Posted on 09/01/2015 12:46:36 PM PDT by ExyZ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=any4cI6nAf8&index=1&list=PLPnLjoW07bV0zxAVQcjXZoHLibjuRoZas
The Waco shootout at a Twin Peaks restaurant flooded with bikers from clubs such as the Cossacks, the Bandidos, and many more is explained with witness, Richard Luther. Luthers experience as a Cossack, the shootout, thoughts on a possible conspiracy, and the 33 days he would go on to spend in jail after the shootout is explored. Learn the ugly truth about the police handling of the situation, the cruel and unusual punishment that bikers suffered in jail, and the pieces of the puzzle that dont add up, in this Antidote interview hosted by Michael Parker.
In b4tg
More blame the cops crap? Don’t get in shootouts is my advice.
Unfortunate there are no captions, rendering the video inscrutable to me. Would you be kind enough to summarize the key conclusions?
LOL
Eye witness tells of four to five minutes of terror as cops held bikers at gun point until they died
Amazing how they will mass arrest and hold US Citizens without trial, evidence, or obtainable bail after being attacked by Para Military Police. Yet Slimes can chop heads and attempt mass murder and their club members are all considered innocent even though they fly colors 5x a day and attend Death to Mankind services every Friday!
We share perceptions on this, Mr. Teesdale.
I also suspect that this recitation by Luther is somewhat self-serving and divergent from the factual. It feels as though it’s the agreed upon story from the Cossack side.
I would add that interviewee also mentioned ‘automatic rifle fire’ which is something we’ve heard from another witness somewhere in the dim past. I still doubt that even police in panic mode would be that idiotic.
I’m also curious as to whether this interview is in violation of the gag order.
Interesting.
If the police shot a suspect, I can see that, not that I think it is the right thing to do.
However, under that M.O., If I am shot by a third party, the police preventing aid (at gunpoint) is beyond unreasonable, and fodder for a wrongful death suit.
The inference is that the police did the shooting.
BTTT
Ping.
Thanks for the ping. Added keyword waco.
Have not read the review but did just listen to the whole interview. The one thing that stood out to me was Luther giving his recollection of hearing pistol fire then "within seconds" rifle fire. Said it sounded like Viet Nam. Frustrating thing was the interviewer did not press him for any detail, like "How many seconds? Five? Fifteen? Thirty?"
This is important because Brent Stroman said that his men Waco PD) were in their cars when the first shots were fired. This makes for a reasonable suspicion that LE other than Waco PD fired the first rifle shots. This is important, because the DOJ has been silent on this thing while there is a reasonable suspicion that BATF were the initial shooters from the LE side, and DOJ is pretending like it has nothing to do with them.
Luther said he hit the ground when rifle fire commenced and could not determine source of the fire. He crawled inside.
Luther opines that bikers killed 3 and LE killed the rest and put injuries on several
Good post. Another thing confirmed in this report, and the single most curious factor in the case of what went on that day is that this man saw police positions going in... It has never made any sense to me that a premeditated and intentional rumble would go forward within a virtual fishbowl with LEOs around the perimeter.
Bikers, as a rule, are not fools... many of them having served in war, and many more having experienced less than favorable treatment with law enforcement... This guy was sharp enough to be uncomfortable with what he saw as a flanking movement by the Bandidos - It seems incredibly unlikely to me that he and others would not be just as keenly aware of those LEO positions, and their very qualified dominance over the battlefield in that parking lot.
IF there was intention on the biker’s part, from either side, it seems pretty short-sighted to continue without sending scouts to position in such a way as to counter that effective dominance, because otherwise, any idiot would be able to predict the ensuing turkey-shoot...
It is far more likely that any such premeditated action would be called off to await a day with better odds. I know that if I had rolled up there, and saw such a presence, my radar would be screaming at me, and I would have rolled right on by (as proven on several occasions in my life). It makes no sense at all.
Was there an agent provocateur involved? I dunno and can't and won't construct a theory based on so many still unknowns.
My hope that Federal LE is not completely corrupted grows dimmer every day.
Hiya don-o... hope all is well with y'all. : )
I'll go back and listen again, but I heard him remarking that LE was NOT all that nearby as he arrived.
Right, but he mentions, quite emphatically, placements of both marked and unmarked LEOs... He knew they were there. No doubt, so did others...
And that he could not visually locate the source of the incoming.
Right, though I took that to mean he could not verify because he was on the ground, and could no longer see through the field of combatants- his position would put the surrounding LEO positions on the other side of the fight from him... And while their positions on the perimeter appear elevated, I don't think they are elevated enough to compensate for the view from the ground, through the melee.
Which lends credence that the Fed were deployed (on Don Carlos roof?) ready and itching to rock and roll. Autopsy reports listed many downward trajectories.
While that wouldn't surprise me, his statement hardly qualifies much from his position on the ground, and probably focused in the near vicinity... A 'hail of rifle fire' certainly computes... his hearing was not obstructed... Though his identification of suppressed rifle fire would indicate fairly near positioning - I don't know that you'd hear suppressed fire from the rooftop across the way... Which also certainly does not deny it's existence...
Was there an agent provocateur involved? I dunno and can't and won't construct a theory based on so many still unknowns.
Yep. Agreed.
My hope that Federal LE is not completely corrupted grows dimmer every day.
I have been there for a very long while.
I have never shot a suppressed rifle but I have shot and heard many unsuppressed rifles shooting game animals.
Typically it makes a sound like KaWHUMP. The Ka being the shot and the WHUMP the impact.
I would think it would be difficult to ascertain direction if you were hearing the impacts hitting bodies with little or no sound from the rifles.
This would be different - First you need to realize that suppressed rounds are de-tuned... necessarily sub-sonic, or the suppressor really doesn't do you any good, as the movement of the round through the air breaks the sound barrier... So these would be low-velocity rounds, pretty different from a std. 30 cal deer rifle, I think. I don't think the sound of the suppressed fire would carry much more than 50 yards, far less with all the commotion... You'd hear a whap from the round hitting, but again, not the SMACK you'd hear from a deer gun.
I would think it would be difficult to ascertain direction if you were hearing the impacts hitting bodies with little or no sound from the rifles.
It's pretty difficult to ascertain anyway, in what I would compare to open canyon land (buildings would somewhat create the same effect)... Sound goes strange places... And again, add the commotion and high stress, and one can understand the confusion...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.