If Hillary Clinton was even slightly more presidential than a pile of horse crap, she would have been elected in 2008. She didn’t even win the Democratic nomination, which makes you wonder why anyone thinks she’s more suited for the office eight years — and multiple legal problems — later.
From your keyboard to God’s eyes...
I wish I could agree with this, but part of me feels like it’s already been decided that she’s going to be president no matter what. The media is treating her like she already IS the president. This feels like something that is going to be forced upon us no matter what. I’m not giving up hope, I’m not telling anyone else to give up, but there’s this strange feeling that the decision has already been made.
-PJ
Her confidence confounds me. Why is she so dang confident?
That is the thing that makes me doubt your conclusion. She’s in on something we do not know.
Those are very good points, and while some have said that the decision of Joe Biden to not enter the race for President is good news for Hillary, I believe it does not bode well at all for her, if Biden had entered the race, Hillary’s zombie-supporters would have swarmed him in every way possible, trashing him 24/7 which would not have done much for ‘party unity’.
However, if Biden has even an inkling of what lies ahead legally for the Clinton Crime Syndicate, his decision not to enter the race at this point is wise, because WHEN Hillary is indicted (and she will be, her offenses are far more serious than those that brought down General David Petraeus), it will be impossible for her to continue and she will end her campaign.
Call that wishful thinking but it is political reality as I see it (imagine the hue and cry that would have ensued across the political spectrum if the Watergate scandal had broken in the middle of the ‘72 campaign, there would have been even greater pressure on Nixon to resign, rather than to continue a re-election campaign while being threatened with or actually indicted).
And even if an indictment does not take place before the ‘RAT convention, the increasing erosion in her support will make her a wounded animal by the time her alleged coronation draws near, and I believe she will withdraw for ‘health reasons’.
Whenever she withdraws (and I firmly believe she will), THAT is when it won’t matter if Joe Biden was competing in the primaries, he will be drafted at the convention, all of the former Hillary rivals will coalesce behind Biden, and of course Emperor Barky will issue that pardon to HRC on January 19, 2017.
Just my take on it, YMMV.
Her next stroke will take care of the problem.
If HRC is doomed, I don’t know it either. Seems to have the full support of the little American voters
Poll | Date | Sample | MoE |
Clinton (D)
|
Trump (R)
|
Spread |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCP Average | 9/7 - 10/17 | -- | -- | 45.7 | 43.2 | Clinton +2.5 |
CNN/ORCCNN/ORC | 10/14 - 10/17 | 956 RV | 3.0 | 50 | 45 | Clinton +5 |
FOX NewsFOX News | 10/10 - 10/12 | 1004 RV | 3.0 | 40 | 45 | Trump +5 |
PPP (D)PPP (D) | 10/1 - 10/4 | 1338 RV | 2.7 | 44 | 44 | Tie |
NBC News/Wall St. JrnlNBC/WSJ | 9/20 - 9/24 | RV | -- | 49 | 39 | Clinton +10 |
QuinnipiacQuinnipiac | 9/17 - 9/21 | 1574 RV | 2.5 | 45 | 43 | Clinton +2 |
ABC News/Wash PostABC/WP | 9/7 - 9/10 | 821 RV | 4.0 | 46 | 43 | Clinton +3 |
If Hillary is elected, I think she gos into office with a mindset of “Obama legacy? I’ll show you what a real legacy looks like!”
I think Hillary's moment has passed, but she doesn't know it yet. She won't go away quietly, though.
Hillary is doom. “I’m ready for Hillaryous” (aren’t you?) People will die to get her elected. The question is which ones?
She’s toast. Don’t be a victim.
Additionally she thinks that being at an event featuring Katie Perry and a large crowd makes it look like they came to see her.
Fake is as Fake does
Always good to be optimistic I suppose...
Somehow I doubt that Obama hates the Clintons enough to let a Republican win the presidency.
Debating a Hillary supporter should be lead-pipe-cinch easy. Just ask if they approve of Citizens United. When they say no, get them to explain why it is important to keep business money out of politics. Set the hook good. Then point out the money laundering scheme by which Hillary benefited from laundered foreign government money while Secretary of State. And ask why they favor voting for someone who is on the take from foreign governments.Ask your state legislator why your state allows someone who did that - in violation of Article I Section 9 - to be on the ballot for electors to be appointed, as the Constitution puts it, under the control of the legislature. Electors are not elected, they are appointed - so the state has the authority to decide who may not get selected. Any purple or blue state which passes a law against accepting laundered foreign government money and then getting the states Electoral votes will cast a near-veto vote against nominating Hillary. While doing nothing more than putting de minimus teeth in the constitutions prohibition of her sort of corruption. It is not even a criminal matter. It wouldnt even require disgorging her ill-gotten gains.
Obama was Elected in 2008. He was Reelected in 2012.
Nothing is impossible.