Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

Those are very good points, and while some have said that the decision of Joe Biden to not enter the race for President is good news for Hillary, I believe it does not bode well at all for her, if Biden had entered the race, Hillary’s zombie-supporters would have swarmed him in every way possible, trashing him 24/7 which would not have done much for ‘party unity’.

However, if Biden has even an inkling of what lies ahead legally for the Clinton Crime Syndicate, his decision not to enter the race at this point is wise, because WHEN Hillary is indicted (and she will be, her offenses are far more serious than those that brought down General David Petraeus), it will be impossible for her to continue and she will end her campaign.

Call that wishful thinking but it is political reality as I see it (imagine the hue and cry that would have ensued across the political spectrum if the Watergate scandal had broken in the middle of the ‘72 campaign, there would have been even greater pressure on Nixon to resign, rather than to continue a re-election campaign while being threatened with or actually indicted).

And even if an indictment does not take place before the ‘RAT convention, the increasing erosion in her support will make her a wounded animal by the time her alleged coronation draws near, and I believe she will withdraw for ‘health reasons’.

Whenever she withdraws (and I firmly believe she will), THAT is when it won’t matter if Joe Biden was competing in the primaries, he will be drafted at the convention, all of the former Hillary rivals will coalesce behind Biden, and of course Emperor Barky will issue that pardon to HRC on January 19, 2017.

Just my take on it, YMMV.


7 posted on 10/25/2015 6:53:56 AM PDT by mkjessup ("Hillary was an unethical, dishonest lawyer and a liar which is why she was fired" - Jerry Zeifman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mkjessup

Why is there little mention of the fact, HRC’s indiscretions began as far back as Watergate when the committee chose to remove her for unethical and possibly illegal activity. The record recalls an incident where she removed and relocated some legal files that were pertinent to the defense of President Nixon.


14 posted on 10/25/2015 7:07:26 AM PDT by TiaS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson