Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buckybomb shows potential power of nanoscale explosives
PhysOrg ^ | 3/5/15 | Lisa Zyga

Posted on 03/06/2015 3:35:05 PM PST by LibWhacker

Buckybomb shows potential power of nanoscale explosives

Mar 05, 2015 by Lisa Zyga feature

Buckybomb shows potential power of nanoscale explosives Enlarge
Molecular configuration of an exploding buckybomb. Credit: ACS

(Phys.org)—Scientists have simulated the explosion of a modified buckminsterfullerene molecule (C60), better known as a buckyball, and shown that the reaction produces a tremendous increase in temperature and pressure within a fraction of a second. The nanoscale explosive, which the scientists nickname a "buckybomb," belongs to the emerging field of high-energy nanomaterials that could have a variety of military and industrial applications.

The researchers, Vitaly V. Chaban, Eudes Eterno Fileti, and Oleg V. Prezhdo at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, have published a paper on the simulated buckybomb explosion in a recent issue of The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. Chaban is also with the Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil.

The buckybomb combines the unique properties of two classes of materials: carbon structures and energetic nanomaterials. Carbon materials such as C60 can be chemically modified fairly easily to change their properties. Meanwhile, NO2 groups are known to contribute to detonation and combustion processes because they are a major source of oxygen. So, the scientists wondered what would happen if NO2 groups were attached to C60 molecules: would the whole thing explode? And how?

The simulations answered these questions by revealing the explosion in step-by-step detail. Starting with an intact buckybomb (technically called dodecanitrofullerene, or C60(NO2)12), the researchers raised the simulated temperature to 1000 K (700 °C). Within a picosecond (10-12 second), the NO2 groups begin to isomerize, rearranging their atoms and forming new groups with some of the carbon atoms from the C60. As a few more picoseconds pass, the C60 structure loses some of its electrons, which interferes with the bonds that hold it together, and, in a flash, the large molecule disintegrates into many tiny pieces of diatomic carbon (C2). What's left is a mixture of gases including CO2, NO2, and N2, as well as C2.

Although this reaction requires an initial heat input to get going, once it's going it releases an enormous amount of heat for its size. Within the first picosecond, the temperature increases from 1000 to 2500 K. But at this point the molecule is unstable, so additional reactions over the next 50 picoseconds raise the temperature to 4000 K. At this , the pressure can reach as high as 1200 MPa (more than 10,000 times normal atmospheric pressure), depending on the density of the material.

Chemically speaking, the scientists explain that the heat energy comes from the high density of covalent energy stored by the carbon-carbon bonds in the C60. Because the NO2 groups initiate the reaction, adding more NO2 groups increases the amount of energy released during the explosion. Choosing an appropriate number of these groups, as well as changing the compound concentration, provide ways to control the explosion strength.

The researchers predict that this quick release of chemical energy will provide exciting opportunities for the design of new high-energy nanomaterials.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Science
KEYWORDS: buckybomb; carbon; explosives; graphene; nanoscale; science; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 03/06/2015 3:35:05 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Someone set us up the buckybomb!

50-picosecond detonation time!

Can you bring a tiny container of these on yer next flight to Warshington?

2 posted on 03/06/2015 3:44:59 PM PST by goldbux (CDO / I may have Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, but at least I put the letters in correct sequence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Snappers! But really tiny ones!


3 posted on 03/06/2015 3:49:34 PM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I’m sitting here wondering what a .45ACP would do if these were used as the propellant instead of smokeless powder.


4 posted on 03/06/2015 3:49:40 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Hobo: "I think you're gonna need a lot of dump trucks.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Maybe something good for Army shaped charges in the near future?


5 posted on 03/06/2015 3:54:05 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Breathe these nano-explosives in, and collapse. It might be 10 years before anybody has a clue as to what happened to you. But you will be in the ground. PING the Conspiracy List Freepers!!!


6 posted on 03/06/2015 3:56:16 PM PST by Klemper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Well... THAT didn’t take long :(


7 posted on 03/06/2015 3:56:17 PM PST by BlackAdderess ("Give me a but a firm spot on which to stand, and I shall move the earth". --Archimedes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Actually, firearm propellants are more effective with a slower burn.


8 posted on 03/06/2015 3:56:42 PM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Klemper

but you can bet your butt... they are working on it.


9 posted on 03/06/2015 3:57:52 PM PST by Klemper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Klemper

Soooooo, I shouldn’t use ‘em with the Osprey suppressor?

;-)


10 posted on 03/06/2015 3:58:07 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Hobo: "I think you're gonna need a lot of dump trucks.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Yeah, but buckyball bullets has a better ring to it.


11 posted on 03/06/2015 4:01:01 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Hobo: "I think you're gonna need a lot of dump trucks.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Seems like a good rocket fuel


12 posted on 03/06/2015 4:01:45 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Ban The BuckyBomb Immediately!





13 posted on 03/06/2015 4:03:47 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Ping for later...


14 posted on 03/06/2015 4:04:20 PM PST by babygene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeshugeMikey

A handsome man. Did anybody try Billy Beer? LOL


15 posted on 03/06/2015 4:07:09 PM PST by Klemper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The interesting is in it’s medical properties. See http://c60.net/


16 posted on 03/06/2015 4:08:20 PM PST by babygene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Melt the case and chamber.
This is a HOT explosive.


17 posted on 03/06/2015 4:09:48 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

“I’m sitting here wondering what a .45ACP would do if these were used as the propellant instead of smokeless powder.”

Here’s my understanding and I’m sure somebody will let us know if I’ve got it wrong. Different bullets require different speed explosives. Smaller bullets kill by shockwave and must travel fast, so their powder burns fast. A .380, for example, travels at 1200 fps. Larger bullets, like the .45 kill by transferring momentum and travel more slowly, about 800fps. Their powder burns more slowly.


18 posted on 03/06/2015 4:09:59 PM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Kaboom ping.


19 posted on 03/06/2015 4:10:24 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Technically gunpowder is a propellant, not an explosive.


20 posted on 03/06/2015 4:12:26 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson