have to physically posses the device. That's right -- they could hack it any time they wanted, from anywhere, at any time.

FWIW, that is his explanation of the scope of the request. If it's true, the request seems prospectively broad.

33 posted on 02/17/2016 9:08:45 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: heights

“Sure we would never use backdoor access without a warrant....You can trust us.”


34 posted on 02/17/2016 9:08:55 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke

The FBI surely has a warrant and are asking for assistance from the manufacturer. How is this different than any other criminal case?


35 posted on 02/17/2016 9:09:30 AM PST by GeaugaRepublican ("Donald Trump is the last hope for America." Phyllis Schlafly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Very disappointed in Trump here. Looks like I’m shifting to Cruz.


36 posted on 02/17/2016 9:09:40 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reardon

Exactly. It seems the Trumpies around here aren’t any sharper than their candidate on this question. The FBI and NSA can’t “hack” the encryption and neither can Apple. Either Donald knows that, which means he’s just grandstanding, or he doesn’t know that, which means he’s just going off half-cocked, as usual.


37 posted on 02/17/2016 9:10:00 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Apple lost me on this. They can't allow us to get information that could disclose a terrorist network inside the US? This is not fishing for information, but rather, obtaining evidence for people who killed 14 Americans and wounded 30 others.

Apple is more worried about international sales than they are about our national security. Sad commentary on how low we have fallen as a nation. It exposes how little allegiance these global corporations have to a particular country even one where they have their headquarters. No wonder these globalists could care less about the American worker. They move jobs abroad and import foreign workers to be trained by the very Americans whom they will replace.

38 posted on 02/17/2016 9:10:08 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Right! if it was your kid it might help, you’d say no, don’t do it, the law is more important.


39 posted on 02/17/2016 9:10:13 AM PST by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I think since the owner of the phone is dead and we could get some information such as possible other people involved. I am supporting this. We are not talking about little 17 year old Stacy who was texting her boyfriend back and forth. This is serious business and if we can possibly stop another terror attack don’t you think this phone of a dead person might be ok?


40 posted on 02/17/2016 9:10:18 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson